915
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Features

“Technology inevitably involves trade-offs”: The framing of technology in social studies standards

ORCID Icon, &

References

  • An, S. (2016). Asian Americans in American history: An asiancrit perspective on Asian American inclusion in state U.S. history curriculum standards. Theory & Research in Social Education, 44(2), 244–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2016.1170646
  • Anderson, C. B., & Metzger, S. A. (2011). Slavery, the civil war era, and African American representation in U.S. history: An analysis of four states‘ academic standards. Theory & Research in Social Education, 39(3), 393–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2011.10473460
  • Apple, M. W. (2019). Ideology and curriculum (4th ed.). Routledge.
  • Au, W. (2011). Teaching under the new Taylorism: High-stakes testing and the standardization of the 21st century curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(1), 25–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2010.521261
  • Benjamin, R. (2013). People’s science: Bodies and rights on the stem cell frontier. Stanford University Press.
  • Benjamin, R. (2019). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new jim code. Polity.
  • Bolick, C. M. (2017). The diffusion of technology into the social studies. In M. M. Manfra & C. M. Bolick (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of social studies research (pp. 499–517). Wiley Blackwell.
  • Broussard, M. (2018). Artificial unintelligence: How computers misunderstand the world. MIT Press.
  • Buolamwini, J. A. (2017). Gender shades: Intersectional phenotypic and demographic evaluation of face datasets and gender classifiers [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  • Busey, C. L., & Walker, I. (2017). A dream and a bus: Black critical patriotism in elementary social studies standards. Theory & Research in Social Education, 45(4), 456–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2017.1320251
  • Carr, N. (2010). The shallows: What the internet is doing to our brains. Norton.
  • Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd Ed. ed.). Sage.
  • Clough, M. P., Olson, J. K., & Niederhauser, D. S. (Eds.). (2013). The nature of technology: Implications for teaching and learning. Sense Publishers.
  • Common, D. L. (1981). How to teach teachers about technology: A workshop for teachers. The Social Studies, 72(5), 199–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.1981.10118668
  • Considine, D. M. (2009). From gutenberg to gates: Media matters. The Social Studies, 100(2), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.3200/TSSS.100.2.63-74
  • Cowan, R. S. (1983). More work for mother: The ironies of household technology from the open hearth to the microwave. Basic Books.
  • Crowley, R. M., & King, L. J. (2018). Making inquiry critical: Examining power and inequity in the classroom. Social Education, 82(1), 14–17.
  • Ellul, J. (1964). The technological society. Vintage Books.
  • Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. St. Martin’s Press.
  • Gandy, S. K., & Resor, C. W. (2012). Changing technology and the U.S. mail. The Social Studies, 103(6), 226–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2011.630696
  • Gonzales, M. H., Riedel, E., Avery, P. G., & Sullivan, J. L. (2001). Rights and obligations in civic education: A content analysis of the national standards for civics and government. Theory & Research in Social Education, 29(1), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2001.10505931
  • Grant, S. G. (Ed.). (2008). Measuring history: Cases of state-level testing across the United States. Information Age.
  • Greene, J. (2021, December 2). Amazon’s employee surveillance fuels unionization efforts: ‘It’s not prison, it’s work’. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/12/02/amazon-workplace-monitoring-unions/
  • Harwell, D. (2020, November 12). Cheating-detection companies made millions during the pandemic. Now students are fighting back. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/11/12/test-monitoring-student-revolt/
  • Herold, B. (2019, May 30). Schools are deploying massive digital surveillance systems. The results are alarming. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/leadership/schools-are-deploying-massive-digital-surveillance-systems-the-results-are-alarming/2019/05
  • Hinton, A. M. (1963). Logic, computing machines, and automation. Spartan Books.
  • Houser, N. O., Krutka, D. G., Province Roberts, R., Pennington, K., & Faili Coerver, N. (2017). Navigating the reform–accountability culture in Oklahoma Social studies. Theory & Research in Social Education, 45(1), 7–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2016.1213213
  • Illich, I. (1973). Tools for conviviality. Harper & Row.
  • Jennings, S. (2013). Questions to facilitate the use of maps as primary sources in the classroom. The Social Studies, 104(5), 201–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2012.720306
  • Jones, S. E. (2013). Against technology: From the Luddites to neo-Luddism. Routledge.
  • Journell, W. (2008). When oppression and liberation are the only choices: The representation of African Americans within state social studies standards. Journal of Social Studies Research, 32(1), 40–50.
  • Journell, W. (2009). An incomplete history: Representation of American Indians in state social studies standards. Journal of American Indian Education, 48(2), 18–32.
  • Journell, W. (2010). Standardizing citizenship: The potential influence of state curriculum standards on the civic development of adolescents. PS, Political Science & Politics, 43(2), 351–358. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096510000272
  • Journell, W. (Ed.). (2019). Unpacking fake news: An educator’s guide to navigating the media with students. Teachers College Press.
  • Krutka, D. G. (2018). Technology. In D. G. Krutka, A. M. Whitlock, & M. Helmsing (Eds.), Keywords in the social studies: Concepts and conversations (pp. 279–292). Peter Lang.
  • Krutka, D. G. (2020). Move slower and protect people: Toward social media inquiry and activism in social studies. Social Education, 84(2), 113–117.
  • Krutka, D. G., & Heath, M. K. (2019). Has social media made it easier to effect social change?: Inquiring into tactics for change through primary sources. Social Education, 83(5), 269–274.
  • Krutka, D. G., Heath, M. K., & Mason, L. E. (2020). Technology won’t save us–A call for technoskepticism in social studies. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 20(1), 108–120.
  • Levstik, L. (2000). Articulating the silences: Teachers’ and adolescents’ conceptions of historical significance. In P. N. Stearns, P. Seixas, & S. Wineburg (Eds.), Knowing, teaching. and learning history: National and international perspectives (pp. 284-305). New York University Press.
  • Maguth, B. M. (2012). In defense of the social studies: Social studies programs in STEM education. Social Studies Research & Practice, 7(2), 65–90.
  • Manfra, M. M. (2013). Grand challenges: Nanotechnology and the social studies. Social Education, 77(2), 95–98.
  • Manolev, J., Sullivan, A., & Slee, R. (2019). The datafication of discipline: ClassDojo, surveillance and a performative classroom culture. Learning, Media and Technology, 44(1), 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2018.1558237
  • Marino, M., & Bolgatz, J. (2010). Weaving a fabric of world history? An analysis of U.S. state high school world history standards. Theory & Research in Social Education, 38(3), 366–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2010.10473431
  • Martorella, P. H. (1997). Technology and the social studies—or: Which way to the sleeping giant? Theory & Research in Social Education, 25(4), 511–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.1997.10505828
  • Mason, L. E. (2013). Science fiction in social education: Exploring consequences of technology. Social Education, 77(3), 132–134, 156.
  • Mason, L. E. (2016). McLuhan’s challenge to critical media literacy: The City as Classroom textbook. Curriculum Inquiry, 46(1), 79–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.2015.1113511
  • Mason, L. E. (2018). Media. In D. G. Krutka, A. M. Whitlock, & M. Helmsing (Eds.), Keywords in the social studies: Concepts and conversations (pp. 293–304). Peter Lang.
  • Mason, L. E., Krutka, D. G., & Heath, M. K. (2021). The metaphor is the message: Limitations of the media literacy metaphor for social studies. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 21(3), 770–780.
  • Mason, L. E., & Metzger, S. (2012). Reconceptualizing media literacy in the social studies: A pragmatist critique of the NCSS position statement on media literacy. Theory & Research in Social Education, 40(4), 436–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2012.724630
  • McGrew, S., Breakstone, J., Ortega, T., Smith, M., & Wineburg, S. (2018). Can students evaluate online sources? Learning from assessments of civic online reasoning. Theory & Research in Social Education, 46(2), 165–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2017.1416320
  • McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: Extensions of man. McGraw-Hill.
  • Mumford, L. (1934). Technics and civilization. Routledge & Kagan Paul.
  • National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS). (1990). Teaching about science, technology, and society in social studies: Education for citizenship in the 21st Century. Social Education, 54(4), 189–193.
  • National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS). (1994/2010). National curriculum standards for social studies: A framework for teaching, learning, and assessment. https://www.socialstudies.org/national-curriculum-standards-social-studies-chapter-2-themes-social-studies
  • National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS). (2006). Technology position statement and guidelines. Social Education, 70(5), 329–332.
  • National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS). (2013a). The college, career, and civic life (C3) framework for social studies state standards: Guidance for enhancing the rigor of K–12 civics, economics, geography, and history.
  • National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS). (2013b). Technology position statement and guidelines. https://www.socialstudies.org/position-statements/technology-position-statement-and-guidelines
  • Noble, D. F. (1999). The religion of technology: The divinity of man and the spirit of invention. Penguin.
  • Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York University Press.
  • Pleasants, J., Clough, M. P., Olson, J. K., & Miller, G. (2019). Fundamental issues regarding the nature of technology. Science & Education, 28(3–5), 561–597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00056-y
  • Postman, N. (1992). Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. Vintage.
  • Postman, N. (1995). The end of education: Redefining the value of school. Vintage.
  • Postman, N. (1998, March 28). Five things we need to know about technological change [Address]. https://web.cs.ucdavis.edu/~rogaway/classes/188/materials/postman.pdf
  • Rapoport, A. (2009). A forgotten concept: Global citizenship education and state social studies standards. Journal of Social Studies Research, 33(1), 91–112.
  • Sabzalian, L., Shear, S. B., & Snyder, J. (2021). Standardizing Indigenous erasure: A TribalCrit and QuantCrit analysis of K–12 U.S. civics and government standards. Theory & Research in Social Education, 49(3), 321–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2021.1922322
  • Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage.
  • Salinas, C., & Castro, A. J. (2010). Disrupting the official curriculum: Cultural biography and the curriculum decision making of Latino preservice teachers. Theory & Research in Social Education, 38(3), 428–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2010.10473433
  • Segall, A. (2003). Maps as stories about the world. Social Studies and the Young Learner, 16(1), 21–25.
  • Shear, S. B., Knowles, R. T., Soden, G. J., & Castro, A. J. (2015). Manifesting destiny: Re/presentations of indigenous peoples in K–12 U.S. history standards. Theory & Research in Social Education, 43(1), 68–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2014.999849
  • Singleton, L. R. (1997). Out of the laboratory: Teaching about the history and nature of science and technology. The Social Studies, 88(3), 127–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377999709603759
  • Sleeter, C., & Stillman, J. (2005). Standardizing knowledge in a multicultural society. Curriculum Inquiry, 35(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2005.00314.x
  • Speck, J. (2013). Walkable city: How downtown can save America, one step at a time. Farrar, Straus, & Giroux.
  • Steele, M. (2014). Strike up student interest through song: Technology and westward expansion. Social Education, 78(1), 7–15.
  • Stoddard, J. (2014). The need for media education in democratic education. Democracy and Education, 22(1), 1–9.
  • Stoddard, J. D., & Marcus, A. S. (2017). Media and social studies education. In M. M. Manfra & C. M. Bolick (Eds.), The Wiley Handbook of Social Studies Research (pp. 477–498). Wiley Blackwell.
  • Sullivan, A. M. (2015). “I don’t buy it”: Critical media literacy in the fifth grade. Social Studies and the Young Learner, 28(2), 14–16.
  • Symcox, L. (2002). Whose history? The struggle for national standards in American classrooms. Teachers College Press.
  • Thornton, S. J. (2005). Teaching social studies that matters: Curriculum for active learning. Teachers College Press.
  • Thornton, S. J. (2006). What matters most for gatekeeping? A response to Vansledright. Theory & Research in Social Education, 34(3), 416–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2006.10473316
  • Vasquez Heilig, J., Brown, K., & Brown, A. (2012). The illusion of inclusion: A critical race theory textual analysis of race and standards. Harvard Educational Review, 82(3), 403–424. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.82.3.84p8228670j24650
  • Watters, A. (2020, July 20). ‘Luddite sensibilities’ and the future of education. Hack Education [blog]. https://hackeducation.com/2020/07/29/luddite-sensibilities
  • Weizenbaum, J. (1976). Computer power and human reason: From judgment to calculation. W H Freeman & Co.
  • Winner, L. (1986/2020). The whale and the reactor: A search for limits in an age of high technology (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
  • Wolla, S., Schug, M. C., & Wood, W. C. (2019). The economics of artificial intelligence and robotics. Social Education, 83(2), 84–88.
  • Zimmerman, J. (2005). Whose America? Culture wars in the public schools. Harvard University Press.
  • Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for the future at the new frontier of power. Hachette Book Group.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.