Backdirt Ecopoetics

References

• Archaeological Institute of America. 2023. “Glossary.” https://www.archaeological.org/programs/educators/introduction-to-archaeology/glossary/.
   Google Scholar
• Edgeworth, M. 2016. “The Ground Beneath Our Feet: Beyond Surface Appearances.” In Mensch Macht Natur. Landschaft Im Anthropozän, edited by G. Mackert, and P. Petritsch. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Feld, S. 2014. “Places Sensed, Senses Placed.” In Empire of the Senses : The Sensual Cultural Reader, edited by D. Howes, 179–91. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Gidwani, V., and R. N. Reddy. 2011. “The Afterlives of ‘Waste’: Notes from India for a Minor History of Capitalist Surplus.” Antipode 43 (5): 1625–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2011.00902.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guattari, F. 2000. The Three Ecologies. London and New Brunswick, NJ: The Athlone Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. 1997. “Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium. FemaleMan©_Meets_OncoMouse™: Feminism and Technoscience.” New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Experimental Futures: Technological Lives, Scientific Arts, Anthropological Voices. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harman, G. 2005. Guerrilla Metaphysics: Phenomenology and the Carpentry of Things. Chicago: Carus Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Harman, G. 2019. “The Coldness of Forgetting: OOO in Philosophy, Archaeology, and History.” Open Philosophy 2 (1): 270–79. https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2019-0023.
   Google Scholar
• Harman, G., and C. Witmore. 2023. Objects Untimely: Object-Oriented Philosophy and Archaeology. Medford: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hodder, I., and G. Lucas. 2017. “The Symmetries and Asymmetries of Human–Thing Relations. A Dialogue.” Archaeological Dialogues 24 (02): 119–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203817000137.
   Google Scholar
• Humes, E. 2012. Garbology: Our Dirty Love Affair with Trash. New York: Avery (Penguin Group).
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. 2018. “One World Anthropology.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 8 (1–2): 158–71. https://doi.org/10.1086/698315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ireland, A. 2013. “Ontology for Ontology’s Sake: Object-Oriented Philosophy as Poetic Metaphysics.” https://www.academia.edu/3690777/Ontology_for_Ontologys_Sake_Object_Oriented_Philosophy_as_Poetic_Metaphysics.
   Google Scholar
• Jay, M. 1993. Downcast Eyes: The Denigration of Vision in Twentieth-Century French Thought. London: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jemisin, N. K. 2015. The Fifth Season. First Edition. The Broken Earth 1. New York, NY: Orbit.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, C., and P. Richardson. 2012. “Stepping Into Comfortable Old Shoes: ‘The Consequence of Archaeological Comfortability.’” In Reconsidering Archaeological Fieldwork, edited by H. Cobb, O. J. T. Harris, C. Jones, and P. Richardson, 85–96. Boston, MA: Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2338-6.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2004. “How to Talk About the Body? The Normative Dimension of Science Studies.” Body & Society 10 (2–3): 205–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X04042943.
   Google Scholar
• Liboiron, M. 2021. Pollution Is Colonialism. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Logan, W. B. 1995. Dirt: The Ecstatic Skin of the Earth. New York: Riverhead Books.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, E. 2009a. Relationscapes: Movement, Art, Philosophy. Technologies of Lived Abstraction. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, E. 2009b. “Taking the Next Step: Touch as Technique.” The Senses & Society 4 (2): 211–25. https://doi.org/10.2752/174589309X425148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, L. 2002. Touch - Sensuous Theory and Multisensory Media. London: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. 1994. Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nancy, J. L. 2013. “Extraordinary Sense.” Senses and Society 8 (1): 10–13. https://doi.org/10.2752/174589313X13500466750778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parcak, S. H. 2009. Satellite Remote Sensing for Archaeology. London : New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203881460.
   Google Scholar
• Pijpers, K. 2021. “Worlding Excavation Practices.” Open Archaeology 7 (1): 889–903. https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2020-0177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puig de la Bellacasa, M. 2012. “‘Nothing Comes Without Its World’: Thinking with Care.” The Sociological Review 60 (2): 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02070.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puig de la Bellacasa, M. 2021. “Embracing Breakdown: Soil Ecopoetics and the Ambivalences of Remediation.” In Reactivating Elements: Chemistry, Ecology, Practice, edited by D. Papadopoulos, M. Puig de la Bellacasa, and N. Myers, 196–230. Elements. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Renfrew, C., and P. Bahn. 2005. Archaeology: The Key Concepts. London; New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reno, J. 2013. “Waste.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of the Contemporary World, edited by P. Graves-Brown, R. Harrison, and A. Piccini, First edition, 261–72. Oxford Handbooks in Archaeology. Oxford, United Kingdom; New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Serres, M. 1985. The Five Senses: A Philosophy of Mingled Bodies. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Sloterdijk, P. 2012. “Nearness and Da-sein: The Spatiality of Being and Time.” Theory, Culture & Society 29 (4–5): 36–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276412448828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, S. L. 1999. “The Ethnography of Infrastructure.” American Behavioral Scientist 43 (3): 377–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027649921955326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stengers, I. 2011. “Wondering About Materialism.” In The Speculative Turn: Continental Materialism and Realism, edited by L. Bryant, N. Srnicek, and G. Harman, 6:368–80. Melbourne: re.press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. 2017. Rubbish Theory: The Creation and Destruction of Value. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tilley, C. 2019. “How Does It Feel? Phenomenology, Excavation and Sensory Experience Notes for a New Ethnographic Field Practice.” In The Routledge Handbook of Sensory Archaeology, edited by R. Skeates and J. Day, 1st ed., 76–93. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315560175.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Tuin, I., and N. Verhoeff. 2022. Critical Concepts for the Creative Humanities. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Vasseleu, C. 2009. “Tactile Animation: Haptic Devices and the Švankmajer Touch.” The Senses and Society 4 (2): 141–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfendale, P. 2014. Object-Oriented Philosophy: The Noumenon’s New Clothes. Windsor Quarry: Urbanomic.
   Google Scholar