Tracking and Ability Grouping

References

• Becker, H. J. (1987). “Addressing the Needs of Different Groups of Early Adolescents: Effects of Varying School and Classroom Organizational Practices on Students from Different Social Backgrounds and Abilities.” Baltimore: Center for Research on Elementary and Middle Schools, The Johns Hopkins University, Report 16.
   Google Scholar
• Brophy, J.E., and Good, T.L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed), Handbook of research of teaching (third edition), 328–375.
   Google Scholar
• Coldiron, J. R., Braddock, J.H., & McPartland, J.M. (1987). A description of school structures and classroom practices in elementary, middle, and secondary schools (Report 14). Center of Research on Elementary and Middle Schools, The Johns Hopkins University.
   Google Scholar
• Evertson, C. (1982). Differences in instructional activities in averaging and low-achieving junior high English and math classes. Elementary School Journal, 82, 329–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felmlee, D.E., & Eder, D. (1983). Contextual effects in the classroom: The impact of ability groups on student attention. Sociology of Education, 56, 77–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamoran, A. & Berends, M. (1987). The effects of stratification in secondary schools: Synthesis of survey and ethnographic research. Reveiw of Educational Research, 57, 415–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Good, T., & Brophy, J. (1987). Looking in classrooms. 4th Edition. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Good, T., & Marshall, S. (1983). Do students learn more in heterogeneous or homogeneous groups? In Peterson, P.L., Wilkinson, L.C., & Hallinan, M. (Eds.). The social context of instruction: Group organization and group process. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hawley, W. R. and Rosenholtz, S.J. (1987). Achieving Quality Integrated Education, NEA Professional Library, cited in R&R Preview. Vol. 1, No. 4.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, J. H. and Markle, G. (1986) What Research Says to the Middle Level Practitioner. Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsitz, J. (1984). Successful schools for early adolescents. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hartill, R. (1936). Homogeneous grouping as a policy in the elementary schools in New York City. (Teachers College, Columbia: Contributions to education, No. 690). New York: Columbia University, Teachers College.
   Google Scholar
• Kerckhoff, A.C. (1986). Effects of ability grouping in British secondary schools. American Sociology Review, 51, 842–858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulik, J.A., & Kulik, C-L. (1984). Effects of ability grouping on secondary school students: A meta-analysis of evaluation findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 415–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metz, M.H. (1978). Classrooms and corridors: The crisis of authority in desegregated secondary schools. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oakes, J. (1988). Tracking: Can schools take a different route? NEA Today, 6, 4147.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, A., Farrar, E., & Cohen, D.K. (1985). The shopping mall high school Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, R.E. (1987). Ability grouping and student achievement in elementary schools: A best evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 57, 293–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorenson, A.B., & Hallinan, M.T. (1986). Effects of ability grouping on growth in academic achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 519–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanfossen, B.E., Jones, J.D., & Spade, J.Z. (1987). Curriculum tracking and status maintenance. Sociology of Education, 60, 104–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar