Getting “Real” in Virtual Talk about Text

Reference

• Aukerman, M. (2007). When reading it wrong is getting it right: Shared evaluation pedagogy among struggling fifth grade readers. Research in the Teaching of English, 42(1), 56–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bintz, W. P., & Shelton, K. S. (2004). Using written conversation in middle school: Lessons from a teacher research project. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 47, 492–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloome, D., & Argumedo, B. (1983). Procedural display and classroom interaction: Another look at academic engaged time. In T. O. Erb (Ed.), Middle school research: Selected studies (pp. 1–20). Columbus, OH: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cantu, L., & López, L. (1998). Technology for education: IDRA focus. Intercultural Development Research Association Newsletter, 25, 1–2, 17–18.
   Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., Anderson, R. C., & Waggoner, M. A. (2001). Patterns of discourse in two kinds of literature discussion. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 378–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cisneros, S. (1984). The house on Mango Street. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Dyson, A. (1993). Social worlds of children learning to write. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eeds, M., & Wells, D. (1989). Grand conversations: An exploration of meaning construction in literature study groups. Research in the Teaching of English, 23(10), 4–29.
   Google Scholar
• Finders, M. (1997). Just girls: Hidden literacies and life in junior high. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grisham, D. L., & Wolsey, T. D. (2008). Recentering the middle school classroom as a vibrant learning community: Students, literacy, and technology intersect. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 48, 848–880.
   Google Scholar
• Golden, J. (1986). Reader-text interaction. Theory Into Practice, 25, 91–96.
   Google Scholar
• Gutierrez, K. D., Rymes, B., & Larson, J. (1995). Script, counterscript, and underlife in the classroom: James Brown versus Brown v. Board of education. Harvard Educational Review, 65, 445–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse, K. (1997). Out of the dust. New York: Scholastic.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, L. (1993). Thank you, m'am. In A. Mazer (Ed.), America street: A multicultural anthology of stories (pp. 49–54). New York: Persea Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lakkala, M., Ilomäki, L., & Palonen, T. (2007). Implementing virtual collaborative inquiry practises in a middle-school context. Behaviour & Information Technology, 26(1), 37–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei, J., & Zhao, Y. (2007). Technology uses and student achievement: A longitudinal study. Computers & Education, 49, 284–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCallum, R., Martin, P., & Aukerman, M. (2003, December). Cal reads: The efficacy of the small group intervention. Paper presented at the National Reading Conference, Scottsdale, AZ.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 22–38). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (1991). Instructional discourse, student engagement, and literature achievement. Research in the Teaching of English, 25, 261–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, P. D., Ferdig, R. E., Blomeyer, R. L., & Moran, J. (2005). The effects of technology on reading performance in the middle-school grades: A meta-analysis with recommendations for policy. Naperville, IL: Learning Point Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. (2008). Really reading: What does accelerated reader teach adults and children? Language Arts, 85(3), 202–211.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, B. J., Kaplan, K. A., & Borck, J. E. (2007). Enhancing adolescent literacy achievement through integration of technology in the classroom. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(3), 416–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware, P. (2006). From sharing time to showtime! Valuing diverse venues for storytelling in technology-rich classrooms. Language Arts, 84(1), 45–54.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M. (1922/1991). The velveteen rabbit. New York: Delacorte Press.
   Google Scholar