Targeting Content Area Literacy Instruction to Meet the Needs of Adolescent English Language Learners

References

• Amanti, C. (2005). Beyond a beads and feathers approach. In N. Gonzalez, L. C. Moll, & C. Amanti (Eds.), Funds of knowledge (pp. 131–142). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, S. J. (2008). Teacher language awareness. In J. Cenoz & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (2nd ed., pp. 287–298). New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Anthony, A. R. B. (2008). Output strategies for English language learners: Theory to practice. The Reading Teacher, 61(6), 472–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auerbach, E. R. (1993). Reexamining English-only in the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 27(1), 9–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batalova, J., Fix, M., & Murray, J. (2005). English language learner adolescents: Demographics and literacy achievements. Report to the Center for Applied Linguistics. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Billmeyer, R., & Barton, M. L. (1998). Teaching reading in the content areas: If not me, then who? Aurora, CO: Mid-continental Research for Education and Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Blachowicz, C. L. Z., & Fisher, P. (2000). Vocabulary instruction. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 503–423). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Buehl, D. (2001). Classroom strategies for interactive learning. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Chamot, A. U. (2005). CALLA: An update. In P. A. Richard-Amato & M. A. Snow (Eds.), Academic success for English language learners (pp. 87–101). White Plains, NY: Pearson-Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Chamot, A. U., & O’Malley, J. M. (1996). The cognitive academic language learning approach: A model for linguistically diverse classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 96(3), 259–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, V. (1987). Age and rate of acquisition of second language for academic purposes. TESOL Quarterly, 21(4), 10–34.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, J. (1981). The role of primary language development in promoting educational success for language minority students. In Schooling and language minority students: A theoretical framework (pp. 3–49). Sacramento, CA: California State Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, J. (2001). Negotiating identities: Education for empowerment in a diverse society. Ontario, CA: California Association for Bilingual Education (CABE).
   Google Scholar
• Diaz-Rico, L. T., & Weed, K. Z. (2010). The crosscultural language & academic development handbook: A complete K–12 reference guide (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Dong, Y. (2005). Getting at the content. Educational Leadership, 62(4), 14–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Echevarria, J., Vogt, M., & Short, D. J. (2010). Making content comprehensible for English learners: The SIOP model. Boston: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, Z. (2006). The language demands of science reading in middle school. International journal of Science Education, 28(5), 491–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2007). Checking for understanding: Formative assessment techniques for your classroom. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, M. A. (2000). Marshalltown, Iowa, and the struggle for community in a global age. In T. W. Collins & J. D. Wingard (Eds.), Communities and capital (pp. 87–102). Atlanta, GA: University of Georgia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, A. L., & Garner, R. (1985). Synthesis of research on students’ ability to summarize text. Educational Leadership, 42(5), 52–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, C., & de Jong, E. (2004). Misconceptions about teaching English-language learners. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 48(2), 152–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krashen, S. D., & Terrell, T. (1984). The natural method: Language acquisition in the classroom. Oxford: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. F., & Van Patten, B. (2003). Making communicative language teaching happen. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, J. (2008). Utah refugee programs have a hard time coping with growing demand. The Salt Lake Tribune. Retrieved October 15, 2008, from http://www.sltrib.com/ci_10678217
   Google Scholar
• McTighe, J., & O’Connor, K. (2005). Seven practices for effective learning. Educational Leadership, 63(3), 10–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muniz, B. (2006). In the eye of the storm: How the government and private response to Hurricane Katrina failed Latinos [White paper]. Washington, DC: National Council of La Raza.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Educational Statistics. (2007). National Assessment of Educational Progress, 2007, reading assessments. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [NICHD]. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No.00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Northcutt, M., & Watson, D. (1986). Sheltered English teaching handbook. San Marcos, CA: AM Graphics and Printing.
   Google Scholar
• Ogle, D. M. (2007). Best practices in adolescent literacy instruction. In L. B. Gambrell, L. M. Morrow, & M. Pressley (Eds.), Best practices in literacy instruction (3rd ed., pp. 127–156). New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Peregoy, S. F., & Boyle, O. F. (2010). Reading, writing, and learning in ESL: A resource book for K–12 teachers (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Rossen, N. G., & Sasser, L. (1997). Sheltered English: Modifying content delivery for second language learners. In M. A. Snow & D. M. Brinton (Eds.), The content-based classroom (pp. 35–45). New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Rubinstein-Ávila, E., & Johnson, J. (2008). Meaningful content for middle school students for whom English is an additional language. In K. A. Hinchman & H. K. Sheridan-Thomas (Eds.), Best practices in adolescent literacy instruction (pp. 20–38). New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Short, D. J. (2001). Language learning in sheltered social studies classes. TESOL Journal, 11(1), 18–24.
   Google Scholar
• Short, D. J., & Echevarria, J. (2005). Teacher skills to support English language learners. Educational Leadership, 62(4), 8–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Short, D., & Fitzsimmons, S. (2007). Double the work: Challenges and solutions to acquiring language and academic literacy for adolescent English language learners—A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, W. P., & Collier, V. (2001). School effectiveness for language minority students. Washington, DC: National Center for Bilingual Education.
   Google Scholar
• Vacca, R. T., & Vacca, J. L. (2008). Content area reading (9th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
   Google Scholar