Results and Recommendations from the 2009 National Surveys of Randomly Selected and Highly Successful Middle Level Schools

References

• Alexander, W. M. (1968). A survey of organizational patterns of reorganized middle schools. Washington, DC: United States Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, W. M. (1995). The junior high school: A changing view. Middle School Journal, 26(3), 20–24.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, W. M., & McEwin, C. K. (1989). Schools in the middle: Status and progress. Columbus, OH: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, W. M., Williams, E., Compton, M., Hines, V. A., Prescott, D., & Kealy, R. (1968). The emergent middle school (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Anfara, V. (2006). Advisor-advisee programs: Important but problematic. Middle School Journal, 38(1), 54–60.
   Google Scholar
• Arhar, J. (1990). Interdisciplinary teaming as a school intervention to increase social bonding of middle school students. Research in Middle Level Education: Selected Studies 1990. Columbus, OH: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Beane, J. (1990). The middle school curriculum: From rhetoric to reality. Columbus, OH: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brazee, E. N., & Capelluti, J. (1995). Dissolving boundaries: Toward an integrative curriculum. Columbus, OH: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, K., & Edwards, F. (1978). The middle school in transition: A research report on the status of the middle school movement. Center for Professional Development. Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky.
   Google Scholar
• Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development. (1989). Turning points: Preparing American youth for the 21st century. New York: Carnegie Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Cawelti, G. (1988, November). Middle schools a better match with early adolescent needs, ASCD survey finds. ASCD Curriculum Update, 1–12. Washington, DC: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Compton, M. F. (1976). The middle school: A status report. Middle School Journal, 7(2), 3–5.
   Google Scholar
• Dickinson, T. S. (2001). Reinventing the middle school: A proposal to counter arrested development. In T. S. Dickinson (Ed.), Reinventing the middle school (pp. 1–20). New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, J. L., & Mac Iver, D. J. (1990). Education in the middle grades: National practices and trends. Columbus, OH: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Flowers, N., Mertens, S., & Mulhall, P. (1999). The impact of teaming: Five research-based outcomes of teaming. Middle School Journal, 31(2), 57–60.
   Google Scholar
• Flowers, N., Mertens, S. B., & Mulhall, P. (2000). How teaming influences classroom practices. Middle School Journal, 32(2), 52–59.
   Google Scholar
• Galassi, J., Gulledge, S. A., & Cox, N. D. (1998). Advisory: Definitions, descriptions, decisions, directions. Columbus, OH: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gaskill, P. E. (2007). The current status of middle grades teaching credentials: Executive summary. Retrieved September 2, 2009, from http://www.peggygaskill.com/images/Executive%20Summary-March%202007.pdf
   Google Scholar
• George, P. S. (2009a). Renewing the middle school: The early success of middle school education. Middle School Journal, 41(1), 4–9.
   Google Scholar
• George, P. S. (2009b). Renewing the middle school: The manufactured crisis. Middle School Journal, 41(2), 51–55.
   Google Scholar
• George, P. S. (2009c). Special report: The status of programs in Florida middle schools. Gainesville, FL: School of Teaching and Learning, University of Florida.
   Google Scholar
• George, P. S., & Alexander, W. M. (2003). The exemplary middle school (3rd. ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
   Google Scholar
• George, P. S., & Lounsbury, J. H. (2000). Making big schools feel small: Multiage grouping, looping, and schools-within-a-school. Westerville, OH: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• George, P. S., & Oldaker, L. L. (1985). Evidence for the middle school. Columbus, OH: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• George, P. S., & Shewey, K. (1994). New evidence for the middle school. Columbus, OH: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lounsbury, J. H. (2009). Deferred but not deterred: A middle school manifesto. Middle School Journal, 40(5), 31–36.
   Google Scholar
• Lounsbury, J. H., & Vars, G. E. (1978). A curriculum for the middle years. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• McEwin, C. K., Dickinson, T. S., & Jenkins, D. M. (1996). America's middle schools: Practices and progress—A twenty-five year perspective. Columbus, OH: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McEwin, C. K., Dickinson, T. S., & Jenkins, D. M. (2003). America's middle schools in the new century: Status and progress. Westerville, OH: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McEwin, C. K., Dickinson, T. S., & Smith, T. W. (2003). Middle level teacher preparation: Status, progress, and challenges. In P. G. Andrews & V. A. Anfara, Jr. (Eds.), Leaders for a movement: Professional preparation and development of middle level teachers and administrators (pp. 3–26). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• McEwin, C. K., Dickinson, T. S., & Smith, T. W. (2004). The role of teacher preparation, licensure, and retention in creating high performing middle schools. In S. Thompson (Ed.), Reforming middle level education: Considerations for policymakers (pp. 109–129). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• McEwin, C. K., & Greene, M. W. (in press). Programs and practices in America's middle schools: A status report. In G. Andrews (Ed.), Research to guide practice in middle grades education. Westerville, OH: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McEwin, C. K., & Smith, T. S. (in press). The professional preparation of middle level teachers. In G. Andrews (Ed.), Research to guide practice in middle grades education. Westerville, OH: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McEwin, C. K., & Swaim, J. (2007). Clearing the hurdles: Issues and answers in middle school sports. Westerville, OH: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mertens, S. B., & Flowers, N. (2006). Middle Start's impact on comprehensive middle school reform. Middle Grades Research Journal, 1(1), 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Mertens, S. B., Flowers, N., Anfara, V. A., Jr., & Caskey, M.M. (2010). Common planning time. Middle School Journal, 41(5), 50–57.
   Google Scholar
• Mertens, S. B., Flowers, N., & Mulhall, P. (1998). The middle start initiative, phase I: A longitudinal analysis of Michigan middle-level schools. Champaign, IL: Center for Prevention of Research and Development, University of Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• National Association of Secondary School Principals. (2006). Breaking ranks in the middle: Strategies for leading middle level reform. Reston, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Association of Secondary School Principals. (n. d.). What are the selection criteria? Retrieved August 25, 2009, from http://www.principals.org/s_nassp/sec.asp?CID=1685&DID=58798
   Google Scholar
• National Forum to Accelerate Middle Grades Reform (2001). Student assignment in the middle grades: Toward academic success for all students. Retrieved September 11, 2009, from http://www.mgforum.org/Portals/0/MGFdocs/AbilityGrouping.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Forum to Accelerate Middle Grades Reform (n. d.). Our criteria. Retrieved August 25, 2009, from http://www.schoolstowatch.org/OurCriteria/tabid/118/Default.aspx
   Google Scholar
• National Middle School Association. (2003). This we believe: Successful schools for young adolescents. Westerville, OH: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Middle School Association. (2004a). A position paper on curriculum integration. Retrieved August 21, 2009, from http://www.nmsa.org/AboutNMSA/PositionStatements/CurriculumIntegration/tabid/282/Default.aspx
   Google Scholar
• National Middle School Association. (2004b). National Middle School Association's position statement on professional preparation of middle level teachers. Retrieved September 2, 2004, from http://www.nmsa.org/news/middlelevelteachers.htm
   Google Scholar
• National Middle School Association. (2005). NMSA position statement on curriculum, instruction, and assessment. Retrieved August 21, 2009, from http://www.nmsa.org/AboutNMSA/PositionStatements/Curriculum/tabid/767/Default.aspx
   Google Scholar
• National Middle School Association. (2007a, January). Flexible scheduling. Retrieved August 3, 2009, from http://www.nmsa.org/Research/ResearchSummaries/FlexibleScheduling/tabid/1140/Default.aspx
   Google Scholar
• National Middle School Association. (2007b). Heterogeneous grouping. Retrieved September 11, 2009, from http://www.nmsa.org/Research/ResearchSummaries/HeterogeneousGrouping/tabid/1264/Default.aspx
   Google Scholar
• National Middle School Association. (2010a). Research and resources in support of This We Believe. Westerville, OH: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Middle School Association. (2010b). This we believe: Keys to educating young adolescents. Westerville, OH: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Pool, H., & Page, J. A. (Eds.). (1995). Beyond tracking: Finding success in inclusive schools. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E. (1990). Achievement effects of ability grouping in secondary schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 60(3), 471–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentine, J. W., Clark, D. C., Hackmann, D. G., & Petzko, V. N. (2002). A national study of leadership in middle level schools: Volume I: A national study of middle level leaders and school programs. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, L. L., & Muth, K. D. (1995). The impact of common planning time on middle grades students and teachers. Research in Middle Level Education Quarterly, 18(3), 41–58.
   Google Scholar
• Wheelock, A. (1992). Crossing the tracks: How untracking can save America's schools. New York: The New Press.
   Google Scholar