688
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

The Cybathlon experience: beyond transhumanism to capability hybridization

ORCID Icon &

References

  • Aas, A., and D. Wasserman. 2016. “Brain–Computer Interfaces and Disability: Extending Embodiment, Reducing Stigma?” Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (1): 37–40. doi:10.1136/medethics-2015-102807.
  • Andrieu, B. 2018. Le corps capacitaire. Une performativité du vivant. Paris: Presse.
  • Andrieu, B., and S. Loland. 2017. “The Ecology of Sport: From the Practice of Body Ecology to Emersed Leisure.” Loisir et Société/Society and Leisure 40 (1): 1–6. doi:10.1080/07053436.2017.1282200.
  • Andrieu, B., and S. Sirost. 2018. “Central Themes in Body Bcology.” In Body Ecology and Emersive Leisure, edited by B. Andrieu, B. J. Parry, A. Porrovecchio, and O. Sirost, 26–40. New York: Routledge.
  • Bush, A., M. Silk, J. Porter, and P. D. Howe. 2013. “Disability [Sport] and Discourse: Stories within the Paralympic Legacy.” Reflective Practice 14 (5): 632–647. doi:10.1080/14623943.2013.835721.
  • Campbell, F. 2009. Contours of Ableism: The Production of Disability and Abledness. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Cherney, J. L., K. Lidemann, and M. Hardin. 2013. “Research in Communication, Disability, and Sport.” Communication & Sports 3 (1): 8–26. doi:10.1177/2167479513514847.
  • Clark, A. 2004. Natural-Born Cyborgs: Minds, Technologies, and the Future of Human Intelligence. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Corker, M., and T. Shakespeare. 2002. Disability/Postmodernity Embodying Disability Theory. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  • Dalibert, L. 2014. “Posthumanism and Somatechnologies. Exploring the Intimate Relations between Humans and Technologies.” PhD diss., University of Twente.
  • Dalibert, L. 2015. “Remarquables, mais non (re-) marqués: Le rôle du genre et de la blanchité dans les représentations des corps ‘technologisés ‘.” Poli – Politique de l’image 10 (1): 50–59.
  • Dalibert, L. 2016. “Living with Spinal Cord Stimulation: Doing Embodiment and Incorpora- Tion.” Science, Technology, and Human Values 41 (4): 635–659. doi:10.1177/0162243915617833.
  • DePauw, K. 1997. “The (In)Visibility of DisAbility: Cultural Contexts and ‘Sporting Bodies’.” Quest 49 (1): 416–430. doi:10.1080/00336297.1997.10484258.
  • DePauw, K. P., and S. J. Gavron. 1995. Disability and Sport. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
  • Dolezal, L. 2017. “Representing Posthuman Embodiment: Considering Disability and the Case of Aimee Mullins.” Women’s Studies 46 (1): 60–75. doi:10.1080/00497878.2017.1252569.
  • Ellcessor, E. 2016. “Cyborg Hoaxes: Disability, Deception, and Critical Studies of Digital Media.” New Media & Society 19(11): 1–17.
  • Foucault, M. 2009. Sécurité, territoire, population. Cours au Collège de France 1977–1978. Paris: Gallimard.
  • Geere, D. 2016. “After the Paralympics Comes the Tech-Fuelled ‘Cybathlon’.” Techradar. http://www.techradar.com/news/world-of-tech/after-the-paralympicscomes-the-tech- fuelled-cybathlon–1329859
  • Gibson, B. E., F. A. Carnevale, and G. King. 2012. “This Is My Way: Reimagining Disability, In/Dependence and Interconnectedness of Persons and Assistive Technologies.” Disability and Rehabilitation 34 (22): 1894–1899. doi:10.3109/09638288.2012.670040.
  • Goodley, D., R. Lawthom, and K. Runswick Cole. 2014. “Posthuman Disability Studies.” Subjectivity 7 (4): 342–361. doi:10.1057/sub.2014.15.
  • Goodley, D., and K. Runswick-Cole. 2013. “The Body as Disability and Possability: Theorizing the “Leaking, Lacking and Excessive” Bodies of Disabled Children.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 15 (1): 1–19. doi:10.1080/15017419.2011.640410.
  • Haraway, D. J. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. London: Routledge.
  • Hardin, M. M., and B. Hardin. 2004. “The ’Supercrip’; in Sport Media: Wheelchair Athletes Discuss Hegemony’s Disabled Hero.” Sociology of Sport Online - SOSOL 7 (1). https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20053024129
  • Howe, D. 2008. The Cultural Politics of the Paralympic Movement: Through an Anthropological Lens. London. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Howe, D. 2011. “Cyborg and Supercrip: The Paralympics Technology and the (Dis)Empowerment of Disabled Athletes.” Sociology 45 (5): 868–882. doi:10.1177/0038038511413421.
  • Howe, P. D., and C. F. Silva. 2017. “The Cyborgification of Paralympic Sport.” Movement & Sport Sciences 97 (1): 17–25. doi:10.1051/sm/2017014.
  • Jeffress, M. S. 2015. Communication, Sport and Disability: The Case of Power Soccer. New York: Routledge.
  • Jönsson, K. 2010. “Sport beyond Gender and the Emergence of Cyborg Athletes.” Sport in Society: Cultures, Commerce, Media, Politics 2 (13): 249–259. doi:10.1080/17430430903522962.
  • Kuppers, P. 2011. Disability Culture and Community Performance: Find a Strange and Twisted Shape. Houndmills and New York: Palgrave.
  • Le Dévédec, N. 2015. La société de l’amélioration. La perfectibilité, des lumières au transhumanisme. Montréal: Liber.
  • Lopez Frias, F. J. 2016. “The Defining Components of the Cyborg: Cyborg-Athletes, Fictional or Real?” Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 10 (1): 97–111. doi:10.1080/17511321.2016.1171249.
  • Marcellini, A., M. Vidal, S. Ferez, and E. Léséleuc De. 2010. “La chose la plus rapide sans jambes. Oscar Pistorius ou la mise en spectacle des frontières de l’humain.” Politix 90 (2): 139–165. doi:10.3917/pox.090.0139.
  • McRuer, R. 2006. Crip Theory: Cultural Signs of Queerness and Disability. New York, NY: New.
  • Merleau-Ponty, M. 1945. Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard.
  • Novak, D., P. Wolf, and E. Guglielmelli. 2017. “Cybathlon 2016: Showcasing Advances in Assistive Technologies through Competition.” IEEE Robotics Automation Magazine 24 (4): 24–122. doi:10.1109/MRA.2017.2757721.
  • Papadimitriou, C. 2008. “Becoming En-Wheeled: The Situated Accomplishment of Re- Embodiment as a Wheelchair User after Spinal Cord Injury.” Disability & Society 23 (7): 691–704. doi:10.1080/09687590802469420.
  • Purdue, D. E. J., and P. D. Howe. 2012. “See the Sport, Not the Disability: Exploring the Paralympic Paradox.” Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 4 (2): 189–205. doi:10.1080/2159676X.2012.685102.
  • Purdue, D. E. J., and P. D. Howe. 2013. “Who’s in and Who Is Out? Legitimate Bodies within the Paralympic Games.” Sociology of Sport Journal 30 (1): 24–40. doi:10.1123/ssj.30.1.24.
  • Reiner, R. 2016. “The Cybathlon Promotes the Development of Assistive Technology for People with Physical Disabilities.” Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. doi:10.1186/s12984-016-0157-2.
  • Richard, R. 2017. Être footballeur en fauteuil. Approche socio-phénoménologique du corps sportif en situation de handicap. Paris: l’Harmattan.
  • Richard, R., and J. André. 2017. “Cyborg ou/et handi-capable? L’expérience du corps capacitaire chez des participants au Cybathlon.” Recherches & éducations 1 (1): 67–79.
  • Schantz, O. J., and K. Gilbert. 2001. “An Ideal Misconstrued: Newspaper Coverage of the Atlanta Paralympic Games in France and Germany.” Sociology of Sport Journal 18 (1): 69–94. doi:10.1123/ssj.18.1.69.
  • Schell, L. A., and M. C. Duncan. 1999. “A Content Analysis of CBS’s Coverage of the 1996 Paralympic Games.” Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly 16 (1): 27–47. doi:10.1123/apaq.16.1.27.
  • Shilling, C. 2005. The Body in Culture, Technology and Society. London: Sage.
  • Silva, C. F., and P. D. Howe. 2012. “Difference, Adapted Physical Activity and Human Development: Potential Contribution of Capabilities Approach.” Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly 29 (1): 25–43. doi:10.1123/apaq.29.1.25.
  • Statthaler, K., A. Schwarz, D. Steyrl, R. Kobler, M. K. Höller, J. Brandstetter, L. Hehenberger, M. Bigga, and G. Müller-Putz. 2017. ““Cybathlon Experiences of the Graz BCI Racing Team Mirage91 in the Brain-Computer Interface Discipline.”.” Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 14 (1): 129. doi:10.1186/s12984-017-0320-4.
  • Thomas, N., and A. Smith. 2003. “Preoccupied with Able-Bodiedness? an Analysis of the British Media Coverage of the 2000 Paralympic Games.” Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly 20 (2): 166–181. doi:10.1123/apaq.20.2.166.
  • Weaving, C., and J. Samson. 2018. “The Naked Truth: Disability, Sexual Objectification, and the ESPN Body Issue.” Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 45 (1): 83–100. doi:10.1080/00948705.2018.1427592.
  • Wiener, N. 1961. Cybernetics – Or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. Cambrige: MIT Press.
  • Winance, M. 2006. “Trying Out the Wheelchair: The Mutual Shaping of People and Devices through Adjustment.” Science, Technology & Human Values 31 (1): 52–72. doi:10.1177/0162243905280023.
  • Wolbring, G. 2010. “Nanotechnology and the Transhumanization of Health, Medicine, and Rehabilitation.” In In Controversies in Science and Technology Volume 3: From Evolution to Energy, edited by L. Kleinmann, J. Delborne, K. Cloud-Hansen, and J. Handelsman, 286–298. New York: Leibert.
  • Wolbring, G. 2018. “Prostheses and Other Equipment: The Issue of the Cyborg Athlete. Interrogating the Media Coverage of the Cybathlon 2016 Event.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Paralympic Studies, edited by I. Brittain and A. Beacom, 439–459. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.