The poetics of everyday movement: human movement ecology and urban walking

References

• Althoff, T., R. Sosič, J. L. Hicks, A. C. King, D. L. Delp, and J. Leskovec. 2017. “Large-scale Physical Activity Data Reveal Worldwide Activity Inequality.” Nature 547 (7663): 336–339. doi:10.1038/nature23018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrada, E., R. Müller, and R. Blickhan. 2016. “Stability in Skipping Gaits.” The Royal Society Open Science 3 (11): 160602. doi:10.1098/rsos.160602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrieu, B., and S. Loland. 2017. “The Ecology of Sport: From the Practice of Body Ecology to Emersed Leisure.” Loisir Et Societé/Society and Leisure 40 (1): 1–6. doi:10.1080/07053436.2017.1282200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrieu, B., J. S. Parry, A. Porrovecchio, and O. Sirost, eds. 2018. Body Ecology and Emersive Leisure. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, M. V. D., M. Van Poppel, I. Van Kamp, S. Andrusaityte, B. Balseviciene, M. Cirach, A. Danileviciute et al. 2016. “Visiting Green Space Is Associated with Mental Health and Vitality: A Cross-sectional Study in Four European Cities.” Health and Place 38 (3): 8–15. DOI:10.1016/j.healthplace.2016.01.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blassingame, L. 1998. “Sustainable Cities: Oxymoron, Utopia, or Inevitability?” The Social Science Journal 35 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1016/S0362-3319(98)90055-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, A., and Y. S. Lo. 2014. Understanding Environmental Philosophy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carlisle, C. 2014. On Habit. Thinking in Action. Oxon UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Diehm, C. 2007. “Identification with Nature: What It Is and Why It Matters.” Ethics and the Environment 12 (2): 1–22. doi:10.2979/ETE.2007.12.2.1.
   Google Scholar
• Engel, L. 2008. “The Dance of the Now– Poetics of Everyday Movement.” Forum: Qualitative Social Research 9 (2): 35.
   Google Scholar
• Eremia, M., L. Toma, and M. Sandulaec. 2017. “The Smart City Concept in the 21st Century.” Procedia Engineering 181: 12–19. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2017.02.357.
   Google Scholar
• Ewing, R., and S. Handy. 2009. “Measuring the Unmeasurable: Urban Design Qualities Related to Walkability.” Journal of Urban Design 14 (1): 65–84. doi:10.1080/13574800802451155.
   Google Scholar
• Gidlow, C. J., M. V. Jones, G. Hurst, D. Masterson, D. Clark-Carter, M. Tarvainen, G. Smith, and M. Nieuwenhuijsen. 2016. “Where to Put Your Best Foot Forward: Psycho-physiological Responses to Walking in Natural and Urban Environments.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 45: 22–29. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gros, F. 2014. A Philosophy of Walking. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. 1993. “The Temporality of the Landscape.” World Archeology 25 (2): 152–174. doi:10.1080/00438243.1993.9980235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loland, S. 1996. “Outline of an Ecosophy of Sport.” Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 23 (1): 70–90. doi:10.1080/00948705.1996.9714532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loland, S. 2008. “Alpine Skiing Technique - Practical Knowledge and Scientific Analysis.” In Science and Skiing IV, edited by E. Müller, S. Lindinger, and T. Stöggl, 43–58. Aachen: Meyer & Meyer Sport.
   Google Scholar
• Martinkova, I. 2015. “Phenomenology and Sport.” In Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Sport, edited by W. J. Morgan and M. McNamee, 178–191. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzoleni, I. 2013. Architecture Follows Nature. Biomimetic Principles for Innovative Design. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• McPhearson, T., S. T. A. Pickett, N. B. Grimm, J. Niemelä, M. Alberti, T. Elmqvist, C. Weber, D. Haase, J. Breuste, and S. Qureshi. 2016. “Advancing Urban Ecology toward a Science of Cities.” BioScience 66 (3): 198–212. DOI:10.1093/biosci/biw002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. 1978. Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Metheny, E. 1968. Meaning and Movement. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Minteer, B. A. 2017. “Environmental Ethics, Sustainability Science, and the Recovery of Pragmatism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Environmental Ethics, edited by S. M. Gardiner and A. Thompson, 528–540. New York: Oxford UP.
   Google Scholar
• Næss, A. 1989. Ecology, Community & Lifestyle. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Næss, A. 1993. “Sustainability! The Integral Approach.” Paradigms 7 (1): 66–72. doi:10.1080/13600829308443040.
   Google Scholar
• Niemitz, C. 2010. “The Evolution of the Upright Posture and Gait—a Review and a New Synthesis.” Die Naturwissenschaften 97 (3): 241–263. doi:10.1007/s00114-009-0637-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Mara, S. 2019. In Praise of Walking. The New Science of How We Walk and Why It Is Good for Us. London: Bodley Head.
   Google Scholar
• Oppezzo, M., and D. L. Schwartz. 2014. “Give Your Ideas Some Legs: The Positive Effect of Walking on Creative Thinking.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 40 (4): 1142–1152. doi:10.1037/a0036577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organization, W. H. (2018). “Global Action Plan on Physical Activity 2018–2030: More Active People for a Healthier World.” Accessed 22 September 2020. https://www.who.int/ncds/prevention/physical-activity/global-action-plan-2018-2030/en/
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, A., C. Desha, D. Hargreaves, K. Hargroves, and P. Geoffrey Shen. 2015. “Biophilic Urbanism: Contributions to Holistic Urban Greening for Urban Renewal.” Smart and Sustainable Built Environments 4 (2): 215–233. doi:10.1108/SASBE-11-2014-0057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren, L., R. K. Jones, and D. Howard. 2007. “Predictive Modelling of Human Walking over a Complete Gait Cycle.” Journal of Biomechanics 40 (7): 1567–1574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Routley, R. 2009. “Is There a Need for a New, an Environmental, Ethic?” In Encyclopedia of Environmental Ethics and Philosophy, edited by J. Baird Callicott and R. Frodeman, 484–489. Farmington Hills, Mass: Macmillan Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Sallis, J. F., E. Cerin, T. L. Conway, M. A. Adams, L. D. Frank, M. Pratt, D. Salvo et al. 2016. “Physical Activity in Relation to Urban Environments in 14 Cities Worldwide: A Cross-sectional Study.” Lancet 387 (10034): 2207–2217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seamon, D. (2010). “Merleau-Ponty, Perception, and Environmental Embodiment: Implications for Architectural and Environmental Studies.” https://www.academia.edu/948750/Merleau-Ponty_Perception_and_Environmental_Embodiment_Implications_for_Architectural_and_Environmental_Studies_forthcoming_
   Google Scholar
• Simon, D. 2016. Rethinking Sustainable Cities. Accessible, Green and Fair. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, A. 2017. “Anthropocentrism: Humanity as Peril and Promise.” In The Oxford Handbook of Environmental Ethics, edited by S. M. Gardiner and A. Thompson, 77–90. New York: Oxford UP.
   Google Scholar
• Visvader, J. 2017. “Philosophy and Human Ecology.” Human Ecology Review 23 (2): 125–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welters, R. 2019. Towards a Sustainable Philosophy of Endurance Sports. Cycling for Life. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford UP.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, S. 2019. “Ecological Holism: Arne Naess’s Gestalt Ontology and Merleau-Ponty’s Bodily-flesh Phenomenology.” In Practical Spirituality and Human Development, edited by A. Giri, 437–453. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Zurawik, M. A. 2014. “Socio-ecological Perspective on Walking.” Coldnoon: Travel Poetics 3 (1): 81–98.
   Google Scholar