Bias correction for parameter estimates of spatial point process models

References

• Lindsay B. Composite likelihood. In: Prabhu N, editor. Statistical inference from stochastic processes. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society; 1988. p. 221–239.
   Google Scholar
• Agterberg F. Automatic contouring of geological maps to detect target areas for mineral exploration. J. Int. Assoc. Math. Geol. 1974;6:373–395. doi: 10.1007/BF02082358
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley A, Turner R. Practical maximum pseudolikelihood for spatial point patterns (with discussion). Aust. N. Z. J. Stat. 2000;42:283–322. doi: 10.1111/1467-842X.00128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman M, Turner T. Approximating point process likelihoods with GLIM. Appl. Stat. 1992;41:31–38. doi: 10.2307/2347614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brillinger D. Comparative aspects of the study of ordinary time series and of point processes. In: Krishnaiah P, editor. Developments in statistics. London: Academic Press; 1978. p. 33–133.
   Google Scholar
• Brillinger D, Segundo J. Empirical examination of the threshold model of neuron firing. Biol. Cybernet. 1979;35:213–220. doi: 10.1007/BF00344204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brillinger D, Preisler H. Two examples of quantal data analysis: (a) multivariate point process, (b) pure death process in an experimental design. In: Proceedings of the XIII International Biometric Conference, Seattle. Washington, DC: International Biometric Society; 1986. p. 94–113.
   Google Scholar
• Clyde M, Strauss D. Logistic regression for spatial pair-potential models. In: Possolo A, editor. Spatial statistics and imaging. Hayward, CA: Institute of Mathematical Statistics; 1991. Chapter II. p. 14–30.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis P. Recent results in the statistical analysis of univariate point processes. In: Lewis P, editor. Stochastic point processes. New York: Wiley; 1972. p. 1–54.
   Google Scholar
• Tukey J. Discussion of paper by F.P. Agterberg and S.C. Robinson. Bull. Int. Statist. Inst. 1972;44:596. Proceedings, 38th Congress, International Statistical Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley A, Turner R. Spatstat: an R package for analyzing spatial point patterns. J. Statist. Softw. 2005;12:1–42. Available from www.jstatsoft.org, ISSN: 1548–7660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wager C, Coull B, Lange N. Modelling spatial intensity for replicated inhomogeneous point patterns in brain imaging. J. R. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 2004;66:429–446. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-7412.2003.05285.x
   Google Scholar
• Besag J. Some methods of statistical analysis for spatial data. Bull. Int. Statist. Inst. 1977;47:77–91.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen J, Møller J. Pseudolikelihood for exponential family models of spatial point processes. Ann. Appl. Probab. 1991;1:445–461. doi: 10.1214/aoap/1177005877
   Google Scholar
• Illian J, Penttinen A, Stoyan H, Stoyan D. Statistical analysis and modelling of spatial point patterns. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Coeurjolly JF, Drouilhet R. Asymptotic properties of the maximum pseudolikelihood estimator for stationary Gibbs point processes including the Lennard–Jones model. Electron. J. Stat. 2010;4:677–706. doi: 10.1214/09-EJS494
   Google Scholar
• Jensen J, Künsch H. On asymptotic normality of pseudolikelihood estimates for pairwise interaction processes. Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. 1994;46:475–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley A, Berman M, Fisher N, Hardegen A, Milne R, Schuhmacher D, Shah R, Turner R. Spatial logistic regression and change-of-support for Poisson point processes. Electron. J. Stat. 2010;4:1151–1201. doi: 10.1214/10-EJS581
   Google Scholar
• Huang F, Ogata Y. Improvements of the maximum pseudo-likelihood estimators in various spatial statistical models. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 1999;8:510–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson L. The approximate arithmetical solution by finite differences of physical problems including differential equations, with an application to the stresses in a masonry dam. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 1911;210: 307–357. doi: 10.1098/rsta.1911.0009
   Google Scholar
• Richardson L, Gaunt J. The deferred approach to the limit. Part I. Single lattice. Part II. Interpenetrating lattices. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 1927;226:299–361. doi: 10.1098/rsta.1927.0008
   Google Scholar
• Brezinski C, Zaglia MR. Extrapolation methods. Theory and practice. Amsterdam: North-Holland; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Scholtz S. Location choice models in Sparta. In: Arkansas RL III, Ottinger J, Scholtz S, Limp W, Watkins B, Jones RD, editors. Settlement predictions in Sparta: A locational analysis and cultural resource assessment on the uplands of Calhoun County. Fayetteville, AR: Arkansas Archaeological Survey; 1981. p. 207–222.
   Google Scholar
• Hasenstab R. A preliminary cultural resource sensitivity analysis for the proposed flood control facilities construction in the Passaic River Basin of New Jersey. New York: Soil Systems, Inc.; 1983. Submitted to the Passaic River Basin Special Studies Branch, Department of the Army, USA. New York District Army Corps of Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Kvamme K. Computer processing techniques for regional modeling of archaeological site locations. Adv. Comput. Archaeol. 1983;1:26–52.
   Google Scholar
• Kvamme K. A view from across the water: the North American experience in archeological GIS. In: Lock G, Stanc˘ic˘ Z, editors. Archaeology and geographical information systems: a European perspective. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1995. p. 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Chung C, Agterberg F. Regression models for estimating mineral resources from geological map data. Math. Geol. 1980;12:473–488. doi: 10.1007/BF01028881
   Google Scholar
• Chung C, Fabbri A. Probabilistic prediction models for landslide hazard mapping. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 1999;62:1389–1399.
   Google Scholar
• Gorsevski P, Gessler P, Folz R, Elliott W. Spatial prediction of landslide hazard using logistic regression and ROC analysis. Trans. GIS 2006;10:395–415. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9671.2006.01004.x
   Google Scholar
• Bonham-Carter G. Geographic information systems for geoscientists: modelling with GIS. No. 13 in Computer Methods in the Kidlington. Oxford: Geosciences Pergamon Press/Elsevier; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• McCullagh P, Nelder J. Generalized linear models. 2nd ed. London: Chapman and Hall; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Dobson A, Barnett A. An introduction to generalized linear models. 3rd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Hosmer D, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss D. A model for clustering. Biometrika 1975;63:467–475. doi: 10.1093/biomet/62.2.467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly F, Ripley B. A note on Strauss's model for clustering. Biometrika 1976;63:357–360. doi: 10.1093/biomet/63.2.357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berthelsen K, Møller J. A primer on perfect simulation for spatial point processes. Bull. Braz. Math. Soc. 2002;33:351–367. doi: 10.1007/s005740200019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley A, Jensen EV. Stereology for statisticians. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2005.
   Google Scholar