The computation of average run length and average time to signal: an overview

References

• Shewhart WA. The application of statistics as an aid in maintaining quality of a manufactured product. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 1925;20:546–548. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1925.10502930
   Google Scholar
• Page ES. Continuous inspection schemes. Biometrika 1954;41:100–115. doi: 10.1093/biomet/41.1-2.100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robert SW. Control chart test based on geometric moving averages. Technometrics 1959;1:239–250. doi: 10.1080/00401706.1959.10489860
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery DC. Introduction to statistical quality control. 6th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Oakland JS. Statistical process control. 5th ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan TP. Statistical methods for quality improvement. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins DM, Owell DH. Cumulative sum charts and charting for quality improvement. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Wetherill GB, Brown DW. Statistical process control. 3rd ed. London: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Prabhu SS, Montgomery DC, Runger GC. A combined adaptive sample size and sampling interval control schemes. J. Qual. Tech. 1994;26(3):164–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa AFB. Joint and R charts with variable parameters. IIE Trans. 1998;30:505–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen YK, Chiou KC. Optimal design of VSI control charts for monitoring correlated samples. Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 2005;21:757–768. doi: 10.1002/qre.684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celano G, Costa AFB, Fichera S. Statistical design of variable sample size and sampling interval control charts with run rules. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2006;28:966–977. doi: 10.1007/s00170-004-2444-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds MR, Jr., Amin RW, Arnold JC. CUSUM charts with variable sampling intervals. Technometrics. 1990;32:371–384. doi: 10.1080/00401706.1990.10484721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Wu Z. A CUSUM scheme with variable sample sizes for monitoring process shifts. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2007;33:977–987. doi: 10.1007/s00170-006-0544-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Z, Zhang S, Wang P. A CUSUM scheme with variable sample sizes and sampling intervals for monitoring the process mean and variance. Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 2007;23:157–170. doi: 10.1002/qre.782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds MR, Jr. Shewhart and EWMA variable sampling interval control charts with sampling at fixed times. J. Qual. Tech. 1996;28(2):199–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds MR, Jr., Arnold JC. EWMA control charts with variable sample sizes and variable sampling intervals. IIE Trans. 2001;33:511–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Luo Y, Wang Z. Cusum of Q chart with variable sampling intervals for monitoring the process mean. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2010;48(16):4861–4876. doi: 10.1080/00207540903074983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Wang Z. An exponentially weighted moving average scheme with variable sampling intervals for monitoring linear profiles. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2010;59(4):630–637. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2010.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu JY, Xie M, Goh TN, Liu QH, Yang ZH. Cumulative count of conforming chart with variable sampling intervals. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2006;101:286–297. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aparisi F, Haro LC. Hotelling's T2 control chart with variable sampling intervals. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2001;39(14):3127–3140. doi: 10.1080/00207540110054597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brook D, Evans DA. An approach to the probability distribution of CUSUM run length. Biometrika 1972;59:539–549. doi: 10.1093/biomet/59.3.539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowder SV. A simple method for studying run length distribution of exponentially weighted moving average control charts. Technometrics. 1987;29:401–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han D, Tsung F. A generalized EWMA control chart and its comparison with the optimal EWMA, CUSUM and GLR schemes. Ann. Statist. 2004;32(1):316–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han D, Tsung F. A reference-free cuscore chart for dynamic mean change detection and a unified framework for charting performance comparison. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 2006;101:368–386. doi: 10.1198/016214505000000556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds MR, Jr. An approximations to the average run length in cumulative sum control charts. Technometrics 1975;17(1):65–71. doi: 10.1080/00401706.1975.10489273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson PB, Ho TY. Average run length of geometric moving average chats by numerical methods. Technometrics 1978;20:85–93. doi: 10.1080/00401706.1978.10489620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodall WH. The distribution of the run length of one-sided CUSUM procedures for continuous random variables. Technometrics 1983;25(3):295–301. doi: 10.1080/00401706.1983.10487883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold MS. The geometric approximation to the cusum run length distribution. Biometrika 1989;76:725–733. doi: 10.1093/biomet/76.4.725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champ CW, Rigdon SE. A comparison of the Markov chain and the integral equation approach for evaluating the run length distribution of quality control charts. J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 1991;20(1):191–204. doi: 10.1080/03610919108812948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shu L, Jiang W. A Markov chain model for the adaptive CUSUM control chart. J. Qual. Tech. 2006;38(2):135–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins DM. Evaluation of the average run length of cumulative sum charts for an arbitrary data distribution. Commun. Stat. Simul. C. 1992;21:1001–1020. doi: 10.1080/03610919208813063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorden G. Procedures for reacting to a change in distribution. Ann. Math. Statist. 1971;42:1897–1908. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177693055
   Google Scholar
• Pollak M. Optimal detection of a change in distribution. Ann. Statist. 1985;13:206–227. doi: 10.1214/aos/1176346587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegmund D. Sequential analysis: tests and confidence intervals. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Moustakides GV. Optimal stopping times for detecting changes in distributions. Ann. Statist. 1986;14(4):1379–1387. doi: 10.1214/aos/1176350164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparks RS. CUSUM charts for signalling varying locations shifts. J. Qual. Tech. 2000;32:157–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Wang Z. Adaptive CUSUM of the Q chart. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2010;48(5):1287–1301. doi: 10.1080/00207540802484937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quesenberry CP. SPC Q charts for start-up processes and short or long runs. J. Qual. Tech. 1991;23(3):213–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dobben de Bruyn CS. Cumulative sum test: theory and practice. London: Griffin; 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas JM, Crosier RB. Fast initial response for CUSUM quality control schemes: give your CUSUM a head start. Technometrics 1982;24:199–205. doi: 10.1080/00401706.1982.10487759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yashchin E. On a unified approach to the analysis of two-sided cumulative sum control schemes with head starts. Adv. Appl. Probab. 1985;17(3):562–593. doi: 10.2307/1427120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodall WH. On the Markov chain approach to the two-sided CUSUM procedure. Technometrics 1984;26(1):41–46. doi: 10.1080/00401706.1984.10487920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan FF. Exact run length distribution for one-sided exponential CUSUM scheme. Statist. Sinica. 1992;2: 297–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones LA, Champ CW, Rigdon SE. The run length distribution of the CUSUM with estimated parameters. J. Qual. Tech. 2004;36:95–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luceno A, Puig-pey J. Evaluation of the run-length probability distribution for CUSUM charts: assessing chart performance. Technometrics 2000;42(4):411–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas JM, Saccucci MS. Exponentially weighted moving average control schemes: properties and enhancements. Technometrics 1990;32(1):1–29. doi: 10.1080/00401706.1990.10484583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saccucci MS, Lucas JM. Average run length for exponentially weighted moving average control schemes using the Markov chain approach. J. Qual. Tech. 1990;22(2):154–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capizzi G, Masarotto G. An adaptive exponentially weighted moving average control chart. Technometrics 2003;45:199–203. doi: 10.1198/004017003000000023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Tsung F, Wang Z. Dual CUSUM scheme for detecting the range shift in the mean. IIE Trans. 2005;37: 1047–1058. doi: 10.1080/07408170500232321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aarts EH, Van Laarhoven PJM. Simulated annealing: an introduction. Stat. Neerl. 1989;43:31–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9574.1989.tb01245.x
   Google Scholar
• Saleh NA, Mahmoud MA, Abdel-Salam A-SG. The performance of the adaptive exponentially weighted moving average control chart with estimated parameters. Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. doi: 10.1002/qre.1408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan FF. Exponentially weighted moving average control charts with reflecting boundaries. J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 1993;46:45–67. doi: 10.1080/00949659308811492
   Google Scholar
• Gan FF. Designs of one- and two-sided exponential EWMA charts. J. Qual. Tech. 1998;30:55–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Wang Z, Wu Z. Necessary and sufficient conditions for non-interaction of a pair of one-sided EWMA schemes with reflecting boundaries. Statist. Probab. Lett. 2009;79:368–374. doi: 10.1016/j.spl.2008.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones LA, Champ CW, Rigdon SE. The performance of exponentially weighted moving average charts with estimated parameters. Technometrics 2001;43:156–167. doi: 10.1198/004017001750386279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones LA. The statistical design of EWMA control charts with estimated parameters. J. Qual. Tech. 2002;34(3): 277–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champ CW, Woodall WH. Exact result for Shewhart control charts with supplementary run rules. Technometrics 1987;29(4):393–399. doi: 10.1080/00401706.1987.10488266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas JM. Combined Shewhart-CUSUM quality control schemes. J. Qual. Tech. 1982;12:51–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas JM, Crosier RB. Robust CUSUM: a robustness study for CUSUM quality control schemes. Comm. Statist. Theory Methods 1982;11:2669–2687. doi: 10.1080/03610928208828414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu JC, Shmueli G, Chang YM. A unified Markov chain approach for computing the run length distribution in control charts with simple or compound rules. Statist. Probab. Lett. 2003;65:457–466. doi: 10.1016/j.spl.2003.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan FF. Combined cumulative sum and Shewhart variance charts. J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 1989;32(3):149–163. doi: 10.1080/00949658908811171
   Google Scholar
• Calzada ME, Scariano SM. Joint monitoring of the mean and variance of combined control charts with estimated parameters. Comm. Statist. Simul. Comput. 2007;36:1115–1134. doi: 10.1080/03610910701540052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds MR Jr., Amin RW, Arnold JC, Nachlas JA. charts with variable sampling intervals. Technometrics 1988;30:181–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery DC. SPC research – current trends. Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 2007;23:515–516. doi: 10.1002/qre.888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa AFB. X-bar chart with variable parameters. J. Qual. Tech. 1999;31:408–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo Y, Li Z, Wang Z. Adaptive CUSUM control chart with variable sampling intervals. Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 2009;53(7):2693–2701. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2009.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds MR, Jr. Variable-sampling-interval control charts with sampling at fixed times. IIE Trans. 1996;28: 497–510. doi: 10.1080/07408179608966297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosier RB. A new two-sided cumulative sum quality control scheme. Technometrics 1986;28:187–194. doi: 10.1080/00401706.1986.10488126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou C, Wang Z, Tsung F. Monitoring an autocorrelated processes using variable sampling schemes at fixed-times. Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 2008;28:55–69. doi: 10.1002/qre.867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runger GC, Prabhu SS. A Markov chain model for the multivariate exponentially weighted moving average control chart. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 1996;91(436):1701–1706. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1996.10476741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Zou C, Wang Z. A control chart based on likelihood ratio for monitoring process mean and variability. Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 2010;26:63–73. doi: 10.1002/qre.1036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Zhang J, Wang Z. Self-starting control chart for simultaneously monitoring process mean and variance. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2010;48(15):4537–4553. doi: 10.1080/00207540903051692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin RW, Letsinger W. Improved switching rules in control procedures using variable sampling intervals. Comm. Statist. Simul. Comput. 1991;20:205–230. doi: 10.1080/03610919108812949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wald A. Sequential analysis. New York: Wiley; 1947.
   Google Scholar
• Woodall WH, Montgomery DC. Research issues and ideas in statistical process control. J. Qual. Tech. 1999;31: 376–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoumbos ZG, Reynolds MR, Jr., Ryan TP, Woodall WH. The state of statistical process control as we proceed into the 21st century. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 2000;95:992–998. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2000.10474292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bersimis S, Psarakis S, Panaretos J. Multivariate statistical process control charts: an overview. Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 2007;23:517–543. doi: 10.1002/qre.829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai Y, Luo Y, Li Z, Wang Z. A new adaptive CUSUM control chart for detecting the multivariate process mean. Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 2011;27(7):877–884. doi: 10.1002/qre.1177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croisier RB. Multivariate generalizations of cumulative sum quality-control schemes. Technometrics 1988;30: 243–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowry CA, Woodall WH, Champ CW, Rigdon SE. Multivariate exponentially weighted moving average control chart. Technometrics 1992;34:46–53. doi: 10.2307/1269551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goel AL, Wu SM. Determination of ARL and a contour nomogram for cusum charts to control normal mean. Technometrics 1971;13(2):221–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar