Multiresolution analysis of linearly oriented spatial point patterns

REFERENCES

• Goodall DW. Some considerations in the use of point quadrats for the analysis of vegetation. Aust J Sci Res B: Biol Sci. 1952;5:1–41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Matérn B. Spatial variation. Stochastic models and their application to some problems in forest surveys and other sampling investigations. Medd Statens Skogsforskningsinstitut. 1960;49(5):1–135.
   Google Scholar
• Matérn B. Spatial variation. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Pielou EC. Mathematical ecology. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Ripley BD. Spatial statistics. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Hodder I, Orton C. Spatial analysis in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Neyman J, Scott EL. Statistical approach to problems of cosmology (with discussion). J R Stat Soc B. 1958;20:1–43.
   Google Scholar
• Cliff AD, Ord JK. Spatial processes. Models and applications. London: Pion; 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Ogata Y. Space–time point process models for earthquake occurrences. Ann Inst Stat Math. 1998;50:379–402. doi: 10.1023/A:1003403601725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diggle PJ, Richardson S. Epidemiological studies of industrial pollutants: an introduction. Int Stat Rev. 1993;61: 203–206. doi: 10.2307/1403623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoyan D, Kendall W, Mecke J. Stochastic geometry and its applications. 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Diggle PJ. Statistical analysis of spatial point patterns. London: Arnold; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley A, Gregori P, Mateu J, Stoica R, Stoyan D, editors. Case studies in spatial point process modeling. Lecture Notes in Statistics. Vol. 185. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Illian J, Penttinen A, Stoyan H, Stoyan D. Statistical analysis and modeling of spatial point patterns. Chichester: Wiley; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Gelfand AE, Diggle PJ, Fuentes M, Guttorp P, editors. Handbook of spatial statistics. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Ohser J, Stoyan D. On the second-order and orientation analysis of planar stationary point processes. Biom J. 1981;23:523–533. doi: 10.1002/bimj.4710230602
   Google Scholar
• Stoyan D, Benes V. Anisotropy analysis for particle systems. J Microsc. 1991;164:159–168. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1991.tb03201.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mateu J. Second-order characteristics of spatial marked processes with applications. Nonlinear Anal: Real World Appl. 2000;1:145–162. doi: 10.1016/S0362-546X(99)00398-3
   Google Scholar
• Redenbach C, Särkkä A, Freitag J, Schladitz K. Anisotropy analysis of pressed point processes. Adv Stat Anal. 2009;93:237–261. doi: 10.1007/s10182-009-0106-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovalev VA, Bondar YS. A method for anisotropy analysis of 3D images. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 1296. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on computer analysis of images and patterns. Berlin: Springer; 1997. p. 495–502.
   Google Scholar
• Møller J, Rasmussen JG. A sequential point process model and Bayesian inference for spatial point patterns with linear structures. Scand J Stat. 2012;39:618–634. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9469.2011.00769.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schenk HJ, Mahall BE. Positive and negative interactions contribute to a north–south-patterned association between two desert shrub species. Oecologia. 2002;132:402–410. doi: 10.1007/s00442-002-0990-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg MS. Wavelet analysis for detecting anisotropy in point patterns. J Veg Sci. 2004;15:277–284. doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2004.tb02262.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman M. Spatial statistics and spatio-temporal data. Covariance functions and directional properties. Chichester: Wiley; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Guan Y, Sherman M, Calvin JA. A nonparametric test for spatial isotropy using subsampling. J Am Stat Assoc Theory Methods. 2004;99:810–821. doi: 10.1198/016214504000001150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan Y, Sherman M, Calvin JA. Assessing isotropy for spatial point processes. Biometrics. 2006;62:119–125. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00436.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mugglestone M, Renshaw E. Detection of geological lineations on aerial photographs using two-dimensional spectral analysis. Comput Geosci. 1998;24:771–784. doi: 10.1016/S0098-3004(98)00065-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donoho DL. Nonlinear wavelet methods for recovery of signals, densities, and spectra from indirect and noisy data. In: Daubechies I, editor. Different perspectives on wavelets. Providence: American Mathematical Society; 1993. p. 173–205.
   Google Scholar
• Gao W, Li BL. Wavelet analysis of coherent structures at the atmosphere–forest interface. J Appl Meteorol. 1993;32:1717–1725. doi: 10.1175/1520-0450(1993)032<1717:WAOCSA>2.0.CO;2
   Google Scholar
• Grenfell N, Bjørnstad BTO, Kappey J. Travelling waves and spatial hierarchies in measles epidemics. Nature. 2001;414:716–723. doi: 10.1038/414716a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders SC, Chen J, Crow TR, Brofoske KD. Hierarchical relationships between landscape structure and temperature in a managed forest landscape. Landscape Ecol. 1998;13:381–395. doi: 10.1023/A:1008097011008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brosofske KD, Chen J, Crow TR, Saunders SC. Vegetation responses to landscape structure at multiple scales across a Northern Wisconsin, USA, pine barrens landscape. Plant Ecol. 1999;143:203–318. doi: 10.1023/A:1009768115186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper KA, Macdonald SE. Structure and composition of riparian boreal forest: new methods for analyzing edge influence. Ecology. 2001;82:649–659. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[0649:SACORB]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry JN, Liebhold AM, Rosenberg MS, Dungan J, Miriti M, Jakomulska A, Citron-Pousty S. Illustrations and guidelines for selecting statistical methods for quantifying spatial pattern in ecological data. Ecography. 2002;25:578–600. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0587.2002.250507.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haar A. Zur Theorie der orthogonalen Funktionensysteme. Math Ann. 1910;69:331–371. doi: 10.1007/BF01456326
   Google Scholar
• Mallat S. A wavelet tour of signal processing. 2nd ed. Burlington, MA: Elsevier; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Vidakovic B. Statistical modeling by wavelets. New York: Wiley; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Neupauer RM, Powell KL. A fully-anisotropic Morlet wavelet to identify dominant orientations in a porous medium. Comput Geosci. 2005;31:465–471. doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2004.10.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar P. A wavelet based methodology for scale-space anisotropic analysis. Geophys Res Lett. 1995;22:2777–2780. doi: 10.1029/95GL02934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Møller J, Waagepetersen RP. Statistical inference and simulation for spatial point processes. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Møller J, Syversveen AR, Waagepetersen RP. Log Gaussian Cox processes. Scand J Stat. 1998;25:451–482. doi: 10.1111/1467-9469.00115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Møller J. Shot noise Cox processes. Adv Appl Probab. 2003;35:614–640. doi: 10.1239/aap/1059486821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolpert RL, Ickstadt K. Poisson/gamma random field models for spatial statistics. Biometrika. 1998;85:251–267. doi: 10.1093/biomet/85.2.251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jalilian A, Guan Y, Waagepetersen R. Decomposition of variance for spatial Cox processes. Scand J Stat. 2012; 40:119–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miriti MN, Howe HF, Wright SJ. Spatial patterns of mortality in a Colorado desert plant community. Plant Ecol. 1998;136:41–51. doi: 10.1023/A:1009711311970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar