Inference on progressive-stress model for the exponentiated exponential distribution under type-II progressive hybrid censoring

References

• Chan CK. A proportional hazard approach to correlate SiO2 breakdown voltage & time distributions. IEEE Trans Reliab. 1990;39:147–150. doi: 10.1109/24.55873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin XK, Sheng BZ. Some aspects of accelerated life testing by progressive stress. IEEE Trans Reliab. 1987;R-36:150–155. doi: 10.1109/TR.1987.5222320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai DS, Cha MS, Chung SW. Optimum simple ramp-tests for the Weibull distribution and type-I censoring. IEEE Trans Reliab. 1992;41:407–413. doi: 10.1109/24.159808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronghua W, Heliang F. Statistical inference of Weibull distribution for tampered failure rate model in progressive stress accelerated life testing. J Syst Sci Complex. 2004;17:237–243.
   Google Scholar
• Abdel-Hamid AH, AL-Hussaini EK. Progressive stress accelerated life tests under finite mixture models. Metrika. 2007;66:213–231. doi: 10.1007/s00184-006-0106-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdel-Hamid AH, AL-Hussaini EK. Bayesian prediction for type-II progressive-censored data from the Rayleigh distribution under progressive-stress model. J Stat Comput Simul. 2013; doi:10.1080/00949655.2012.741132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen SM, Bhattacharya GK. Exact confidence bounds for an exponential parameter hybrid censoring. Commun Stat Theory Methods. 1988;17:1858–1870.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta RD, Kundu D. Hybrid censoring schemes with exponential failure distribution. Commun Stat Theory Methods. 1998;27:3065–3083. doi: 10.1080/03610929808832273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundu D. On hybrid censored Weibull distribution. J Stat Plan Inference. 2007;137:2127–2142. doi: 10.1016/j.jspi.2006.06.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan N, Xie Q. Exact inference for a simple step-stress model with type-II hybrid censored data from the exponential distribution. J Stat Plan Inference. 2007;137:2543–2563. doi: 10.1016/j.jspi.2006.04.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee A, Kundu D. Inference based on Type-II hybrid censored data from a Weibull distribution. IEEE Trans Reliab. 2008;57:369–378. doi: 10.1109/TR.2008.916890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AL-Hussaini EK, Osman MI. On the median of a finite mixture. J Stat Comput Simul. 1997;58:121–144. doi: 10.1080/00949659708811826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson W. Accelerated testing: statistical models, test plans and data analysis. New York: Wiley; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Meeker WQ, Escobar LA. Statistical method for reliability data. New York: Wiley; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmadi J, Jozani MJ, Marchand E, Parsian A. Bayes estimation based on k-record data from a general class of distributions under balanced type loss functions. J Stat Plan Inference. 2009;139:1180–1189. doi: 10.1016/j.jspi.2008.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadi J, Jozani MJ, Marchand E, Parsian A. Prediction of k-records from a general class of distributions under balanced type loss functions. Metrika. 2009;70:19–33. doi: 10.1007/s00184-008-0176-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upadhyay SK, Gupta A. A Bayes analysis of modified Weibull distribution via Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation. J Stat Comput Simul. 2010;80:241–254. doi: 10.1080/00949650802600730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta RD, Kundu D. Generalized exponential distributions. Australian and New Zealand. J Stat. 1999;41:173–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta RD, Kundu D. Discriminating between Weibull and generalized exponential distributions. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2003;43:179–196. doi: 10.1016/S0167-9473(02)00206-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta RD, Kundu D. Discriminating between gamma and generalized exponential distributions. J Stat Comput Simul. 2004;74:107–121. doi: 10.1080/0094965031000114359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan N, Sandhu RA. A simple simulational algorithm for generating progressive type-II censored samples. Am Stat. 1995;49:229–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundu D, Kannan N, Balakrishnan N. Analysis of progressively censored competing risks data. In: Balakrishnan N, Rao CR. editors. Handbook of statistics, Vol. 23, New York: Elsevier; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Hall P. Theoretical comparison of bootstrap confidence intervals. Ann Stat. 1988;16:927–953. doi: 10.1214/aos/1176350933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron, B., 1982. The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and other Re-sampling Plans. CBMS/NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics 38. Philadelphia, PA: SIAM.
   Google Scholar