Estimation and prediction for a unified hybrid-censored Burr Type XII distribution

References

• Burr IW. Cumulative frequency functions. Ann Math Stat. 1942;13:215–232. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177731607
   Google Scholar
• Ali Mousa MAM, Jaheen ZF. Statistical inference for the Burr model based on progressively censored data. Comput Math Appl. 2002;43:1441–1449. doi: 10.1016/S0898-1221(02)00110-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao Q. Notes on maximum likelihood estimation for the three-parameter Burr XII distribution. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2004;45:675–687. doi: 10.1016/S0167-9473(02)00367-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed A, Soliman AH, Abd Ellah NA, Abou-Elheggag A, Modhesh A. Bayesian inference and prediction of Burr type XII distribution for progressive first failure censored sampling. Intell Inform Manage. 2011;3:175–185.
   Google Scholar
• Abbasi B, Hosseinifard SZ, Coit DW. A neural network applied to estimate Burr XII distribution parameters. Reliab Eng Syst Safety. 2010;95:647–654. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2010.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastogi MK, Tripathi YM. Estimating the parameters of a Burr distribution under progressive type II censoring. Stat Methodol. 2012;9:381–391. doi: 10.1016/j.stamet.2011.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu JW, Lee WC, Hong CW, Yeh SY. Implementing lifetime performance index of Burr XII products with progressively type ii right censored sample. Int J Innov Comput, Inform Control. 2014;10:671–693.
   Google Scholar
• Panahi H, Sayyareh A. On estimation of stress-strength model for Burr type XII distribution. Arch Des Sci J. 2012;65:81–95.
   Google Scholar
• Panahi H, Sayyareh A. Parameter estimation and prediction of order statistics for the Burr Type XII distribution with Type II censoring. J Appl Stat. 2014;41:215–232. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2013.838668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan N, Kundu D. Hybrid censoring: models, inferential results and applications. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2013;57:166–209. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2012.03.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandrasekar B, Childs A, Balakrishnan N. Exact likelihood inference for the exponential distribution under generalized Type-I and Type-II hybrid censoring. Naval Res Logist. 2004;51:994–1004. doi: 10.1002/nav.20038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan N, Rasouli A, Sanjari Farsipour N. Exact likelihood inference based on an unified hybrid censored sample from the exponential distribution. J Stat Comput Simul. 2008;78:475–488. doi: 10.1080/00949650601158336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habibi Rad A, Izanlo M. An EM algorithm for estimating the parameters of the generalized exponential distribution under unified hybrid censored data. J Stat Res Iran. 2011;8:149–162.
   Google Scholar
• Huang WT, Yang KC. A new hybrid censoring scheme and some of its properties. Tamsui Oxford J Math Sci. 2010;26:355–367.
   Google Scholar
• Zoraghi N, Abbasi B, Akhavan Niaki ST, Abdi M. Estimating the four parameters of the Burr III distribution using a hybrid method of variable neighborhood search and iterated local search algorithms. Appl Math Comput. 2012;218:9664–9675. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2012.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Respondek JS. Numerical recipes for the high efficient inverse of the confluent Vandermonde matrices. Appl Math Comput. 2011;218:2044–2054. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2011.07.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Respondek JS. Recursive numerical recipes for the high efficient inversion of the confluent Vandermonde matrices. Appl Math Comput. 2013;225:718–730. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2013.10.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin DB. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J R Stat Soc Series B. 1977;39:1–38.
   Google Scholar
• Pradhan B, Kundu D. Bayes estimation and prediction of the two-parameter gamma distribution. J Stat Comput Simul. 2011;81:1187–1198. doi: 10.1080/00949651003796335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basak I, Basak P, Balakrishnan N. On some predictors of times to failures of censored items in progressively censored sample. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2006;50:1313–1337. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2005.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundu D, Raqab MZ. Bayesian inference and prediction of order statistics for a Type-II censored Weibull distribution. J Stat Plann Infer. 2012;142:41–47. doi: 10.1016/j.jspi.2011.06.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asgharzadeh A, Valiollahi R, Kundu D. Prediction for future failures in Weibull distribution under hybrid censoring. J Stat Comput Simul. 2015;85:824–838. doi: 10.1080/00949655.2013.848451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundu D, Pradhan B. Estimating the parameters of the generalized exponential distribution in prescence of hybrid censoring. Commun Stat-A Theor Meth. 2009;38:2030–2041. doi: 10.1080/03610920802192505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindley DV. Approximate Bayesian method. Trabajos de Estadistica. 1980;31:223–245. doi: 10.1007/BF02888353
   Google Scholar
• Chen MH, Shao QM. Monte Carlo estimation of Bayesian credible and HPD intervals. J Comput Graph Stat. 1999;8:69–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raqab M, Nagaraja Z, Haikady N. On some predictors of future order statistics. Metron. 1995;53:185–204.
   Google Scholar
• Montavon G, Sampath S, Berndt CC, Herman H, Coddet C. Effects of the spray angle on splat morphology during thermal spraying. Surf Coat Tech. 1997;91:107–115. doi: 10.1016/S0257-8972(96)03137-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asadi S, Passandideh-Fard M, Moghiman M. Numerical and analytical model of the inclined impact of a droplet on a solid surface in a thermal spray coating process. Iran J Surface Eng. 2008;4:1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Asadi S. Simulation of nanodroplet impact on a solid surface. Int J Nano Dimens. 2012;3:19–26.
   Google Scholar
• Commenges D, Sayyareh A, Letenneur L, Guedj J, Bar-Hen A. Estimating a difference of Kullback–Leibler risks using a normalized difference of AIC. Ann App Stat. 2008;2:1123–1142. doi: 10.1214/08-AOAS176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayyareh A. Tracking interval for selecting between non-nested models: An investigation for Type II right censored data. J Stat Plan Infer. 2012;142:3201–3208. doi: 10.1016/j.jspi.2012.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuong QH, Wang W. Minimum chi-square estimation and tests for model selection. J Econometrics. 1993;56:141–168. doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(93)90104-D
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louis TA. Finding the observed information matrix when using the EM algorithm. J R Stat Soc Series B. 1982;44:226–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin CT, Balakrishnan N. Asymptotic properties of maximum likelihood estimators based on progressive Type-II censoring. Metrika. 2011;74:349–360. doi: 10.1007/s00184-010-0306-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar