Developing and designing of an efficient variables sampling system based on the process capability index

References

• Schilling EG. Acceptance sampling in quality control. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan AJ. Quality control and industrial statistics. 5th ed. Homewood (IL): Richard D. Irwin; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery DC. Introduction to statistical quality control. 6th ed. New York: Wiley; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Lieberman GJ, Resnikoff GJ. Sampling plans for inspection by variables. J Am Stat Assoc. 1955;50(270):457–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen DB. Variables sampling plans based on the normal distribution. Technometrics. 1967;9(3):417–423. doi: 10.1080/00401706.1967.10490485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamaker HC. Acceptance sampling for percent defective by variables and by attributes. J Qual Technol. 1979;11(3):139–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommers DJ. Two-point double variables sampling plans. J Qual Technol. 1981;13(1):25–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruhn-Suhr M, Krumbholz W. A new variables sampling plan for normally distributed lots with unknown standard deviation and double specification limits. Stat Pap. 1990;31(1):195–207. doi: 10.1007/BF02924690
   Google Scholar
• Baillie DH. Double sampling plans for inspection by variables when the process standard deviation is unknown. Int J Qual Reliab Manage. 1992;9(5):59–70. doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000001654
   Google Scholar
• Govindaraju K, Balamurali S. Chain sampling plan for variables inspection. J Appl Stat. 1998;25(1):103–109. doi: 10.1080/02664769823331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balamurali S, Jun CH. Repetitive group sampling procedure for variables inspection. J Appl Stat. 2006;33(3):327–338. doi: 10.1080/02664760500446010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jun C-H, Balamurali S, Lee S-H. Variables sampling plans for Weibull distributed lifetimes under sudden death testing. IEEE Trans Reliab. 2006;55(1):53–58. doi: 10.1109/TR.2005.863802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearn WL, Wu CW. Critical acceptance values and sample sizes of a variables sampling plan for very low fraction of defectives. Omega. 2006;34(1):90–101. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2004.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearn WL, Wu CW. An effective decision making method for product acceptance. Omega. 2007;35(1):12–21. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2005.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balamurali S, Jun C-H. Multiple dependent state sampling plans for lot acceptance based on the measurement data. Eur J Oper Res. 2007;180(3):1221–1230. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.05.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane VE. Process capability indices. J Qual Technol. 1986;18(1):41–52, Corrigenda pp. 265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan LK, Cheng SW, Spring FA. A new measure of process capability: Cpm. J Qual Technol. 1988;30(3):162–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotz S, Johnson NL. Process capability indices – a review, 1992–2000. J Qual Technol. 2002;34(1):2–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiring F, Leung B, Cheng S, et al. A bibliography of process capability papers. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2003;19(5):445–460. doi: 10.1002/qre.538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yum BJ, Kim KW. A bibliography of the literature on process capability indices: 2000–2009. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2011;27(3):251–268. doi: 10.1002/qre.1115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiang TC, Taguchi G. A tutorial on quality control and assurance – the Taguchi methods. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Statistical Association; 1985; Las Vegas, NV.
   Google Scholar
• Pearn WL, Kotz S, Johnson NL. Distributional and inferential properties of process capability indices. J Qual Technol. 1992;24(4):216–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearn WL, Lin PC. Computer program for calculating the p-values in testing process capability index Cpmk. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2002;18(4):333–342. doi: 10.1002/qre.465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balamurali S. Bootstrap confidence limits for the process capability index Cpmk. Int J Qual Eng Technol. 2012;3(1):79–90. doi: 10.1504/IJQET.2012.046156
   Google Scholar
• Itay N, Yisrael P, Edna S. Developing a sampling plan based on Cpk. Qual Eng. 2009;21(3):306–318. doi: 10.1080/08982110902873597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu CW, Pearn WL. A variables sampling plan based on Cpmk for product acceptance determination. Eur J Oper Res. 2008;184(2):549–560. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.11.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam M, Wu C-W, Azam M, et al. Variables sampling inspection for resubmitted lots based on process capability index Cpk for normally distributed items. Appl Math Model. 2013;37(3):667–675. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2012.02.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam M, Azam M, Jun C-H. Multiple dependent state sampling plan based on process capability index. J Test Eval. 2013;41(2):340–346. doi: 10.1520/JTE20120012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam M, Wu C-W, Jun C-H, et al. Developing a variables repetitive group sampling plan based on process capability index Cpk with unknown mean and variance. J Stat Comput Sim. 2013;83(8):1507–1517. doi: 10.1080/00949655.2012.663374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam M, Wu C-W, Azam M, et al. Mixed acceptance sampling plans for product inspection using process capability index. Qual Eng. 2014;26(4):450–459. doi: 10.1080/08982112.2014.903970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu CW, Wu TH, Chen T. Developing a variables repetitive group sampling scheme by considering process yield and quality loss. Int J Prod Res. 2015;53(7):2239–2251. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2014.986300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodge HF. A dual system of acceptance sampling. New Brunswick (NJ): The Statistics Center, Rutgers – The State University; 1967 (Technical Report No.16).
   Google Scholar
• Romboski LD. An investigation of quick switching acceptance sampling systems [PhD dissertation]. New Brunswick (NJ): Rutgers – The State University; 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Balamurali S, Usha M. Optimal designing of variables quick switching variables sampling system by minimizing average sample number. J Appl Stat Sci. 2012;19(3):51–66.
   Google Scholar
• Balamurali S, Usha M. Variables quick switching system with double specification limits. Int J Reliab Qual Safety Eng. 2012;19(2):1250008-1–1250008-17. doi: 10.1142/S0218539312500088
   Google Scholar
• Balamurali S, Usha M. A new failure censored sampling system for Weibull distribution. Int J Performability Eng. 2013;9(1):3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Balamurali S, Usha M. Optimal designing of variables quick switching system based on the process capability index Cpk. J Ind Prod Eng. 2014;31(2):85–94.
   Google Scholar
• Wu CW. An efficient inspection scheme for variables based on Taguchi capability index. Eur J Oper Res. 2012;223(1):116–122. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.06.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar