EM-Type algorithms for heavy-tailed logistic mixed models

References

• Breslow NE, Clayton DG. Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models. J Am Stat Assoc. 1993;88(421):9–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCulloch C, Searle SR. Generalized, linear, and mixed models. New York: Wiley; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson KP, Lipsitz SR, Fitzmaurice GM, et al. Use of the probability integral transformation to fit nonlinear mixed-effects models with nonnormal random effects. J Comput Graph Stat. 2006;15(1):39–57. doi: 10.1198/106186006X96854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu L, Yu Z. A likelihood reformulation method in non-normal random effects models. Stat Med. 2008;27(16):3105–3124. doi: 10.1002/sim.3153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Dey DK. Skew random effects in multilevel binomial models: an alternative to nonparametric approach. Stat Model. 2008;8(3):221–241. doi: 10.1177/1471082X0800800301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza ADP, Migon HS. Bayesian outlier analysis in binary regression. J Appl Stat. 2010;37(8):1355–1368. doi: 10.1080/02664760903031153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos CC, Loschi RH, Arellano-Valle RB. Parameters interpretation in skewed logistic regression with random intercept. Bayesian Anal. 2013;8(2):381–410. doi: 10.1214/13-BA813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin DB. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J R Stat Soc B. 1977;39(1):1–38.
   Google Scholar
• Prates MO, Costa DR, Lachos VH. Generalized linear mixed models for correlated binary data with t-link. Stat Comput. 2014;24(6):1111–1123. doi: 10.1007/s11222-013-9423-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celeux G, Diebolt J. The SEM algorithm: a probabilistic teacher algorithm derived from EM algorithm for the mixture problem. Comput Stat Quart. 1985;2:73–82.
   Google Scholar
• Wei GCG, Tanner MA. A Monte Carlo implementation of the EM algorithm and the poor man's data augmentation algorithms. J Am Stat Assoc. 1990;85(411):699–704. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1990.10474930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delyon B, Lavielle M, Moulines E. Convergence of a stochastic approximation version of the em algorithm. Ann Stat. 1999;27(1):94–128. doi: 10.1214/aos/1018031103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang X, Wolfe RA. A frailty model for informative censoring. Biometrics. 2002;58(3):510–520. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2002.00510.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J, Zhang D, Davidian M. A Monte Carlo EM algorithm for generalized linear mixed models with flexible random effects distributions. Biostatistics. 2002;3(3):347–360. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/3.3.347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn E, Lavielle M. Maximum likelihood estimation in nonlinear mixed effects models. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2005;49(4):1020–1038. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2004.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jank W. Stochastic variants of EM: Monte Carlo, quasi-Monte Carlo and more. Proceedings of the American statistical Association; August; Mineapolis, MN: 2005. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Neath R. Monte carlo methods for likelihood-based inference in hierarchical models. ProQuest; 2006. Available from: http://books.google.com.br/books?id=WcCbASkRvF8C.
   Google Scholar
• McCulloch CE. Maximum likelihood algorithms for generalized linear mixed models. J Am Stat Assoc. 1997;92(437):162–170. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1997.10473613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quintana FA, Liu JS, Pino GED. Monte Carlo EM with importance reweighting and its applications in random effects models. Comput Stat Data Anal. 1999;29(4):429–444. doi: 10.1016/S0167-9473(98)00075-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth JG, Hobert JP. Maximizing generalized linear mixed model likelihoods with an automated Monte Carlo EM algorithm. J R Stat Soc B. 1999;61(1):265–285. doi: 10.1111/1467-9868.00176
   Google Scholar
• Levine RA, Casella G. Implementations of the Monte Carlo EM algorithm. J Comput Graph Stat. 2001;10(3):422–439. doi: 10.1198/106186001317115045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caffo BS, Jank W, Jones GL. Ascent-based monte carlo expectation–maximization. J R Stat Soc B. 2005;67(2):235–251. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00499.x
   Google Scholar
• Levine RA, Fan J. An automated (Markov chain) Monte Carlo EM algorithm. J Stat Comput Simul. 2004;74(5):349–360. doi: 10.1080/0094965031000147704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos CC, Loschi RH. Maximum likelihood estimation and parameters interpretation in elliptical mixed logistic regression models. Test. 2017;26(1):209–230. doi: 10.1007/s11749-016-0507-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers WH, Tukey JW. Understanding some long-tailed symmetrical distributions. Stat Neerl. 1972;26(3):211–226. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9574.1972.tb00191.x
   Google Scholar
• Andrews DF, Mallows CL. Scale mixtures of normal distributions. J R Stat Soc B. 1974;36(1):99–102.
   Google Scholar
• Lange K, Sinsheimer JS. Normal/independent distributions and their applications in robust regression. J Comput Graph Stat. 1993;2(2):175–198.
   Google Scholar
• Chan JSK, Kuk AYC. Maximum likelihood estimation for probit-linear mixed models with correlated random effects. Biometrics. 1997;53(1):86–97. doi: 10.2307/2533099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philippe A. Simulation of right and left truncated gamma distributions by mixtures. Stat Comput. 1997;7(3):173–181. doi: 10.1023/A:1018534102043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilks WR, Richardson S, Spiegelhalter DJ. Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice: interdisciplinary statistics. Boca Raton (FL): Chapman & Hall; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Gamerman D, Lopes HF. Markov chain Monte Carlo: Stochastic simulation for Bayesian inference. 2nd ed. Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Haario H, Saksman E, Tamminen J. Componentwise adaptation for high dimensional MCMC. Comput Stat. 2005;20(2):265–273. doi: 10.1007/BF02789703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haario H, Saksman E, Tamminen J. An adaptive metropolis algorithm. Bernoulli (Andover). 2001;7(2):223–242. doi: 10.2307/3318737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman AG, Roberts GO, Gilks WR. Efficient Metropolis jumping rules. In: Bernardo JM, Berger JO, Dawid AP, Smith AFM, editors. Bayesian statistics V, Vol. 5. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996. p. 599–608.
   Google Scholar
• Doornik JA. Ox 5 – an object-oriented matrix programming language. London: Timberlake Consultands Ltd.; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 2015. Available from: http://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen K, Petersen JH, Budtz-Jørgensen E, et al. Interpreting parameters in the logistic regression model with random effects. Biometrics. 2000;56:909–914. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00909.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar