An alternative method for evaluating stationarity in transition models

References

• Molenbergs G, Verbeke G. Models for discrete longitudinal data. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Ware JH, Lipsitz S, Speizer FE. Issues in the analysis of repeated categorical outcomes. Stat Med. 1988;7:95–107. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780070113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Rooij M. Transitional modelling of experimental longitudinal data with missing values. Advances in Data Analysis and Classification. Available from link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsey JK. Statistical analysis of stochastic processes in time. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson TW, Goodman LA. Statistical Inference about Markov Chains. Ann Math Stat. 1957;28:89–110. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177707039
   Google Scholar
• Cox DR. The analysis of binary data. Methuen: London; 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Korn EL, Whittemore AS. Methods for analysing panel studies of acute health effects of air pollution. Biometrics. 1979;35:715–802. doi: 10.2307/2530111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azzalini A. Maximum likelihood estimation of order m for stationary stochastic processes. Biometrika. 1983;70:381–388. doi: 10.1093/biomet/70.2.381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeger SL, Liang KY, Self SG. The analysis of binary longitudinal data with time-independent covariates. Biometrika. 1985;72:31–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonney GE. Logistic Regression for dependent binary observations. Biometrics. 1987;43:951–973. doi: 10.2307/2531548
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzmaurice GM, Laird NM. A likelihood-based method for analysing longitudinal binary responses. Biometrika. 1993;80:141–151. doi: 10.1093/biomet/80.1.141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diggle PJ, Heagerty PJ, Liang KY, et al. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Lee K, Daniels MJ. A class of Markov Models for longitudinal data. Biometrics. 2007;63:1060–1067. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00800.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heagerty PJ. Marginalized transition models and likelihood inference for categorical data. Biometrics. 2002;58:342–351. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2002.00342.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Rooij M. Transitional ideal point models for longitudinal multinomial outcomes. Statist Model. 2011;11(2):15–135. doi: 10.1177/1471082X1001100202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agresti A. Analysis of ordinal categorical data. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Koch GC, Carr GJ, Amara IA, et al. Categorical data analysis. In: Berry, D.A. Statistical methodology in the pharmaceutical sciences. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1990. Chapter 13, p. 389–473.
   Google Scholar
• Castro AC. Comportamento e desempenho sexual de suínos reprodutores em ambientes enriquecidos [unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Piracicaba (Brazil): University of São Paulo, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Zeger SL, Liang KY. An overview of methods for the analysis of longitudinal data. Stat Med. 1992;11:1825–1839. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780111406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelder JA, Wedderburn RWM. Generalized linear models. J R Statist Soc Ser A. 1972;135:370–384. doi: 10.2307/2344614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agresti A. Categorical data analysis. 3rd ed. Wiley: New York; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• McCullagh P. Regression methods for ordinal data. J R Statist Soc. Ser B. 1980;42:109–142.
   Google Scholar
• Wald A. Tests of statistical hypotheses concerning several parameters when the number of observations is large. Trans Amer Math Soc. 1943;54:426–482. doi: 10.1090/S0002-9947-1943-0012401-3
   Google Scholar
• Rayner JCW, Best DJ. Smooth tests of goodness fit. New York: Oxford University Press; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner JCW. The asymptotically optimal tests. J R Statist Soc (Statist). 1997;46:337–346. doi: 10.1111/1467-9884.00087
   Google Scholar
• Buse A. The likelihood-ratio, Wald and Lagrange multiplier tests: an expository note. Amer Stat. 1982;36:153–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao TF. Comparing social groups: Wald statistics for testing equality among multiple logit models. Int J Comparative Sociol. 2004;45(12):3–16. doi: 10.1177/0020715204048308
   Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. A language and environment for statistical computing, 3.2. Vienna, Austria, 2015. Available from http://www.R-project.org.
   Google Scholar
• Yee TW. The VGAM package for categorical data analysis. J Statist Softw. 2010;32:1–34. doi: 10.18637/jss.v032.i10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen RHB. Analysis of ordinal data with cumulative link models estimation with the R-package ordinal. 2011. Available from: http://www.R-project.org.
   Google Scholar
• Spedicato GA. markovchain: discrete time Markov chains made easy, 2015. Available from: http://www.R-project.org.
   Google Scholar