Optimal CUSUM and adaptive CUSUM charts with auxiliary information for process mean

References

• Montgomery DC. Introduction to statistical quality control. 6th ed. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Page ES. Continuous inspection schemes. Biometrika. 1954;41(1/2):100–115. doi: 10.2307/2333009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts SW. Control chart tests based on geometric moving averages. Technometrics. 1959;1(3):239–250. doi: 10.1080/00401706.1959.10489860
   Google Scholar
• Lucas JM. Combined Shewhart-CUSUM quality control schemes. J Qual Technol. 1982;14(2):51–59. doi: 10.1080/00224065.1982.11978790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodall WH, Ncube MM. Multivariate CUSUM quality-control procedures. Technometrics. 1985;27(3):285–292. doi: 10.1080/00401706.1985.10488053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosier RB. Multivariate generalizations of cumulative sum quality-control schemes. Technometrics. 1988;30(3):291–303. doi: 10.1080/00401706.1988.10488402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haq A. A new hybrid exponentially weighted moving average control chart for monitoring process mean. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2013;29(7):1015–1025. doi: 10.1002/qre.1453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haq A, Brown J, Moltchanova E. Improved fast initial response features for exponentially weighted moving average and cumulative sum control charts. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2014;30(5):697–710. doi: 10.1002/qre.1521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haq A, Brown J, Moltchanova E. A new cumulative sum quality control scheme for monitoring the process mean. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2014;30(8):1165–1177. doi: 10.1002/qre.1539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haq A, Brown J, Moltchanova E. New synthetic EWMA and synthetic CUSUM control charts for monitoring the process mean. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2016;32(1):269–290. doi: 10.1002/qre.1747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds Jr MR, Stoumbos ZG. Should observations be grouped for effective process monitoring? J Qual Technol. 2004;36(4):343–366. doi: 10.1080/00224065.2004.11980283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparks RS. CUSUM charts for signalling varying location shifts. J Qual Technol. 2000;32(2):157–171. doi: 10.1080/00224065.2000.11979987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shu L, Jiang W. A Markov chain model for the adaptive CUSUM control chart. J Qual Technol. 2006;38(2):135–147. doi: 10.1080/00224065.2006.11918601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shu L, Jiang W, Wu Z. Adaptive CUSUM procedures with Markovian mean estimation. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2008;52(9):4395–4409. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2008.02.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang W, Shu L, Apley DW. Adaptive CUSUM procedures with EWMA-based shift estimators. IIE Trans. 2008;40(10):992–1003. doi: 10.1080/07408170801961412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Z, Jiao J, Yang M, et al. An enhanced adaptive CUSUM control chart. IIE Trans. 2009;41(7):642–653. doi: 10.1080/07408170802712582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo Y, Li Z, Wang Z. Adaptive CUSUM control chart with variable sampling intervals. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2009;53(7):2693–2701. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2009.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Zhang J, Wang Z. Self-starting control chart for simultaneously monitoring process mean and variance. Int J Prod Res. 2010;48(15):4537–4553. doi: 10.1080/00207540903051692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Luo Y, Wang Z. Cusum of Q chart with variable sampling intervals for monitoring the process mean. Int J Prod Res. 2010;48(16):4861–4876. doi: 10.1080/00207540903074983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Wang Z. Adaptive CUSUM of the Q chart. Int J Prod Res. 2010;48(5):1287–1301. doi: 10.1080/00207540802484937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai Y, Luo Y, Li Z, Wang Z. A new adaptive CUSUM control chart for detecting the multivariate process mean. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2011;27(7):877–884. doi: 10.1002/qre.1177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins DM. Multivariate quality control based on regression-adjusted variables. Technometrics. 1991;33(1):61–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins DM. Regression adjustment for variables in multivariate quality control. J Qual Technol. 1993;25(3):170–182. doi: 10.1080/00224065.1993.11979451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade MR, Woodall WH. A review and analysis of cause-selecting control charts. J Qual Technol. 1993;25(3):161–169. doi: 10.1080/00224065.1993.11979450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbasi SA, Riaz M. On enhanced control charting for process monitoring. Int J Phys Sci. 2013;8(17):759–775. doi: 10.5897/IJPS12.252
   Google Scholar
• Riaz M. Monitoring process mean level using auxiliary information. Statist Neerlandica. 2008;62(4):458–481. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9574.2008.00390.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riaz M. Monitoring process variability using auxiliary information. Comput Stat. 2008;23(2):253–276. doi: 10.1007/s00180-007-0084-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haq A, Khoo MBC. A new synthetic control chart for monitoring process mean using auxiliary information. J Stat Comput Simul. 2016;86(15):3068–3092. doi: 10.1080/00949655.2016.1150477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haq A. New synthetic CUSUM and synthetic EWMA control charts for monitoring the process mean using auxiliary information. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2017;33(7):1549–1565. doi: 10.1002/qre.2124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbas N, Riaz M, Does RJMM. An EWMA-type control chart for monitoring the process mean using auxiliary information. Commun Stat Theory Methods. 2014;43(16):3485–3498. doi: 10.1080/03610926.2012.700368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad S, Abbasi SA, Riaz M, et al. On efficient use of auxiliary information for control charting in SPC. Comput Ind Eng. 2014;67:173–184. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2013.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haq A. New EWMA control charts for monitoring process dispersion using auxiliary information. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2017;33(8):2597–2614. doi: 10.1002/qre.2220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haq A. A new maximum EWMA control chart for simultaneously monitoring process mean and dispersion using auxiliary information. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2017;33(7):1577–1587. doi: 10.1002/qre.2126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanusi RA, Abbas N, Riaz M. On efficient CUSUM-type location control charts using auxiliary information. Qual Technol Quant Manag. 2017;15(1):87–105. doi: 10.1080/16843703.2017.1304039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adegoke NA, Riaz M, Sanusi RA, et al. EWMA-type scheme for monitoring location parameter using auxiliary information. Comput Ind Eng. 2017;114(12):114–129. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2017.10.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanusi RA, Abujiya MR, Riaz M, et al. Combined Shewhart-CUSUM charts using auxiliary variable. Comput Ind Eng. 2017;105:329–337. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2017.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha S, Khoo MBC, Lee MH, et al. A variable sample size and sampling interval control chart for monitoring the process mean using auxiliary information. Qual Technol Quant Manag. 2018; early access.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haq A, Khoo MBC. A new double sampling control chart for monitoring process mean using auxiliary information. J Stat Comput Simul. 2018;88(5):869–899. doi: 10.1080/00949655.2017.1408111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yashchin E. Estimating the current mean of a process subject to abrupt changes. Technometrics. 1995;37(3):311–323. doi: 10.1080/00401706.1995.10484337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbas N. Memory-type control charts in statistical process control [PhD thesis]. Amsterdam School of Economics Research Institute (ASE-RI), Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB); 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Wu Z. Monitoring the process mean and variance using a weighted loss function CUSUM scheme with variable sampling intervals. IIE Trans. 2006;38(4):377–387. doi: 10.1080/07408170500232578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ou Y, Wu Z, Goh TN. A new SPRT chart for monitoring process mean and variance. Int J Prod Econ. 2011;132(2):303–314. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ou Y, Wu Z, Tsung F. A comparison study of effectiveness and robustness of control charts for monitoring process mean. Int J Prod Econ. 2012;135(1):479–490. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.08.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Tsung F, Wang Z. Dual CUSUM control schemes for detecting a range of mean shifts. IIE Trans. 2005;37(11):1047–1057. doi: 10.1080/07408170500232321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryu J-H, Wan H, Kim S. Optimal design of a cusum chart for a mean shift of unknown size. J Qual Technol. 2010;42(3):311–326. doi: 10.1080/00224065.2010.11917826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Zou C, Gong Z, et al. The computation of average run length and average time to signal: an overview. J Stat Comput Simul. 2014;84(8):1779–1802. doi: 10.1080/00949655.2013.766737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs C, Kenett RS. Multivariate quality control: theory and applications. New York: CRC Press; 1998.
   Google Scholar