A comparison of the type I error rates of three assessment methods for indirect effects

References

• Wright S. The method of path coefficients. Ann Math Stat. 1934;5:161–215. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177732676
   Google Scholar
• Fritz MS, Kenny DA, Mackinnon DP. The combined effects of measurement error and omitting confounders in the single-mediator model. Multivariate Behav Res. 2016;51:281–697. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2016.1224154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang J, Uuan Y. Bayesian dynamic mediation analysis. Psychol Methods. 2017;22:667–686. doi: 10.1037/met0000073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelcey B, Dong N, Spybrook J, et al. Experimental power for indirect effects in group-randomized studies with group-level mediators. Multivariate Behav Res. 2017;52:699–719. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2017.1356212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachowicz MJ, Preacher KJ, Kelley K. A novel measure of effect size for mediation analysis. Psychol Methods. 2018;23:244–261. doi: 10.1037/met0000165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montoya AK, Hayes AF. Two-condition within-participant statistical mediation analysis: a path-analytic framework. Psychol Methods. 2017;22:6–27. doi: 10.1037/met0000086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackinnon DP, Fairchild AJ, Fritz MS. Mediation analysis. Annu Rev Psychol. 2007;58:593–614. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085542
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rucker DD, Preacher KJ, Tormala ZL, et al. Mediation analysis in social psychology: current practices and new recommendations. Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2011;5:359–371. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00355.x
   Google Scholar
• Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51:1173–1182. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobel ME. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In: S Leinhardt, editor. Social methodology. Washington (DC): American Sociological Association; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes AF. Introduction to mediation, moderation and conditional process analysis. New York (NY): Guildford; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Rucker DD, Hayes AF. Assessing moderated mediation hypotheses: theory, methods and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Reseach. 2007;42:185–227. doi: 10.1080/00273170701341316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams J, Mackinnon DP. Resampling and distribution of the product methods for testing indirect effects in complex models. Struct Equ Modeling. 2008;15:23–51. doi: 10.1080/10705510701758166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron B, Tibshriani R. An introduction to the bootstrap. New York (NY): Chapman & Hall; 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Mackinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Hoffman JM, et al. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychol Methods. 2002;7:83–104. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; 2017. Available at http://www.Rproject.org/
   Google Scholar
• Achim A. Testing the number of required dimensions in exploratory factor analysis. Quant Methods Psychol. 2017;13:64–74. doi: 10.20982/tqmp.13.1.p064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caron P-O. A Monte Carlo examination of the broken-stick distribution to identify components to retain in principal component analysis. J Stat Comput Simul. 2016;86:2405–2410. doi: 10.1080/00949655.2015.1112390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackinnon DP, Warsi G, Dwyer JH. A simulation study of mediated effect measures. Multivariate Behav Res. 1995;30:41–62. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3001_3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peres-Neto PR, Jackson DA, Somers KM. How many principal components? stopping rules for determining the number of non-trivial axes revisited. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2005;49:974–997. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2004.06.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell DC. Statistical methods for psychology. Belmont: Wadsworth; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Caron P-O, Valois P. A computational description of simple mediation analysis. Quant Methods Psychol. 2018;14:147–158. doi: 10.20982/tqmp.14.2.p147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar