Heteroscedastic and heavy-tailed regression with mixtures of skew Laplace normal distributions

References

• Park RE. Estimation with heteroscedastic error terms. Econometrica. 1966;34(4):888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey AC. Estimating regression models with multiplicative heteroscedasticity. Econometrica. 1976;44(3):461–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aitkin M. Modelling variance heterogeneity in normal regression using GLIM. Appl Stat. 1987;36:332–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbyla AP. Modelling variance heterogeneity: residual maximum likelihood and diagnostics. J R Stat Soc Series B Methodol. 1993;55(2):493–508.
   Google Scholar
• Engel J, Huele AF. A generalized linear modeling approach to robust design. Technometrics. 1996;38(4):365–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor J, Verbyla A. Joint modelling of location and scale parameters of the t distribution. Stat Modelling. 2004;4(2):91–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin TI, Wang YJ. A robust approach to joint modeling of mean and scale covariance for longitudinal data. J Stat Plan Inference. 2009;139(9):3013–3026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin TI, Wang WL. Bayesian inference in joint modelling of location and scale parameters of the t distribution for longitudinal data. J Stat Plan Inference. 2011;141(4):1543–1553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu L, Li H. Variable selection for joint mean and dispersion models of the inverse Gaussian distribution. Metrika. 2012;75(6):795–808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu LC, Zhang ZZ, Xu DK. Variable selection in joint mean and variance models of Box-Cox transformation. J Appl Stat. 2012;39(12):2543–2555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu LC, Zhang ZZ, Xu DK. Variable selection in joint location and scale models of the skew-normal distribution. J Stat Comput Simul. 2013;83(7):1266–1278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azzalini A. A class of distributions which includes the normal ones. Scand J Stat. 1985;12(2):171–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azzalini A. Further results on a class of distributions which includes the normal ones. Statistica. 1986;46(2):199–208.
   Google Scholar
• Li HQ, Wu LC. Joint modelling of location and scale parameters of the skew-normal distribution. Appl Math. 2014;29(3):265–272.
   Google Scholar
• Wu LC. Variable selection in joint location and scale models of the skew-t-normal distribution. Commun Stat Simul Comput. 2014;43(3):615–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao W, Zhang R. Variable selection of varying dispersion student-t regression models. J Syst Sci Complex. 2015;28(4):961–977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Wu L, Ma T. Variable selection in joint location, scale and skewness models of the skew-normal distribution. J Syst Sci Complex. 2017;30(3):694–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu L, Tian GL, Zhang YQ, et al. Variable selection in joint location, scale and skewness models with a skew-t-normal distribution. Stat Interface. 2017;10(2):217–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doğru FZ, Arslan O. Joint modelling of the location, scale and skewness parameters of the skew Laplace normal distribution. Iranian J Sci Technol Trans A Sci. 2019;43(3):1249–1257.
   Google Scholar
• Quandt RE. A new approach to estimating switching regressions. J Am Stat Assoc. 1972;67(338):306–310.
   Google Scholar
• Quandt RE, Ramsey JB. Estimating mixtures of normal distributions and switching regressions. J Am Stat Assoc. 1978;73(364):730–738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei Y. (2012), “Robust mixture regression models using t-distribution”, Master Report, Kansas State University.
   Google Scholar
• Yao W, Wei Y, Yu C. Robust mixture regression using the t-distribution. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2014;71:116–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J. Robust mixture regression modeling with Pearson Type VII distribution [Master Report]. Kansas State University; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Song W, Yao W, Xing Y. Robust mixture regression model fitting by Laplace distribution. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2014;71:128–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu M, Lin TI. A skew-normal mixture regression model. Educ Psychol Meas. 2014;74(1):139–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doğru FZ. Robust parameter estimation in mixture regression models [Ph.D. thesis] Ankara University; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Doğru FZ, Arslan O. Robust mixture regression based on the skew t distribution. Revista Colombiana de Estadística. 2017;40(1):45–64.
   Google Scholar
• Azzalini A, Capitanio A. Distributions generated by perturbation of symmetry with emphasis on a multivariate skew `-distribution. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 2003;65(2):367–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doğru FZ, Arslan O. Robust mixture regression using the mixture of different distributions. In: Agostinelli C, et al., editor. Recent advances in robust statistics: theory and applications. New Delhi: Springer India; 2016. p. 57–79.
   Google Scholar
• Doğru FZ, Arslan O. Parameter estimation for mixtures of skew Laplace normal distributions and application in mixture regression modeling. Commun Stat Theory Methods. 2017;46(21):10879–10896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai L, Yin JH, Xie ZF, et al. Robust variable selection in finite mixture of regression models using the t distribution. Commun Stat Theory Methods. 2019. DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2018.1513143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez HW, Venegas O, Bolfarine H. Skew-symmetric distributions generated by the distribution function of the normal distribution. Environmetrics. 2007;18:395–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li HQ, Wu LC, Yi JY. A skew–normal mixture of joint location, scale and skewness models. Appl Math. 2016;31(3):283–295.
   Google Scholar
• Dunson DB, Pillai N, Park JH. Bayesian density regression. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 2007;69(2):163–183.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández C, Steel MF. On Bayesian modeling of fat tails and skewness. J Am Stat Assoc. 1998;93(441):359–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henze N. A probabilistic representation of the skew-normal distribution. Scand J Stat. 1986;13(4):271–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennig C. Identifiability of models for clusterwise linear regression. J Classif. 2000;17(2):273–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang P, Puterman ML, Cockburn I, et al. Mixed Poisson regression models with covariate dependent rates. Biometrics. 1996;52:381–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basford KE, Greenway DR, McLachlan GJ, et al. Standard errors of fitted means under normal mixture. Comput Stat. 1997;12:1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azzalini A, Capitanio A. Statistical applications of the multivariate skew normal distribution. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 1999;61(3):579–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabral CRB, Bolfarine H, Pereira JRG. Bayesian density estimation using skew student-t-normal mixtures. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2008;52:5075–5090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Escudero LA, Gordaliza A, Mayo-Iscar A, et al. Robust clusterwise linear regression through trimming. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2010;54:3057–3069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doğru FZ, Arslan O. Robust mixture regression modeling using the least trimmed squares (LTS)-estimation method. Commun Stat Simul Comput. 2018;47(7):2184–2196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akaike H. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov BN, Caski F, editors. Proceeding of the second international symposium on information theory. Budapest: Akademiai Kiado; 1973. p. 267–281.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz G. Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat. 1978;6(2):461–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai ZD, Krishnaiah PR, Zhao LC. On rates of convergence of efficient detection criteria in signal processing with white noise. IEEE Trans Inf Theory. 1989;35:380–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin DB. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J R Stat Soc Series B. 1977;39:1–38.
   Google Scholar
• Kiefer NM. Discrete parameter variation: efficient estimation of a switching regression model. Econometrica. 1978;46:427–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters Jr BC, Walker HF. An iterative procedure for obtaining maximum-likelihood estimates of the parameters for a mixture of normal distributions. SIAM J Appl Math. 1978;35(2):362–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redner RA, Walker HF. Mixture densities, maximum likelihood and the EM algorithm. SIAM Rev. 1984;26(2):195–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLachlan GJ, Peel D. Finite mixture models. New York: Wiley; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng RCH, Liu WB. The consistency of estimators in finite mixture models. Scand J Stat. 2001;28(4):603–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan X, Chen J, Zhang R. Consistency of the constrained maximum likelihood estimator in finite normal mixture models. In Proceedings of the American statistical Association. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association; 2007. p. 2113–2119.
   Google Scholar
• Wald A. Note on the consistency of the maximum likelihood estimate. Ann Math Stat. 1949;20(4):595–601.
   Google Scholar