Optimal progressive interval censoring plan under accelerated life test with limited budget

References

• Nelson WB. Accelerated testing: statistical models, test plans, and data analysis. New York (NY): Wiley; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson W, Meeker WQ. Theory for optimum accelerated life tests for Weibull and extreme value distributions. Technometrics. 1978;20:171–177. doi: 10.1080/00401706.1978.10489643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng HKT, Balakrishnan N, Chan PS. Optimal sample size allocation for tests with multiple levels of stress with extreme value regression. Nav Res Logist. 2007;54:237–249. doi: 10.1002/nav.20207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins AJ, John AM. On constant stress accelerated life tests terminated by type II censoring at one of the stress levels. J Stat Plan Inference. 2008;138:768–786. doi: 10.1016/j.jspi.2007.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ka CY, Chan PS, Ng HKT, et al. Optimal sample size allocation for multi-level stress testing with Weibull regression under type-II censoring. Statistics. 2011;45:257–279. doi: 10.1080/02331880903546290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan T-H, Yu C-H. Statistical inference on constant stress accelerated life tests under generalized gamma lifetime distributions. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2013;29:631–638. doi: 10.1002/qre.1412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escobar LA, Meeker MQ. Planning accelerated life tests with two or more experimental factors. Technometrics. 1995;37:411–427. doi: 10.1080/00401706.1995.10484374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Y, Elasyed EA. Design of accelerated life testing plans under multiple stresses. Nav Res Logist. 2013;60:468–478. doi: 10.1002/nav.21545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinger DJ. On the notion of activation energy in reliability: Arrhenius, Eyring and Thermodynamics. Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium; 1991. p. 295–300.
   Google Scholar
• Lam CF, Guo H, Larson L. Time-varying multi-stress ALT for modeling life of outdoor optical products. Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium; 2007. p. 265–270.
   Google Scholar
• Ghazikhanian V. Test of the STAR time-of-flight START detector, MOSFET PMT base UCLA. Los Angeles: Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Li C, Fard N. Optimum bivariate step-stress accelerated life test for censored data. IEEE Trans Reliab. 2007;56:77–84. doi: 10.1109/TR.2006.890897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu H, Fei H. Planning step-stress accelerated life tests with two experimental variables. IEEE Trans Reliab. 2007;56:569–579. doi: 10.1109/TR.2007.903292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monroe E, Pan R, Anderson-Cook C, et al. A generalized linear model approach to designing accelerated life test experiments. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2011;27:595–607. doi: 10.1002/qre.1143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay M, Beckman R, Conover W. A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics. 1979;21:239–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye KQ. Orthogonal column Latin hypercubes and their application in computer experiments. J Am Stat Assoc. 1998;93:1430–1439. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1998.10473803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao M, Cui W-C. Application of the optimal Latin hypercube design and radial basis function network to collaborative optimization. J Mar Sci Appl. 2007;6:24–32. doi: 10.1007/s11804-007-7012-6
   Google Scholar
• Cohen AC. Progressively censored samples in life testing. Technometrics. 1963;5:327–339. doi: 10.1080/00401706.1963.10490102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan N, Aggarwala R. Progressive censoring: theory, methods, and applications. Boston (MA): Birkhauser; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan N, Cramer E. The art of progressive censoring: applications to reliability and quality. Boston (MA): Birkhauser; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan N. Progressive censoring methodology: an appraisal (with discussions). Test. 2007;16:211–296. doi: 10.1007/s11749-007-0061-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aggarwala R. Progressive interval censoring: some mathematical results with applications to inference. Commun Stat Theory Methods. 2001;30:1921–1935. doi: 10.1081/STA-100105705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiang L, Tse S-K. Maximum likelihood estimation in survival studies under progressive interval censoring with random removals. J Biopharm Stat. 2005;15:981–991. doi: 10.1080/10543400500266643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang C, Tse S-K. Planning accelerated life tests under progressive type I interval censoring with random removals. Commun Stat – Simul Comput. 2005;34:1001–1025. doi: 10.1080/03610910500308552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang S-R, Wu S-J. Reliability sampling plans under progressive type-I interval censoring using cost functions. IEEE Trans Reliab. 2008;57:445–451. doi: 10.1109/TR.2008.928239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai T-R, Lin C-W. Acceptance sampling plans under progressive interval censoring with likelihood ratio. Stat Pap. 2010;51:259–271. doi: 10.1007/s00362-008-0141-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu S-J, Huang S-R. Planning progressive type-I interval censoring life tests with competing risks. IEEE Trans Reliab. 2014;63:511–522. doi: 10.1109/TR.2014.2313708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lui KJ, Steffey D, Pugh JK. Sample size determination for grouped exponential observation: a cost function approach. Biom J. 1993;35:677–688. doi: 10.1002/bimj.4710350605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tse S-K, Yang C, Yuen H-K. Design and analysis of survival data under an integrated type-II interval censoring scheme. J Biopharm Stat. 2002;12:333–345. doi: 10.1081/BIP-120014563
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu S-J, Chang C-T, Liao K-J, et al. Planning of progressive group-censoring life tests with cost considerations. J Appl Stat. 2008;35:1293–1304. doi: 10.1080/02664760802382392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuş C, Akdoğan Y, Wu S-J. Optimal progressive group censoring scheme under cost considerations for Pareto distribution. J Appl Stat. 2013;40:2437–2450. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2013.818107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawless JF. Statistical models and methods for lifetime data. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Wiley; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Lipscomb IP, Weaver PM, Swingler J, et al. The effect of relative humidity, temperature and electrical field on leakage current in piezo-ceramic actuators under dc bias. Sensor Actuator A–Phys. 2009;151:179–186. doi: 10.1016/j.sna.2009.01.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar