PLMIX: an R package for modelling and clustering partially ranked data

References

• Stern H. Probability models on rankings and the electoral process. In: Probability models and statistical analyses for ranking data. (Lecture Notes in Statist.; Vol. 80). New York: Springer; 1993. p. 173–195.
   Google Scholar
• Gormley IC, Murphy TB. Exploring voting blocs within the Irish electorate: a mixture modeling approach. J Amer Statist Assoc. 2008;103(483):1014–1027. doi: 10.1198/016214507000001049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigneau E, Courcoux P, Semenou M. Analysis of ranked preference data using latent class models. Food Qual Prefer. 1999;10(3):201–207. doi: 10.1016/S0950-3293(99)00017-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu PLH, Lam KF, Lo SM. Factor analysis for ranked data with application to a job selection attitude survey. J Roy Stat Soc Ser A (Stat Soc). 2005;168(3):583–597. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2005.00363.x
   Google Scholar
• Gormley IC, Murphy TB. Analysis of Irish third-level college applications data. J Roy Stat Soc Ser A. 2006;169(2):361–379. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00412.x
   Google Scholar
• Henery RJ. Permutation probabilities as models for horse races. J Roy Stat Soc Ser B (Stat Methodol). 1981;43(1):86–91.
   Google Scholar
• Stern H. Models for distributions on permutations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1990;85(410):558–564. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1990.10476235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caron F, Doucet A. Efficient Bayesian inference for generalized Bradley-Terry models. J Comput Graph Stat. 2012;21(1):174–196. doi: 10.1080/10618600.2012.638220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvo M, Yu PL. Statistical methods for ranking data. New York: Springer; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Crispino M, Scheel I, et al. Model-based learning from preference data. Annu Rev Stat Appl. 2019;6:329–354. doi: 10.1146/annurev-statistics-031017-100213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu PLH, Gu J, Xu H. Analysis of ranking data. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Stat. 2019;11(6):e1483. doi: 10.1002/wics.1483
   Google Scholar
• Mattei N, Walsh T. Preflib: A library of preference data http://preflib.org. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Algorithmic Decision Theory (ADT 2013). Springer; 2013. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence.
   Google Scholar
• Plackett RL. Random permutations. J Roy Stat Soc Ser B (Methodol). 1968;30(3):517–534.
   Google Scholar
• Critchlow DE, Fligner MA, Verducci JS. Probability models on rankings. J Math Psych. 1991;35(3):294–318. doi: 10.1016/0022-2496(91)90050-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marden JI. Analyzing and modeling rank data. Chapman & Hall; 1995. (Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability; Vol. 64).
   Google Scholar
• Thurstone LL. A law of comparative judgement. Psychol Rev. 1927;34:273–286. doi: 10.1037/h0070288
   Google Scholar
• Bradley RA, Terry ME. Rank analysis of incomplete block designs. Biometrika. 1952;39:324–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley RA. Paired comparisons: some basic procedures and examples. In: Nonparametric methods; (Handbook of Statist.; Vol. 4). North-Holland; 1984. p. 299–326.
   Google Scholar
• Mallows CL. Non-null ranking models. Biometrika. 1957;44:114–130. doi: 10.1093/biomet/44.1-2.114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverberg AR. Statistical models for q-permutations [Ph.D. Thesis]. ProQuest LLC, Ann Arbor, MI; 1980. Princeton University.
   Google Scholar
• Fligner MA, Verducci JS. Multistage ranking models. J Amer Statist Assoc. 1988;83(403):892–901. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1988.10478679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mollica C, Tardella L. PLMIX: Bayesian analysis of finite mixtures of Plackett-Luce models for partial rankings/orderings; 2019. R package version 2.1.1; Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=PLMIX.
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen O, Vitelli V, Crispino M. BayesMallows: Bayesian preference learning with the Mallows rank model; 2019. R package version 0.4.1; Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=BayesMallows.
   Google Scholar
• Vitelli V, Sørensen Ø, Crispino M, et al. Probabilistic preference learning with the Mallows rank model. J Mach Learn Res. 2018;18(158):1–49.
   Google Scholar
• Irurozki E, Calvo B, Lozano JA. PerMallows: Permutations and mallows distributions; 2017. R package version 1.13; Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=PerMallows.
   Google Scholar
• Irurozki E, Calvo Molinos B, Lozano Alonso JA. An R package for permutations, Mallows and Generalized Mallows models. Dept of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, University of the Basque Country; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Fligner MA, Verducci JS. Distance based ranking models. J Roy Stat Soc Ser B (Stat Methodol). 1986;48(3):359–369.
   Google Scholar
• Turner H, Kosmidis I, Firth D. PlackettLuce: Plackett-luce models for rankings; 2019. R package version 0.2-9; Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=PlackettLuce.
   Google Scholar
• Lee PH, Yu PLH. pmr: Probability models for ranking data; 2015. R package version 1.2.5; Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pmr.
   Google Scholar
• Lee PH, Yu PLH. An R package for analyzing and modeling ranking data. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13(1):65. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-65
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee PH, Yu PLH. Distance-based tree models for ranking data. Comput Statist Data Anal. 2010;54(6):1672–1682. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2010.01.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatzinger R. prefmod: Utilities to fit paired comparison models for preferences; 2017. R package version 0.8-34; Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=prefmod.
   Google Scholar
• Hatzinger R, Dittrich R. prefmod: an R package for modeling preferences based on paired comparisons, rankings, or ratings. J Stat Softw. 2012;48(10):1–31. Available from: http://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i10. doi: 10.18637/jss.v048.i10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimonprez Q, Jacques J. Rankcluster: model-based clustering for multivariate partial ranking data; 2019. R package version 0.94.1; Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Rankcluster.
   Google Scholar
• Jacques J, Grimonprez Q, Biernacki C. Rankcluster: an R package for clustering multivariate partial rankings. R J. 2014;6(1):10. doi: 10.32614/RJ-2014-010
   Google Scholar
• Jacques J, Biernacki C. Model-based clustering for multivariate partial ranking data. J Stat Plan Inference. 2014;149:201–217. doi: 10.1016/j.jspi.2014.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian Z. rankdist: Distance based ranking models; 2019. R package version 1.1.4; Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rankdist.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory E. RMallow: Fit multi-modal mallows' models to ranking data.; 2012. R package version 1.0.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy TB, Martin D. Mixtures of distance-based models for ranking data. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2003;41(3–4):645–655. doi: 10.1016/S0167-9473(02)00165-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu PLH. Bayesian analysis of order-statistics models for ranking data. Psychometrika. 2000;65(3):281–299. doi: 10.1007/BF02296147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soufiani HA, Chen W. StatRank: statistical rank aggregation: inference, evaluation, and visualization; 2015. R package version 0.0.6; Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=StatRank.
   Google Scholar
• Soufiani HA. Revisiting random utility models [Dissertation]. The School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Luce RD. Individual choice behavior: a theoretical analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1959.
   Google Scholar
• Plackett RL. The analysis of permutations. J Roy Stat Soc Ser C (Appl Stat). 1975;24(2):193–202.
   Google Scholar
• Mollica C, Tardella L. Bayesian mixture of Plackett-Luce models for partially ranked data. Psychometrika. 2017;82(2):442–458. doi: 10.1007/s11336-016-9530-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin DB. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J Roy Stat Soc Ser B (Stat Methodol). 1977;39(1):1–38. With discussion.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter DR. MM algorithms for generalized Bradley-Terry models. Ann Statist. 2004;32(1):384–406. doi: 10.1214/aos/1079120141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marin JM, Mengersen K, Robert CP. Bayesian modelling and inference on mixtures of distributions. Handbook Stat. 2005;25:459–507. doi: 10.1016/S0169-7161(05)25016-2
   Google Scholar
• Papastamoulis P. label.switching: Relabelling MCMC outputs of mixture models; 2019. R package version 1.8; Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=label.switching.
   Google Scholar
• Spiegelhalter DJ, Best NG, Carlin BP, et al. Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J Roy Stat Soc Ser B (Stat Methodol). 2002;64(4):583–639. doi: 10.1111/1467-9868.00353
   Google Scholar
• Ando T. Bayesian predictive information criterion for the evaluation of hierarchical Bayesian and empirical Bayes models. Biometrika. 2007;94(2):443–458. doi: 10.1093/biomet/asm017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raftery AE, Satagopan M Jaya, Newton MA, et al. Bayesian statistics 8. In: Bernardo J, Bayarri M, Berger J, et al., editors. Proceedings of the eighth Valencia International Meeting, June 2–6, 2006. Oxford University Press; 2007. p. 371–416.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen A, Mallows CL. Assessing goodness of fit of ranking models to data. J Roy Stat Soc Ser D (The Statistician). 1983;32(4):361–374.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman A, Meng XL, Stern H. Posterior predictive assessment of model fitness via realized discrepancies. Statistica Sinica. 1996;6(4):733–760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mollica C, Tardella L. Epitope profiling via mixture modeling of ranked data. Stat Med. 2014;33(21):3738–3758. doi: 10.1002/sim.6224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fienberg SE, Larntz K. Log linear representation for paired and multiple comparisons models. Biometrika. 1976;63(2):245–254. doi: 10.1093/biomet/63.2.245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mollica C, Tardella L. Bayesian analysis of ranking data with the Extended Plackett-Luce model. (submitted). 2019.
   Google Scholar