Testing independence between two nonhomogeneous point processes in time

References

• Tramblay Y, Neppel L, Carreau J, et al. Non-stationary frequency analysis of heavy rainfall events in southern France. Hydrological Sci J. 2013;58(2):280–294. doi: 10.1080/02626667.2012.754988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abaurrea J, Asín J, Cebrián AC. Modeling and projecting the occurrence of bivariate extreme heat events using a non-homogeneous common Poisson shock process. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. 2015;29:309–322. doi: 10.1007/s00477-014-0953-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Møller J, Waagepetersen R. Statistical inference and simulation for spatial point processes. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Cronie O, van Lieshout MNM. Summary statistics for inhomogeneous marked point processes. Ann Inst Stat Math. 2016;68(4):905–928. doi: 10.1007/s10463-015-0515-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlather M, Ribeiro PJ, Diggle PJ. Detecting dependence between marks and locations of marked point processes. J R Stat Soc B. 2004;66(1):79–93. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-7412.2003.05343.x
   Google Scholar
• Guan Y, Afshartous D. Test for independence between marks and points of marked point processes: a subsampling approach. Environ Ecol Stat. 2007;14:101–11. doi: 10.1007/s10651-007-0010-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allard D, Brix A, Chadoeuf J. Testing local independence between two point processes. Biometrics. 2001;57:508–17. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2001.00508.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doguwa SI. On correlations of neuronal spike discharges. J Stat Comput Simul. 1993;47(1-2):11–24. doi: 10.1080/00949659308811507
   Google Scholar
• Tuleau-Malot C, Rouis A, Grammont F, et al. Multiple tests based on a gaussian approximation of the unitary events method with delayed coincidence count. Neural Comput. 2014;26(7):1408–54. doi: 10.1162/NECO_a_00604
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albert M, Bouret Y, Fromont M, et al. Bootstrap and permutation tests of independence for point processes. Ann Stat. 2015;43(6):2537–2564. doi: 10.1214/15-AOS1351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutilleul P. Spatio-temporal heterogeneity: concepts and analyses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Abaurrea J, Asín J, Cebrián AC. A bootstrap test of independence between three temporal nonhomogeneous Poisson processes and its application to heat wave modeling. Environ Ecol Stat. 2015;22(1):127–144. doi: 10.1007/s10651-014-0288-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennig C, Hausdorf B. Distance-based parametric bootstrap tests for clustering of species ranges. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2004;45(4):875–895. doi: 10.1016/S0167-9473(03)00091-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennig C, Lin CJ. Flexible parametric bootstrap for testing homogeneity against clustering and assessing the number of clusters. Stat Comput. 2015;25(4):821–833. doi: 10.1007/s11222-015-9566-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myllymäki M, Mrkvicka T, Grabarnik P, et al. Global envelope tests for spatial processes. J R Stat Soc B. 2017;79(2):381–404. doi: 10.1111/rssb.12172
   Google Scholar
• Li CS, Lee SM, Yeh MS. A test for lack-of-fit of zero-inflated negative binomial models. J Stat Comput Simul. 2019;89(7):1301–1321. doi: 10.1080/00949655.2019.1577856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caron PO. A comparison of the type i error rates of three assessment methods for indirect effects. J Stat Comput Simul. 2019;89(8):1343–1356. doi: 10.1080/00949655.2019.1577858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotwick HW, Silverman BW. Methods for analysing spatial processes of several types of points. J R Stat Soc B. 1982;44:406–13.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon PM. Ripley's K function. In: El-Shaarawi AH, Piegorsch WW, editors. Encyclopedia of environmetrics. Vol. 3, Wiley Online Library; 2002. p. 1796–803.
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley AJ, Møller J, Waagepetersen R. Non- and semi-parametric estimation of interaction in inhomogeneous point patterns. Stat Neerl. 2000;54:329–50. doi: 10.1111/1467-9574.00144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daley D, Vere-Jones D. An introduction to the theory of point processes. vol ii: general theory and structure. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Lindskog P, McNeil A. Common Poisson shock models: applications to insurance and risk modelling. ASTIN Bull. 2003;33:209–38. doi: 10.1017/S0515036100013441
   Google Scholar
• Neyman J, Scott EL. Statistical approach to problems of cosmology. J R Stat Soc B. 1958;20:1–43.
   Google Scholar
• Keilson J, Servi L. Networks of nonhomogeneous M/G/∞ systems. J Appl Probab. 1994;31:157–68. doi: 10.1017/S0021900200107041
   Google Scholar
• Isham V. Dependent thinning of point processes. J Appl Probab. 1980;17(4):987–95. doi: 10.2307/3213208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Miranda JCS, Morettin P. Estimation of the intensity of non-homogeneous point processes via wavelets. Ann Inst Stat Math. 2011;63:1221–1246. doi: 10.1007/s10463-010-0283-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cebrián AC, Abaurrea J, Asín J. NHPoisson: an R package for fitting and validating nonhomogeneous Poisson processes. J Stat Softw. 2015;64(6):1–25. doi: 10.18637/jss.v064.i06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumanjug CF, Barrios EB, Lansangan JR. Bootstrap procedures in a spatial-temporal model. J Stat Comput Simul. 2010;80(7):809–822. doi: 10.1080/00949650902785209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abaurrea J, Asín J, Cebrián A. Modelling the occurrence of heat waves in maximum and minimum temperatures over Spain and projections for the period 2031–60. Global Planetary Change. 2018;161:244–260. doi: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2017.11.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar