Bayesian indirect inference for models with intractable normalizing functions

References

• Robins G, Pattison P, Kalish Y, et al. An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Soc Networks. 2007;29(2):173–191. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2006.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes J, Haran M, Caragea P. Autologistic models for binary data on a lattice. Environmetrics. 2011;22(7):857–871. doi: 10.1002/env.1102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein J, Haran M, Simeonov I, et al. An attraction-repulsion point process model for respiratory syncytial virus infections. Biometrics. 2015;71(2):376–385. doi: 10.1111/biom.12267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atchade Y, Lartillot N, Robert CP. Bayesian computation for statistical models with intractable normalizing constants. Braz J Probab Stat. 2008;27:416–436. doi: 10.1214/11-BJPS174
   Google Scholar
• Lyne A-M, Girolami M, Atchade Y, et al. On Russian roulette estimates for Bayesian inference with doubly-intractable likelihoods. Stat Sci. 2015;30(4):443–467. doi: 10.1214/15-STS523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park J, Haran M. A function emulation approach for doubly intractable distributions. J Comput Graph Stat. 2020;29(1):66–77. doi: 10.1080/10618600.2019.1629941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang F. A double Metropolis–Hastings sampler for spatial models with intractable normalizing constants. J Stat Comput Simul. 2010;80(9):1007–1022. doi: 10.1080/00949650902882162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Møller J, Pettitt AN, Reeves R, et al. An efficient Markov chain Monte Carlo method for distributions with intractable normalising constants. Biometrika. 2006;93(2):451–458. doi: 10.1093/biomet/93.2.451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray I, Ghahramani Z, MacKay DJC. MCMC for doubly-intractable distributions. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI-06). AUAI Press; 2006. p. 359–366.
   Google Scholar
• Park J, Haran M. Bayesian inference in the presence of intractable normalizing functions. J Am Stat Assoc. 2018;113(523):1372–1390. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2018.1448824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boland A, Friel N, Maire F. Efficient mcmc for gibbs random fields using pre-computation. Electron J Stat. 2018;12(2):4138–4179. doi: 10.1214/18-EJS1504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins H, Monro S. A stochastic approximation method. Ann Math Statist. 1951;22(3):400–407. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177729586
   Google Scholar
• Moores MT, Drovandi CC, Mengersen K, et al. Pre-processing for approximate Bayesian computation in image analysis. Stat Comput. 2015;25(1):23–33. doi: 10.1007/s11222-014-9525-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaumont MA, Zhang W, Balding DJ. Approximate Bayesian computation in population genetics. Genetics. 2002;162(4):2025–2035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Propp JG, Wilson DB. Exact sampling with coupled Markov chains and applications to statistical mechanics. Random Struct Algor. 1996;9(1–2):223–252. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2418(199608/09)9:1/2<223::AID-RSA14>3.0.CO;2-O
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drovandi CC, Pettitt AN, Faddy MJ. Approximate Bayesian computation using indirect inference. J R Stat Soc Ser C (Appl Statist). 2011;60(3):317–337. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9876.2010.00747.x
   Google Scholar
• Drovandi CC, Pettitt AN, Lee A. Bayesian indirect inference using a parametric auxiliary model. Stat Sci. 2015;30(1):72–95. doi: 10.1214/14-STS498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gourieroux C, Monfort A, Renault E. Indirect inference. J Appl Econom. 1993;8:S85–118. doi: 10.1002/jae.3950080507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood SN. Statistical inference for noisy nonlinear ecological dynamic systems. Nature. 2010;466(7310):1102. doi: 10.1038/nature09319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen CE. Gaussian processes in machine learning. In: Bousquet O, von Luxburg U, Rätsch G, editors. Advanced lectures on machine learning. ML 2003. Lecture notes in computer science, vol. 3176. Berlin: Springer; 2004. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-28650-9_4.
   Google Scholar
• Besag J. Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodol). 1974;36:192–236.
   Google Scholar
• Robert C, Casella G. Monte Carlo statistical methods. New York (NY): Springer Science & Business Media; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi RA, Ahmed NK. The network data repository with interactive graph analytics and visualization. Austin (TX): AAAI; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Šubelj L, Bajec M. Robust network community detection using balanced propagation. Eur Phys J B. 2011;81(3):353–362. doi: 10.1140/epjb/e2011-10979-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter DR, Handcock MS. Inference in curved exponential family models for networks. J Comput Graph Stat. 2006;15(3):565–583. doi: 10.1198/106186006X133069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnick MD, Bearman PS, Blum RW, et al. Protecting adolescents from harm: findings from the national longitudinal study on adolescent health. Jama. 1997;278(10):823–832. doi: 10.1001/jama.1997.03550100049038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabras S, Castellanos ME, Ruli E. A quasi likelihood approximation of posterior distributions for likelihood-intractable complex models. Metron. 2014;72(2):153–167. doi: 10.1007/s40300-014-0040-5
   Google Scholar
• Jin IH, Yuan Y, Liang F. Bayesian analysis for exponential random graph models using the adaptive exchange sampler. Stat Interface. 2013;6(4):559. doi: 10.4310/SII.2013.v6.n4.a13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripley BD. The second-order analysis of stationary point processes. J Appl Probab. 1976;13(2):255–266. doi: 10.2307/3212829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss DJ. A model for clustering. Biometrika. 1975;62(2):467–475. doi: 10.1093/biomet/62.2.467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar