Inference for a general family of inverted exponentiated distributions with partially observed competing risks under generalized progressive hybrid censoring

References

• Balakrishnan N, Aggarwala R. Progressive censoring: theory, methods, and applications. New York: Springer; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan N, Cramer E. The art of progressive censoring. New York: Springer; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Dey S, Dey T. On progressively censored generalized inverted exponential distribution. J Appl Stat. 2014;41(12):2557–2576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurya RK. Parameter estimation for a Burr XII distribution under progressive censoring. Am J Math Manage Sci. 2017;36(3):259–276.
   Google Scholar
• Pradhan B, Kundu D. Inference and optimal censoring schemes for progressively censored Birnbaum-Saunders distribution. J Stat Plann Infer. 2013;143(6):1098–1108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen A, Kannan N, Kundu D. Bayesian planning and inference of a progressively censored sample from linear hazard rate distribution. Comput Stat Data An. 2013;62:108–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh SK, Singh U, Kumar M. Bayesian estimation for Poisson exponential model under progressive type-II censoring data with binomial removal and its application to ovarian cancer data. Commun Stat Sim Comput. 2016;45(9):3457–3475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundu D. On hybrid censored Weibull distribution. J Stat Plann Infer. 2007;137(7):2127–2142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastogi MK, Tripathi YM. Inference on unknown parameters of a Burr distribution under hybrid censoring. Stat Pap. 2013;54(3):619–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundu D, Joarder A. Analysis of type-II progressively hybrid censored data. Computat Stat Data An. 2006;50(10):2509–2528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin CT, Chou CC, Huang YL. Inference for the Weibull distribution with progressive hybrid censoring. Comput Stat Data An. 2012;56(3):451–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin CT, Huang YL. On progressive hybrid censored exponential distribution. J Stat Comput Sim. 2012;82(5):689–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen T, Singh S, Tripathi YM. Statistical inference for Lognormal distribution with type-I progressive hybrid censored data. Am J Math Manage Sci. 2019;38(1):70–95.
   Google Scholar
• Sen T, Bhattacharya R, Tripathi YM, et al. Inference and optimum life testing plans based on type-II progressive hybrid censored generalized exponential data. Commun Stat Sim Comput. 2020;49(12):3254–3282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho Y, Sun H, Lee K. Exact likelihood inference for an exponential parameter under generalized progressive hybrid censoring scheme. Stat Methodol. 2015;23:18–34.
   Google Scholar
• Cramer E, Schmiedt AB. Progressively type-II censored competing risks data from Lomax distributions. Comput Stat Data An. 2011;55(3):1285–1303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koley A, Kundu D. On generalized progressive hybrid censoring in presence of competing risks. Metrika. 2017;80(4):401–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundu D, Pradhan B. Bayesian analysis of progressively censored competing risks data. Sankhya B. 2011;73(2):276–296.
   Google Scholar
• Wang L. Estimation for exponential distribution based on competing risk middle censored data. Commun Stat Theory M. 2016;45(8):2378–2391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L. Inference for Weibull competing risks data under generalized progressive hybrid censoring. IEEE Trans Reliab. 2018;67(3):998–1007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowder MJ. Classical competing risks. Florida: Chapman and Hall; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Pintilie M. Competing risks: a practical perspective. New York: Wiley; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Ghitany ME, Tuan VK, Balakrishnan N. Likelihood estimation for a general class of inverse exponentiated distributions based on complete and progressively censored data. J Stat Comput Sim. 2014;84(1):96–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abouammoh AM, Alshingiti AM. Reliability estimation of generalized inverted exponential distribution. J Stat Comp Sim. 2009;79(11):1301–1315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastogi MK, Tripathi YM. Estimation for an inverted exponentiated Rayleigh distribution under type-II progressive censoring. J Appl Stat. 2014;41(11):2375–2405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurya RK, Tripathi YM, Sen T, et al. Inference for an inverted exponentiated Pareto distribution under progressive censoring. J Stat Theory Prac. 2019;13(1):2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kizilaslan F. Classical and Bayesian estimation of reliability in a multicomponent stress-strength model based on a general class of inverse exponentiated distributions. Stat Pap. 2018;59(3):1161–1192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishna H, Kumar K. Reliability estimation in generalized inverted exponential distribution with progressively type-II censored sample. J Stat Comput Sim. 2013;83(6):1007–1019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh SK, Singh U, Kumar D. Bayes estimators of the reliability function and parameter of inverted exponential distribution using informative and non-informative priors. J Stat Comput Sim. 2013;83(12):2258–2269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pena EA, Gupta AK. Bayes estimation for the Marshall-Olkin exponential distribution. J Roy Stat Soc Ser B. 1990;52(2):379–389.
   Google Scholar
• Chen MH, Shao QM. Monte Carlo estimation of Bayesian credible and HPD intervals. J Comput Graph Stat. 1990;8:69–92.
   Google Scholar
• Mondal S, Kundu D. Point and interval estimation of weibull parameters based on joint progressively censored data. Sankhya B: Indian J Stat. 2019;81(1):1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan N, Sandhu RA. A simple simulational algorithm for generating progressive type-II censored samples. Am Stat. 1995;49(2):229–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park C, Kulasekera KB. Parametric inference of incomplete data with competing risks among several groups. IEEE T Reliab. 2004;53(1):11–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawless JF. Statistical models and methods for lifetime data. New York: Wiley; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Kundu D, Sarhan AM. Analysis of incomplete data in presence of competing risks among several groups. IEEE T Reliab. 2006;55(2):262–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Tripathi YM, Lodhi C. Inference for Weibull competing risks model with partially observed failure causes under generalized progressive hybrid censoring. J Comput Appl Math. 2020;368:112537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar