The joint influence of estimation of sensitive variable under measurement error and non-response using ORRT models

References

• Warner SL. Randomized response: a survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. J Am Stat Assoc. 1965;60(309):63–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg BG, Kuebler Jr. RR, Abernathy JR, et al. Application of the randomized response techniques in obtaining quantitative data. J Am Stat Assoc. 1971;66:243–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eichhorn BH, Hayre LS. Scrambled randomized response methods for obtaining sensitive quantitative data. J Stat Plan Inference. 1983;7:307–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Gupta B, Singh S. Estimation of sensitivity level of personal interview survey questions. J Stat Plan Inference. 2002;100:239–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Shabbir J, Sehra SJ. Mean and sensitivity estimation in optional randomized response models. J Stat Plan Inference. 2010;140(10):2870–2874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diana G, Perri PF. A class of estimators for quantitative sensitive data. Stat Pap. 2011;52:633–650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Shabbir J, Sousa R, et al. Estimation of the mean of a sensitive variable in the presence of auxiliary information. Commun Stat Theory Methods. 2012;41(13–14):2394–2404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Kalucha J, Shabbir J, et al. Estimation of finite population mean using optional RRT models in the presence of nonsensitive auxiliary information. Am J Math Manag Sci. 2014;33(2):147–159.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Kalucha G, Shabbir J. A regression estimator for finite population mean of a sensitive variable using an optional randomized response model. Commun Stat - Simul Comput. 2015;46(3):2393–2405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Shabbir J, Sousa R, et al. Improved exponential type estimators of the mean of a sensitive variable in the presence of non-sensitive auxiliary information. Commun Stat - Simul Comput. 2016;45(9):3317–3328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Mehta S, Shabbir J, et al. A unified measure of respondent privacy and model efficiency in quantitative RRT models. J Stat Theory Pract. 2018;12(3):506–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Kalucha G, Gupta S, et al. Ratio estimation of the mean under RRT models. J Stat Manag Syst. 2018;22(1):97–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen MH, Hurwitz WN. The problem of non-response in sample surveys. J Am Stat Assoc. 1946;41:517–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan W, Yan Z. Factors affecting response rates of the web survey: a systematic review. Comput Hum Behav. 2010;26(2):132–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar MM, Dillman DA. Improving response to web and mixed mode surveys. Public Opin Q. 2011;75(2):249–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foradori GT. Some non-response sampling theory for two stage designs. Mimeo. 1961;297:1–105.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran WG. Sampling techniques. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley; 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Khare BB, Srivastava S. Transformed ratio type estimators for the population mean in presence of non-response. Commun Stat Theory Methods. 1997;26:1779–1791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khare BB, Srivastava S. Generalized two phase estimators for the population mean in the presence of non-response. Aligarh J Stat. 2010;30:39–54.
   Google Scholar
• Singh HP, Kumar S. Estimation of mean in presence of non-response using two-phase sampling scheme. Stat Pap. 2008;51:559–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh HP, Kumar S. A general procedure of estimating the population mean in the presence of non-response under double sampling using auxiliary information. Stat Oper Res Trans. 2009;33:71–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh HP, Kumar S. Combination of regression and ratio estimate in presence of non-response. Braz J Probab Stat. 2011;25(2):205–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh HP, Kumar S, Kozak M. Improve estimation of finite population mean using sub-sampling to deal with the non-response in two-phase sampling scheme. Commun Stat Theory Methods. 2010;39(5):791–802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Bhougal S. Estimation of the population mean in presence of non-response. Commun Korean Stat Soc. 2011;18(1):1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Guha S, Chandra H. Improved estimation of finite population mean in two-phase sampling with sub-sampling of the non-respondents. Math Popul Stud. 2019;28(1):24–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diana G, Riaz S, Shabbir J. Hansen and Hurwitz estimator with scrambled response on the second call. J Appl Stat. 2014;41(3):596–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed S, Shabbir J, Gupta S. Use of scrambled response model in estimating the finite population mean in presence of non-response when coefficient of variation is known. Commun Stat Theory Methods. 2017;46(17):8435–8449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azeem M. On estimation of population mean in the presence of measurement error and non-response, Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, National College of Business Administration and Economics, Lahore; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Azeem M, Hanif M. Joint influence of measurement error and non-response on the estimation of population mean. Commun Stat Theory Methods. 2017;46(4):1679–1693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh SR, Sharma P. Method of estimation in the presence of non-response and measurement errors simultaneously. J Mod Appl Stat Methods. 2015;14(1):107–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Trehan M, Joorel JPS. A simulation study: estimation of population mean using two auxiliary variables in stratified random sampling. J Stat Comput Simul. 2018;88(1):1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Sharma V. Study on non-response and measurement error using double sampling scheme. J Sci Appl Probab Lett. 2020;7(2):87–96.
   Google Scholar
• Zahid E, Shabbir J. Estimation of finite population mean for a sensitive variable using dual auxiliary information in the presence of measurement errors. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(2):Article ID e0212111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212111 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Khalil S, Gupta S. Mean estimation of sensitive variables under non-response and measurement errors using optional RRT models. J Stat Theory Pract. 2021;15(3):1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Pollock K, Bek Y. A comparison of three randomized response models for quantitative data. J Am Stat Assoc. 1976;71(356):884–886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan Z, Wang J, Lai J. An efficiency and protection degree-based comparison among the quantitative randomized response strategies. Commun Stat Theory Methods. 2008;38(3):400–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen J, Singh HP, Smarandache F. A family of estimators of population mean using multi-auxiliary information in presence of measurement errors. Int J Soc Econ Inform. 2003;30(7):837–848.
   Google Scholar
• Khalil S, Gupta S, Hanif M. Estimation of finite population mean in stratified sampling using scrambled responses in the presence of measurement errors. Commun Stat Theory Methods. 2018;48(6):1553–1561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalil S, Zhang Q, Gupta S. Mean estimation of sensitive variables under measurement errors using optional RRT models. Commun Stat Simul Comput. 2019;50(5):1417–1426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar M, Singh R, Singh AK, et al. Some ratio type estimators under measurement errors. World Appl Sci J. 2011;14(2):272–276.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Bhougal S, Nataraja NS, et al. Estimation of population mean in the presence of non-response and measurement error. Rev Colomb Estad. 2015;38(1):145–161.
   Google Scholar