Bayesian elastic net based on empirical likelihood

References

• Tibshirani R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J R Stat Soc B. 1996;58(1):267–288.
   Google Scholar
• Tikhonov AN, Nikolayevich N. On the stability of inverse problems. Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR. 1943;39(5):195–198.
   Google Scholar
• Zou H, Hastie T. Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. J R Stat Soc B. 2005;67(2):301–320.
   Google Scholar
• Fan J, Li R. Variable selection via nonconcave penalized likelihood and its oracle properties. J Am Stat Assoc. 2001;96(456):1348–1360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang CH. Nearly unbiased variable selection under minimax concave penalty. Ann Stat. 2010;38(2):894–942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bühlmann P, Van De Geer S. Statistics for high-dimensional data: methods, theory and applications. Heidelberg: Springer Science & Business Media; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Tutz G, Ulbricht J. Penalized regression with correlation-based penalty. Stat Comput. 2009;19(3):239–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park T, Casella G. The bayesian lasso. J Am Stat Assoc. 2008;103(482):681–686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Q, Lin N. The bayesian elastic net. Bayesian Anal. 2010;5(1):151–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishwaran H, Rao JS. Spike and slab variable selection: frequentist and bayesian strategies. Ann Stat. 2005;33(2):730–773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho CM, Polson NG, Scott JG. The horseshoe estimator for sparse signals. Biometrika. 2010;97(2):465–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin JE, Brown PJ. Bayesian hyper-lassos with non-convex penalization. Aust N Z J Stat. 2011;53(4):423–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen M, Carlson D, Zaas A, et al. Detection of viruses via statistical gene expression analysis. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2010;58(3):468–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang A, Xu S, Cai X. Empirical bayesian elastic net for multiple quantitative trait locus mapping. Heredity. 2015;114(1):107–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alhamzawi R. Bayesian elastic net tobit quantile regression. Commun Stat Simul Comput. 2016;45(7):2409–2427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alshaybawee T, Midi H, Alhamzawi R. Bayesian elastic net single index quantile regression. J Appl Stat. 2017;44(5):853–871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alhamzawi R, Ali HTM. The bayesian elastic net regression. Commun Stat Simul Comput. 2018;47(4):1168–1178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyung M, Gill J, Ghosh M, et al. Penalized regression, standard errors, and bayesian lassos. Bayesian Anal. 2010;5(2):369–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hans C. Bayesian lasso regression. Biometrika. 2009;96(4):835–845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen AB. Empirical likelihood ratio confidence intervals for a single functional. Biometrika. 1988;75(2):237–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen AB. Empirical likelihood ratio confidence regions. Ann Stat. 1990;18(1):90–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiCiccio T, Hall P, Romano J. Empirical likelihood is bartlett-correctable. Ann Stat. 1991;19(2):1053–1061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen SX, Cui H. On bartlett correction of empirical likelihood in the presence of nuisance parameters. Biometrika. 2006;93(1):215–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin J, Lawless J. Empirical likelihood and general estimating equations. Ann Stat. 1994;22(1):300–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall P, Owen AB. Empirical likelihood confidence bands in density estimation. J Comput Graph Stat. 1993;2(3):273–289.
   Google Scholar
• Qin G, Zhou XH. Empirical likelihood inference for the area under the roc curve. Biometrics. 2006;62:613–622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang D, Chen SX. Empirical likelihood for estimating equations with missing values. Ann Stat. 2009;37(1):490–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen SX, Keilegom IV. A review on empirical likelihood methods for regression. TEST. 2009;18:415–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjort NL, McKeague IW, Van Keilegom I. Extending the scope of empirical likelihood. Ann Stat. 2009;37(3):1079–1111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen SX, Peng L, Qin YL. Effects of data dimension on empirical likelihood. Biometrika. 2009;96(3):711–722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang CY, Leng C. Penalized high-dimensional empirical likelihood. Biometrika. 2010;97(4):905–920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leng C, Tang CY. Penalized empirical likelihood and growing dimensional general estimating equations. Biometrika. 2012;99(3):703–716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan J, Peng H. Nonconcave penalized likelihood with a diverging number of parameters. Ann Stat. 2004;32(3):928–961.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahiri SN, Mukhopadhyay S. A penalized empirical likelihood method in high dimensions. Ann Stat. 2012;40(5):2511–2540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang J, Tang CY, Wu TT. A new scope of penalized empirical likelihood with high-dimensional estimating equations. Ann Stat. 2018;46(6B):3185–3216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazar NA. Bayesian empirical likelihood. Biometrika. 2003;90(2):319–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grendar M, Judge G. Asymptotic equivalence of empirical likelihood and bayesian map. Ann Stat. 2009;37(5a):2445–2457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang KT, Mukerjee R. Empirical-type likelihoods allowing posterior credible sets with frequentist validity: higher-order asymptotics. Biometrika. 2006;93(3):723–733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang IH, Mukerjee R. Bayesian and frequentist confidence intervals arising from empirical-type likelihoods. Biometrika. 2008;95(1):139–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao JNK, Wu C. Bayesian pseudo-empirical-likelihood intervals for complex surveys. J R Stat Soc B. 2010;72(4):533–544.
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri S, Ghosh M. Empirical likelihood for small area estimation. Biometrika. 2011;98(2):473–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, He X. Bayesian empirical likelihood for quantile regression. Ann Stat. 2012;40(2):1102–1131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mengersen KL, Pudlo P, Robert CP. Bayesian computation via empirical likelihood. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(4):1321–1326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri S, Mondal D, Yin T. Hamiltonian monte carlo sampling in bayesian empirical likelihood computation. J R Stat Soc B. 2017;79(1):293–320.
   Google Scholar
• Bedoui A, Lazar AN. Bayesian empirical likelihood for ridge and lasso regressions. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2020;145:106917.
   Google Scholar
• Chib S, Greenberg E. Understanding the metropolis-hastings algorithm. Am Stat. 1995;49(4):327–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen AB. Empirical likelihood. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews DF, Mallows CI. Scale mixtures of normal distributions. J R Stat Soc B. 1974;36(1):99–102.
   Google Scholar
• Hörmann W, Leydold J. Generating generalized inverse gaussian random variates. Stat Comput. 2014;24(4):547–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neal RM. Mcmc using hamiltonian dynamics. Handbook of Markov Chain Monte Carlo. 2011;2(11):2.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman MD, Gelman A, Nan S. The no-u-turn sampler: adaptively setting path lengths in hamiltonian monte carlo. J Mach Learn Res. 2014;15(1):1593–1623.
   Google Scholar
• Burden R, Faires J, Burden A. Numerical analysis. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Beskos A, Pillai N, Roberts G, et al. Optimal tuning of the hybrid monte carlo algorithm. Bernoulli. 2013;19(5A):1501–1534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vehtari A, Gelman A, Simpson D, et al. Rank-normalization, folding, and localization: an improved R^ for assessing convergence of mcmc. Bayesian Anal. 2021;1(1):1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Casella G. Empirical bayes gibbs sampling. Biostatistics. 2001;2(4):485–500.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li J, Das K, Fu G, et al. The bayesian lasso for genome-wide association studies. Bioinformatics. 2011;27(4):516–523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasanen L, Holmström L, Sillanpää MJ. Bayesian lasso, scale space and decision making in association genetics. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(4):e0120017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardo JM, Smith AFM. Bayesian theory. Chichester, New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Wang H, Li G, Jiang G. Robust regression shrinkage and consistent variable selection through the lad-lasso. J Bus Econ Stat. 2007;25(3):347–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández C, Steel MF. On bayesian modeling of fat tails and skewness. J Am Stat Assoc. 1998;93(441):359–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuertz D, Setz T, Chalabi Y, et al. fgarch: Rmetrics – autoregressive conditional heteroskedastic modelling; 2020. R package version 3042.83.2.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald GC, Schwing RC. Instabilities of regression estimates relating air pollution to mortality. Technometrics. 1973;15(3):463–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stan Development Team. Stan modeling language users guide and reference manual, version 2.28 ; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Salvatier J, Wiecki TV, Fonnesbeck C. Probabilistic programming in python using pymc3. Peer J Comput Sci. 2016;2:e55.
   Google Scholar