On kernel-based estimation of distribution function and its quantiles based on ranked set sampling

References

• McIntyre G. A method for unbiased selective sampling, using ranked sets. Crop Pasture Sci. 1952;3(4):385–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadaraya EA. Some new estimates for distribution functions. Theory Probab Its Appl. 1964;9(3):497–500.
   Google Scholar
• Azzalini A. A note on the estimation of a distribution function and quantiles by a kernel method. Biometrika. 1981;68(1):326–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lio Y, Padgett W. A note on the asymptotically optimal bandwidth for Nadaraya's quantile estimator. Stat Probab Lett. 1991;11(3):243–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones MC. Estimating densities, quantiles, quantile densities and density quantiles. Ann Inst Stat Math. 1992;44(4):721–727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Z. On ranked-set sample quantiles and their applications. J Stat Plan Inference. 2000;83(1):125–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samawi HM. On quantifies estimation using ranked samples with some applications. J Korean Stat Soc. 2001;30(4):667–678.
   Google Scholar
• Mahdizadeh M, Arghami NR. Quantile estimation using ranked set samples from a population with known mean. Commun Stat Simul Comput. 2012;41(10):1872–1881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Dong X, Xu X, et al. Weighted estimation of quantiles using unbalanced ranked set sampling. Qual Technol Quant Manag. 2014;11(3):281–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eftekharian A, Razmkhah M. On estimating the distribution function and odds using ranked set sampling. Stat Probab Lett. 2017;122:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashour SK, Abdallah MS. New distribution function estimators and tests of perfect ranking in concomitant-based ranked set sampling. Commun Stat Simul Comput. 2020;51(3):823–848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eftekharian A, Samawi H. On kernel-based quantile estimation using different stratified sampling schemes with optimal allocation. J Stat Comput Simul. 2021;91(5):1040–1056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashorva E, Hüsler J. Estimation of tails and related quantities using the number of near-extremes. Commun Stat Theory Methods. 2005;34(2):337–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith RL. Estimating tails of probability distributions. Ann Stat. 1987;15(3):1174–1207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theil H, Kidwai SA, Yellé KA. Normal probability plots and the estimation of distribution tails. Econ Lett. 1982;10(3-4):299–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodionov I. Inferences on parametric estimation of distribution tails. Dokl Math. 2019;100(2):456–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffie D, Pan J. An overview of value at risk. J Deriv. 1997;4(3):7–49.
   Google Scholar
• Hong LJ. Estimating quantile sensitivities. Oper Res. 2009;57(1):118–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasserman P, Heidelberger P, Shahabuddin P. Variance reduction techniques for estimating value-at-risk. Manage Sci. 2000;46(10):1349–1364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasserman P, Heidelberger P, Shahabuddin P. Portfolio value-at-risk with heavy-tailed risk factors. Math Financ. 2002;12(3):239–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Bai Z, Sinha B. Ranked set sampling: theory and applications. New York: Springer Science & Business Media; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Lejeune M, Sarda P. Smooth estimators of distribution and density functions. Comput Stat Data Anal. 1992;14(4):457–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim C, Kim S, Park M, et al. A bias reducing technique in kernel distribution function estimation. Comput Stat. 2006;21(3):589–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahadur RR. A note on quantiles in large samples. Ann Math Stat. 1966;37(3):577–580.
   Google Scholar
• Choi E, Hall P. On bias reduction in local linear smoothing. Biometrika. 1998;85(2):333–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vock M, Balakrishnan N. A jonckheere–terpstra-type test for perfect ranking in balanced ranked set sampling. J Stat Plan Inference. 2011;141(2):624–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan S, Li J, Li S, et al. The expanding burden of cardiometabolic risk in china: the china health and nutrition survey. Obes Rev. 2012;13(9):810–821.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samawi HM, Al-Sagheer OA. On the estimation of the distribution function using extreme and median ranked set sampling. Biom J Math Methods Biosci. 2001;43(3):357–373.
   Google Scholar