An EWMA sign chart for dispersion with exact run length properties

References

• Shewhart WA. Quality control charts. The Bell Syst Technical J. 1926;5(4):593–603.
   Google Scholar
• Page ES. Continuous inspection schemes. Biometrika. 1954;41(1/2):100–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts SW. Control chart tests based on geometric moving averages. Technometrics. 1959;1:239–250.
   Google Scholar
• Amin RW, Searcy AJ. A nonparametric exponentially weighted moving average control scheme. Commun Statistics-Simul Comput. 1991;20(4):1049–1072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham MA, Chakraborti S, Human SW. A nonparametric EWMA sign chart for location based on individual measurements. Qual Eng. 2011;23(3):227–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang S-F, Lin J-S, Cheng SW. A new nonparametric EWMA sign control chart. Expert Syst Appl. 2011;38(5):6239–6243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam M, Azam M, Jun CH. A new exponentially weighted moving average sign chart using repetitive sampling. J Process Control. 2014;24(7):1149–1153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riaz M. A sensitive non-parametric EWMA control chart. J Chinese Inst Eng. 2015;38(2):208–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu SL. An extended nonparametric exponentially weighted moving average sign control chart. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2015;31(1):3–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haq A. A new nonparametric synthetic EWMA control chart for monitoring process mean. Commun Statist-Simul Comput. 2019;48(6):1665–1676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin RW, Reynolds J.MR, Bakir S. Nonparametric quality control charts based on the sign statistic. Commun Statist-Theory Methods. 1995;24(6):1597–1623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murakami H, Matsuki T. A nonparametric control chart based on the mood statistic for dispersion. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2010;49(5-8):757–763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das N, Bhattacharya A. A new non-parametric control chart for controlling variability. Qual Technol Quant Manag. 2008;5(4):351–361.
   Google Scholar
• Das N. A note on the efficiency of nonparametric ccontrol chart for monitoring process variability. Economic Qual Control. 2008;23(1):85–93.
   Google Scholar
• Zou C, Tsung F. Likelihood ratio-based distribution-free EWMA control charts. J Qual Technol. 2010;42(2):174–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhury S, Mukherjee A, Chakraborti S. Distribution-free phase II CUSUM control chart for joint monitoring ofLocation and scale. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2015;31(1):135–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang S-F, Arnold B-C. A new approach for monitoring process variance. J Stat Comput Simul. 2016;86(14):2749–2765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haq A. A new nonparametric EWMA control chart for monitoring process variability. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2017;33(7):1499–1512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee A, Marozzi M. A distribution-free phase-II CUSUM procedure for monitoring service quality. Total Qual Manage Business Excellence. 2017;28(11-12):1227–1263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborti S, Van der Laan P, Bakir ST. Nonparametric control charts: an overview and some results. J Qual Technol. 2001;33(3):304–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborti S, Graham MA. Nonparametric (distribution-free) control charts: an updated overview and some result. Qual Eng. 2019;31(4):523–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brook D, Evans DA. An approach to the probability distribution of CUSUM run length. Biometrika. 1972;59(3):539–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu S, Castagliola P, Celano G. A distribution-free EWMA control chart for monitoring time-between-events-and-amplitude data. J Appl Stat. 2020;3(48):434–454.
   Google Scholar
• Perdikis T, Psarakis S, Castagliola P, et al. An EWMA signed ranks control chart with reliable run length performances. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2021;37(3):1266–1284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castagliola P, Tran KP, Celano G, et al. An EWMA-type sign chart with exact run length properties. J Qual Technol. 2019;51(1):51–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakitzis AC, Castagliola P, Maravelakis PE. A new memory-type monitoring technique for count data. Comput Ind Eng. 2015;85:235–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang A, Sun J, Hu X, et al. A new nonparametric adaptive EWMA control chart with exact run length properties. Comput Ind Eng. 2019;130:404–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perdikis T, Psarakis S, Castagliola P, et al. An EWMA-type chart based on signed ranks with exact run length properties. J Stat Comput Simul. 2021;91(4):732–751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawar VY, Shirke DT, Khilare SK. A nonparametric control chart for process variability based on quantiles. Int J Statist Econ. 2018;19(3):55–64.
   Google Scholar
• Neuts MF. Matrix-geometric solutions in stochastic models: an algorithmic approach. New York: Dover Publications Inc.; 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Latouche G, Ramaswami V. Introduction to matrix analytic methods in stochastic modeling. Philadelphia: ASA-SIAM; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Castagliola P, Tran KP, Celano G, et al. The shewhart sign chart with ties: performance and alternatives. In: Distribution-free methods for statistical process monitoring and control. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland AG; 2020. p. 107–136.
   Google Scholar
• Wu S, Castagliola P, Rakitzis AC, et al. Design of attribute EWMA type control charts with reliable run length performance. Commun Statist Simul Comput. 2021. DOI:10.1080/03610918.2021.1955263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perdikis T, Psarakis S, Castagliola P, et al. The EWMA sign chart revisited: performance and alternatives without and with ties. J Appl Stat. 2021;50(1):170–194.
   Google Scholar
• Khoo M-BC, Lim EG. An improved R (range) control chart for monitoring the process variance. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2005;21(1):43–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yhang G. Improved R and S control charts for monitoring the process variance. J Appl Statist. 2014;41(6):1260–1273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Castagliola P, Celano G, Fichera S. Monitoring process variability using EWMA. In: Handbook of engineering statistics. London: Springer; 2006. p. 291–325.
   Google Scholar