Mixture regression modelling based on the shape mixtures of skew Laplace normal distribution

References

• Titterington DM, Smith AFM, Markov UE. Statistical analysis of finite mixture distributions. New York: Wiley; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• McLachlan GJ, Basford KE. Mixture models: inference and application to clustering. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• McLachlan GJ, Peel D. Finite mixture models. New York: Wiley; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop CM. Pattern recognition and machine learning. Singapore: Springer; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Frühwirth-Schnatter S. Finite mixture and Markov switching models. New York: Springer; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Quandt RE. A new approach to estimating switching regressions. J Am Stat Assoc. 1972;67(338):306–310. doi:10.1080/01621459.1972.10482378
   Google Scholar
• Quandt RE, Ramsey JB. Estimating mixtures of normal distributions and switching regressions. J Am Stat Assoc. 1978;73(364):730–738. doi:10.1080/01621459.1978.10480085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Späth H. Algorithm 39 clusterwise linear regression. Computing. 1979;22(4):367–373. doi:10.1007/BF02265317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei Y. Robust mixture regression models using t-distribution. Master Report, Kansas State University; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Yao W, Wei Y, Yu C. Robust mixture regression using the t-distribution. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2014;71:116–127. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2013.07.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J. Robust mixture regression modeling with Pearson Type VII distribution. Master Report, Kansas State University; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Song W, Yao W, Xing Y. Robust mixture regression model fitting by Laplace distribution. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2014;71:128–137. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2013.06.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu M, Lin T-I. A skew-normal mixture regression model. Educ Psychol Meas. 2014;74(1):139–162. doi:10.1177/0013164413498603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azzalini A. A class of distributions which includes the normal ones. Scand J Stat. 1985;12(2):171–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azzalini A. Further results on a class of distributions which includes the normal ones. Statistica. 1986;46(2):199–208.
   Google Scholar
• Doğru, FZ. Robust parameter estimation in mixture regression models [PhD thesis]. Ankara University; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Doğru FZ, Arslan O. Robust mixture regression based on the skew t distribution. Rev Colomb Estad. 2017;40(1):45–64. doi:10.15446/rce.v40n1.53580
   Google Scholar
• Azzalini A, Capitanio A. Distributions generated by perturbation of symmetry with emphasis on a multivariate skew t distribution. J R Stat Soc Ser B. 2003;65(2):367–389. doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00391
   Google Scholar
• Doğru FZ, Arslan O. Robust mixture regression using the mixture of different distributions. In: Agostinelli C, Basu A, Filzmoser P, etal, editors. Recent advances in robust statistics: theory and applications. New Delhi: Springer India; 2016. p. 57–79.
   Google Scholar
• Doğru FZ, Arslan O. Parameter estimation for mixtures of skew Laplace normal distributions and application in mixture regression modeling. Commun Stat Theory Methods. 2017;46(21):10879–10896. doi:10.1080/03610926.2016.1252400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez HW, Venegas O, Bolfarine H. Skew-symmetric distributions generated by the distribution function of the normal distribution. Environmetrics. 2007;18:395–407. doi:10.1002/env.817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doğru FZ, Arslan O. Finite mixtures of skew Laplace normal distributions with random skewness. 11th International Statistics Congress (ISC2019); Bodrum/Turkey; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Ho H, Pyne S, Lin T. Maximum likelihood inference for mixtures of skew Student-t-normal distributions through practical EM-type algorithms. Stat Comput. 2012;22(1):287–299. doi:10.1007/s11222-010-9225-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doğru FZ, Arslan O. Finite mixtures of skew Laplace normal distributions with random skewness. Comput Stat. 2021;36(1):423–447. doi:10.1007/s00180-020-01025-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamandi M, Jamalizadeh A, Lin TI. Shape mixtures of skew-t-normal distributions: characterizations and estimation. Comput Stat. 2019;34(1):323–347. doi:10.1007/s00180-018-0835-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henze N. A probabilistic representation of the skew-normal distribution. Scand J Stat. 1986;13(4):271–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H-Q, Wu L-C, Yi J-Y. A skew–normal mixture of joint location, scale and skewness models. Appl Math A J Chinese Univ. 2016;31(3):283–295. doi:10.1007/s11766-016-3367-2
   Google Scholar
• Hennig C. Identifiablity of models for clusterwise linear regression. J Classif. 2000;17(2):273–296. doi:10.1007/s003570000022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang P, Puterman ML, Cockburn I, et al. Mixed Poisson regression models with covariate dependent rates. Biometrics. 1996;52:381–400. doi:10.2307/2532881
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin DB. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J R Stat Soc Ser B. 1977;39:1–38.
   Google Scholar
• Hathaway RJ. A constrained formulation of maximum-likelihood estimation for normal mixture distributions. Ann Stat. 1985;13(2):795–800. doi:10.1214/aos/1176349557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J, Tan X, Zhang R. Inference for normal mixtures in mean and variance. Stat Sin. 2008;18(2):443–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao W. A profile likelihood method for normal mixture with unequal variance. J Stat Plan Inference. 2010;140(7):2089–2098. doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2010.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dias JG, Wedel M. An empirical comparison of EM, SEM and MCMC performance for problematic Gaussian mixture likelihoods. Stat Comput. 2004;14:323–332. doi:10.1023/B:STCO.0000039481.32211.5a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLachlan GJ, Krishnan T. The EM algorithm and extensions. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Bai X, Yao W, Boyer JE. Robust fitting of mixture regression models. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2012;56(7):2347–2359. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2012.01.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Escudero LA, Gordaliza A, Mayo-Iscar A, et al. Robust clusterwise linear regression through trimming. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2010;54(12):3057–3069. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2009.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doğru FZ, Arslan O. Robust mixture regression modeling using the least trimmed squares (LTS)-estimation method. Commun Stat Simul Comput. 2018;47(7):2184–2196. doi:10.1080/03610918.2017.1341528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akaike H. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov BN, Caski F, editors. Proceeding of the second international symposium on information theory. Budapest: Akademiai Kiado; 1973. p. 267–281.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz G. Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat. 1978;6(2):461–464. doi:10.1214/aos/1176344136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai Z-D, Krishnaiah PR, Zhao LC. On rates of convergence of efficient detection criteria in signal processing with white noise. IEEE Trans Inf Theory. 1989;35:380–388. doi:10.1109/18.32132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basford KE, Greenway DR, McLachlan GJ, et al. Standard errors of fitted means under normal mixture. Comput Stat. 1997;12:1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar