Modelling recall-based competing risks data with k different models

References

• Diamond ID, McDonald JW, Shah IH. Proportional hazards models for current status data: application to the study of differentials in age at weaning in Pakistan. Demography. 1986;23(4):607–620. doi:10.2307/2061354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewell NP, van der Laan M. Current status data: review, recent developments and open problems. Handb Stat. 2003;23:625–642. doi:10.1016/S0169-7161(03)23035-2
   Google Scholar
• Huang J, Wellner JA. Interval censored survival data: a review of recent progress. In: Proceedings of the First Seattle Symposium in Biostatistics; New York, NY: Springer; 1997. p. 123–169. doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-6316-3_8
   Google Scholar
• Sun J. The statistical analysis of interval censored failure time data. New York, NY: Springer; 2007. doi:10.1007/0-387-37119-2
   Google Scholar
• Turnbull BW, Weiss L. A likelihood ratio statistic for testing goodness of fit with randomly censored data. Biometrics. 1978;34(3):367–375. doi:10.2307/2530599
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salehabadi SM, Sengupta D, Das R. Parametric estimation of menarcheal age distribution based on recall data. Scand J Stat. 2015;42(1):290–305. doi:10.1111/sjos.v42.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David HA, Moeschberger ML. The theory of competing risks. London, UK: C. Griffin.; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Crowder MJ. Classical competing risks. USA: CRC Press; 2001. doi:10.1201/9781420035902
   Google Scholar
• Usher JS, Hodgson TJ. Maximum likelihood analysis of component reliability using masked system life-test data. IEEE Trans Reliab. 1988;37(5):550–555. doi:10.1109/24.9880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarhan AM. Estimations of parameters in Pareto reliability model in the presence of masked data. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2003;82(1):75–83. doi:10.1016/S0951-8320(03)00125-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomer SK, Singh AK, Panwar MS. Bayesian analysis of masked series system lifetime data from a family of lifetime distributions. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag. 2014;5(4):495–502. doi:10.1007/s13198-013-0191-4
   Google Scholar
• Krailo MD, Pike MC. Estimation of the distribution of age at natural menopause from prevalence data. Am J Epidemiol. 1983;117(3):356–361. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113548
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keiding N, Begtrup K, Scheike TH, et al. Estimation from current-status data in continuous time. Lifetime Data Anal. 1996;2(2):119–129. doi:10.1007/BF00128570
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maathuis MH, Hudgens MG. Nonparametric inference for competing risks current status data with continuous, discrete or grouped observation times. Biometrika. 2011;98(2):325–340. doi:10.1093/biomet/asq083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koley T, Dewanji A. Current status data with two competing risks and missing failure types: a non-parametric approach. Available from: https://www.isical.ac.in/asu/TR/TechRepASU201901.pdf, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Koley T, Dewanji A. Revisiting non-parametric maximum likelihood estimation of current status data with competing risks. Sankhya B. 2019;81(1):39–59. doi:10.1007/s13571-018-0172-3
   Google Scholar
• Koley T, Dewanji A. Current status data with two competing risks and missing failure types: time dependent missing probabilities. Available from: https://asu.isical.ac.in/sites/default/files/TechRepASU202004.pdf, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Sukumaran A, Dewan I. Modelling and analysis of recall-based competing risks data. J Appl Stat. 2019;46(9):1621–1635. doi:10.1080/02664763.2018.1561833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav CP, Tomer SK, Panwar MS. A competing risk study of menarcheal age distribution based on non-recall current status data. J Appl Stat. 2022;50(9):1877–1899. doi:10.1080/02664763.2022.2052821
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman L, Gertsbakh IB. Maximum likelihood estimation in a mininum-type model with exponential and Weibull failure modes. J Am Stat Assoc. 1980;75(370):460–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang R, Murthy DNP. Parametric study of competing risk model involving two Weibull distributions. Int J Reliab Qual Saf Eng. 1997;4(01):17–34. doi:10.1142/S0218539397000035
   Google Scholar
• Chan V, Meeker WQ. A failure-time model for infant-mortality and wearout failure modes. IEEE Trans Reliab. 1999;48(4):377–387. doi:10.1109/24.814520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bousquet N, Bertholon H, Celeux G. An alternative competing risk model to the Weibull distribution for modelling aging in lifetime data analysis. Lifetime Data Anal. 2006;12(4):481–504. doi:10.1007/s10985-006-9019-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranjan R, Singh S, Upadhyay SK. A Bayes analysis of a competing risk model based on gamma and exponential failures. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2015;144:35–44. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2015.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranjan R, Upadhyay SK. Classical and Bayesian estimation for the parameters of a competing risk model based on minimum of exponential and gamma failures. IEEE Trans Reliab. 2016;65(3):1522–1535. doi:10.1109/TR.2016.2575439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta A, Ranjan R, Upadhyaya SK. Classical and Bayes analysis of a competing risk model based on two Weibull distributions with increasing and decreasing hazards. Reliab Theory Appl. 2018;13(3 (50)):9–31.
   Google Scholar
• Tan Z. An equivalence based approach to dealing with uncertainty in maximum likelihood estimation. In: IRI-2005 IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration; IEEE; 2005. p. 235–240. Las Vegas, NV, USA, doi:10.1109/IRI-05.2005.1506479
   Google Scholar
• Wang L, Tripathi YM, Lodhi C. Inference for Weibull competing risks model with partially observed failure causes under generalized progressive hybrid censoring. J Comput Appl Math. 2020;368:112537. doi:10.1016/j.cam.2019.112537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo L, Yang TY. Bayesian reliability modeling for masked system lifetime data. Stat Probab Lett. 2000;47(3):229–241. doi:10.1016/S0167-7152(99)00160-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin DB. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodol). 1977;39(1):1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Tan Z. Estimation of exponential component reliability from uncertain life data in series and parallel systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2007;92(2):223–230. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2005.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan T-H, Wang Y-F, Ju S-K. A competing risks model with multiply censored reliability data under multivariate Weibull distributions. IEEE Trans Reliab. 2019;68(2):462–475. doi:10.1109/TR.24
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louis TA. Finding the observed information matrix when using the EM algorithm. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodol). 1982;44(2):226–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dey S, Dey T. Bayesian estimation and prediction intervals for a Rayleigh distribution under a conjugate prior. J Stat Comput Simul. 2012;82(11):1651–1660. doi:10.1080/00949655.2011.590808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen M-H, Shao Q-M. Monte Carlo estimation of Bayesian credible and HPD intervals. J Comput Graph Stat. 1999;8(1):69–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor JS, Risica PM, Cabral HJ. Why primiparous mothers do not breastfeed in the United States: a national survey. Acta Paediatr. 2003;92(11):1308–1313. doi:10.1111/j.1651-2227.2003.tb00501.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar