Chaudhuri and Mukerjee ORRT for two sensitive characteristics and their overlap

References

• Chaudhuri A, Mukerjee R. Optionally randomized response techniques. Bull. Calcutta Statist. Assoc. 1985;34:225–230. doi:10.1177/0008068319850311
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri A, Mukerjee R. Randomized response: theory and techniques. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Lee C-S, Sedory SA, Singh S. Estimating at least seven measures of qualitative variables from a single sample using randomized response technique. Stat Prob Lett. 2013;83(1):399–409. doi:10.1016/j.spl.2012.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee C-S, Sedory SA, Singh S. Estimation of odds ratio, attributable risk, relative risk, correlation coefficient and other parameters using randomized response techniques. Behaviormetrika. 2021;48:371–392. doi:10.1007/s41237-021-00135-x
   Google Scholar
• Warner SL. Randomized response: a survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 1965;60:63–69. doi:10.1080/01621459.1965.10480775
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangat NS. An optional randomized response sampling technique using non- stigmatized attribute. Statistica. 1991;LI:595–602.
   Google Scholar
• Mangat NS, Singh S. Optional randomized response model. J. Indian Stat. Assoc. 1994;32(3):71–75.
   Google Scholar
• Rao TJ, Rao CR. Review of certain recent advances in randomized response techniques. In: A Chaudhuri, TC Christofides, CR Rao, editor. Handbook of statistics, Vol. 34, North-Holland: Elsevier; 2016. p. 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Kim JM, Warde WD. A stratified Warner’s randomized response model. J. Stat. Plann. Inference. 2004;120(1-2):155–165. doi:10.1016/S0378-3758(02)00500-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri A, Saha A. Optional versus compulsory randomized response techniques in complex surveys. J. Stat. Plann. Inference. 2005;135:516–527. doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2004.04.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christofides TC. The classical randomized response techniques. In: A Chaudhuri, TC Christofides, CR Rao, editor. Handbook of statistics, Vol. 34, North-Holland: Elsevier; 2016. p. 29–41.
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri A. Using randomized response from a complex survey to estimate a sensitive proportion in a dichotomous finite population. J Stat Plan Inference. 2001;94:37–42. doi:10.1016/S0378-3758(00)00210-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri A. Special issue: Warner's randomized response model. Model Assist Stat Appl. 2015;10(4):277–281. doi:10.3233/MAS-150331
   Google Scholar
• Adhikary AK. Variance estimation in randomized response surveys. In: A Chaudhuri, TC Christofides, CR Rao, editor. Handbook of statistics, Vol. 34, North- Holland: Elsevier; 2016. p. 191–208.
   Google Scholar
• Bouza-Herrera CN. Behavior of some scrambled randomized response models under simple random sampling, ranked set sampling and Rao-hartley-cochran designs. In: A Chaudhuri, TC Christofides, CR Rao, editor. Handbook of statistics, Vol. 34, North-Holland: Elsevier; 2016. p. 209–220.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Gupta B, Singh S. Estimation of sensitivity level of personal interview survey question. J Stat Plan Inference. 2002;100:239–247. doi:10.1016/S0378-3758(01)00137-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukerjee R. Optional randomized response revisited. In: A Chaudhuri, TC Christofides, CR Rao, editor. Handbook of statistics, Vol. 34, North Holland: Elsevier; 2016. p. 331–340.
   Google Scholar
• Huang KC. Unbiased estimators of mean, variance and sensitivity level for quantitative characteristics in finite population sampling. Metrika. 2010;71:341–352. doi:10.1007/s00184-009-0234-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg BG, Abul-Ela A-LA, Simmons WR, et al. The unrelated question randomized response model: theoretical framework. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 1969;64(326):520–539. doi:10.1080/01621459.1969.10500991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnab R. Optional randomized response techniques for complex survey designs. Biom J. 2004;46(1):114–124. doi:10.1002/bimj.200210006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnab R, Rueda M. Optional randomized response: A critical review. In: A Chaudhuri, TC Christofides, CR Rao, editor. Handbook of statistics, Vol. 34, North-Holland: Elsevier; 2016. p. 253–271.
   Google Scholar
• Arnab R. Optional randomized response techniques for qualitative characteristics. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods. 2019;48(16):4154–4170. doi:10.1080/03610926.2018.1489554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw P. Estimating a finite population proportion bearing a sensitive attribute from a single probability sample by item count technique. In: A Chaudhuri, TC Christofides, CR Rao, editor. Handbook of statistics, Vol. 34, North-Holland: Elsevier; 2016. p. 387–403.
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri A. Randomized response and indirect questioning techniques in surveys. Boca Raton (FL): Chapman and Hall/CRC, Taylor A Francis Group; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Kalucha G, Shabbir J, et al. Estimation of finite population mean using optional RRT models in the presence of non-sensitive auxiliary information. Am. J. Math. Mgmt. Sci. 2014;33:147–159.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Kalucha G, Shabbir J. A regression estimator for finite population mean of a sensitive using an optional randomized response model. Commun. Stat. Simul. Comput. 2017;46:2393–2405. doi:10.1080/03610918.2015.1044614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalucha G, Gupta S, Dass BK. Ratio estimation of finite population mean using optional randomized response models. J. Stat. Theory Pract. 2015;9(3):633–645. doi:10.1080/15598608.2014.977982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh S. On improved strategies in survey sampling. Unpublished Dissertation Submitted to the Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Statistics; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Shah SF, Hussain Z, Cheema SA. Combining answers to direct and indirect questions: An implementation of Kuk’s randomized response model. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods. 2020;49(16):3933–3949. doi:10.1080/03610926.2019.1593458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chhabra A, Dass BK, Mehta S. Multi-stage optional unrelated question RRT model. J. Stat. Theory and Applications. 2016;15(1):80–95. doi:10.2991/jsta.2016.15.1.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox JA. Randomized response and related methods: surveying sensitive data. Los Angeles/Newbury Park (CA): SAGE; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Odumade O, Arnab R, Singh S. Post stratification based on the choice of use of a quantitative randomization device. In: A Chaudhuri, TC Christofides, CR Rao, editor. Handbook of statistics, Vol. 34, North-Holland: Elsevier; 2016. p. 169–189.
   Google Scholar
• Pushadapu K. On optional randomized response techniques in survey sampling. Unpublished thesis submitted for MS in Statistical, Analytics, Computing and Modeling, Department of Mathematics, Texas A&M University-Kingsville, Kingsville, TX; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Pushadapu K, Singh S. Optional randomized response technique for estimating proportions of two sensitive characteristics and their overlap. Presented at the Joint Statistical Meeting 2022, Washington, D.C; 2022.
   Google Scholar