A likelihood-based adaptive CUSUM for monitoring linear drift of Poisson rate with time-varying sample sizes

References

• Suman G, Prajapati D. Control chart applications in healthcare: A literature review. Int J Metrol Qual Eng. 2018;9(5):1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Tsui K-L, Wong SY, Jiang W, et al. Recent research and developments in temporal and spatiotemporal surveillance for public health. IEEE Trans Reliab. 2011;60(1):49–58. doi:10.1109/TR.2010.2104192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeganeh A, Chukhrova N, Johannssen A, et al. A network surveillance approach using machine learning based control charts. Expert Syst Appl. 2023;219(119660):1–17. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.119660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashraf A, Ali S, Shah I. Online disease risk monitoring using DEWMA control chart. Expert Syst Appl. 2021;180(115059):1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisiotis K, Psarakis S, Yannacopoulos AN. Control charts in financial applications: An overview. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2022;38(3):1441–1462. doi:10.1002/qre.2962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu P. Introduction to statistical process control. New York (NY): CRC Press; 2013. Chapter 4, Univariate EWMA Charts; p. 182-191.
   Google Scholar
• Testik MC. Conditional and marginal performance of the Poisson CUSUM control chart with parameter estimation. Int J Prod Res. 2007;45(23):5621–5638. doi:10.1080/00207540701325462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mei Y, Han S W, Tsui K L. Early detection of a change in Poisson rate after accounting for population size effects. Stat Sin. 2011;21(2): 597–624. doi:10.5705/ss.2011.027a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang W, Shu L, Tsui K L. Weighted CUSUM control charts for monitoring Poisson processes with varying sample sizes. J Qual Technol. 2011;43(4):346–362. doi:10.1080/00224065.2011.11917869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Q, Zou C, Wang Z, et al. Likelihood-based EWMA charts for monitoring Poisson count data with time-varying sample sizes. J Am Stat Assoc. 2012;107(499):1049–1062. doi:10.1080/01621459.2012.682811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding D, Li J. Efficient monitoring of overdispersed counts with time-varying population sizes. Comput Ind Eng. 2020;143(106409):1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shu L, Su Y, Jiang W, et al. A comparison of exponentially weighted moving average-based methods for monitoring increases in incidence rate with varying population size. IIE Trans. 2014;46(8):798–812. doi:10.1080/0740817X.2014.894805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Shang Y, Li A D. Self-information-based weighted CUSUM charts for monitoring Poisson count data with varying sample sizes. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2021;37(5):1847–1862. doi:10.1002/qre.2830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen X, Zou C, Jiang W, et al. Monitoring Poisson count data with probability control limits when sample sizes are time varying. Nav Res Logist NRL. 2013;60(8):625–636. doi:10.1002/nav.21557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen X, Tsui K L, Zou C, et al. Self-starting monitoring scheme for Poisson count data with varying population sizes. Technometrics. 2016;58(4):460–471. doi:10.1080/00401706.2015.1075423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chukhrova N, Johannssen A. Hypergeometric p-chart with dynamic probability control limits for monitoring processes with variable sample and population sizes. Comput Ind Eng. 2019;136:681–701. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2019.07.056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aytaçoğlu B, Driscoll A R, Woodall W H. Controlling the conditional false alarm rate for the MEWMA control chart. J Qual Technol. 2022;54(5):487–502. doi:10.1080/00224065.2021.1947162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards SC, Woodall WH, Purdy G. Surveillance of nonhomogeneous Poisson processes. Technometrics. 2015;57(3):388–394. doi:10.1080/00401706.2014.927790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim H, Devesa S S, Sosa J A, et al. Trends in thyroid cancer incidence and mortality in the United States, 1974-2013. Jama. 2017;317(13):1338–1348. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.2719
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He F, Shu L, Tsui K-L. Adaptive CUSUM charts for monitoring linear drifts in Poisson rates. Int J Prod Econ. 2014;148:14–20. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capizzi G, Masarotto G. An adaptive exponentially weighted moving average control chart. Technometrics. 2003;45(3):199–207. doi:10.1198/004017003000000023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riaz M, Zaman B, Raji I A, et al. An adaptive EWMA control chart based on principal component method to monitor process mean vector. Mathematics. 2022;10(12):1–27. doi:10.3390/math10122025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaman B, Mahfooz S Z, Mehmood R, et al. An adaptive EWMA control chart based on Hampel function to monitor the process location parameter. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2023;39(4):1277–1298. doi:10.1002/qre.3291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparks R S. CUSUM charts for signalling varying location shifts. J Qual Technol. 2000;32(2):157–171. doi:10.1080/00224065.2000.11979987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shu L, Jiang W. A Markov chain model for the adaptive CUSUM control chart. J Qual Technol. 2006;38(2):135–147. doi:10.1080/00224065.2006.11918601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang W, Shu L, Apley DW. Adaptive CUSUM procedures with EWMA-based shift estimators. IIE Trans. 2008;40(10):992–1003. doi:10.1080/07408170801961412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaman B. Adaptive CUSUM control charts for efficient monitoring of process dispersion. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2022;38(5):2273–2302. doi:10.1002/qre.3075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaman B, Lee MH, Riaz M, et al. Adaptive memory control charts constructed on generalized likelihood ratio test to monitor process location. Arab J Sci Eng. 2022;47(11):15049–15081. doi:10.1007/s13369-022-06803-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu M, Wu C, Wang Z, et al. A robust CUSUM scheme with a weighted likelihood ratio to monitor an overdispersed counting process. Comput Ind Eng. 2018;126:165–174. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2018.09.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riaz M, Zaman B, Mehmood R, et al. Advanced multivariate cumulative sum control charts based on principal component method with application. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2021;37(6):2760–2789. doi:10.1002/qre.2889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ou Y, Wu Z, Goh T N. A new SPRT chart for monitoring process mean and variance. Int J Prod Econ. 2011;132(2):303–314. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Y I, Tsung F, Wang Z. Dual CUSUM control schemes for detecting a range of mean shifts. IIE Trans. 2005;37(11):1047–1057. doi:10.1080/07408170500232321
   Google Scholar
• Luo Y, Li Z, Wang Z. Adaptive CUSUM control chart with variable sampling intervals. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2009;53(7):2693–2701. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2009.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan AG, Woodall WH. Control charts for Poisson count data with varying sample sizes. J Qual Technol. 2010;42(3):260–275. doi:10.1080/00224065.2010.11917823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar