A comparison of tests for the hypothesis of no three-factor interaction in 2 × 2 × 2 contingency tables

References

• Barlett , M. S. 1935 . Contingency table interaction . J. Royal Statis. Soc. Suppl , 2 : 248 – 252 .
   Google Scholar
• Fienberg , S. E. 1980 . The Analysis of Cross-Classified Categorical Data , Cambridge : MIT Press . 2nd Edition
   Google Scholar
• Goodman , L. A. 1964 . Simple methods for analyzing three-factor interaction in contingency tables . J. Amer. Statist. Ass , 59 : 319 – 352 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grizzle , J. E. , Starmer , C. F. and Koch , G. G. 1969 . Analysis of categorical data by linear models . Biometrics , 25 : 489 – 504 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haber , M. 1985 . A modified exact test for 2×2 contingency tables . Biometrical J , 25 To appear
   Google Scholar
• Hauck , W. W. , Anderson , S. and Leahy , F. J. 1982 . Finite-sample properties of some old and some new estimators of a common odds ratio from multiple 2×2 tables . J. Amer. Statist. Ass , 77 : 145 – 152 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odoroff , C. L. 1970 . A comparison of minimum logit chi-square estimation and maximum likelihood estimation in 2×2×2 and 3×2×2 contingency tables: Tests for interaction . J. Amer. Statist. Ass , 65 : 1617 – 1631 .
   Google Scholar
• Zacks , S. and Solomon , H. 1976 . On testing and estimating the interaction between treatments and environmental conditions in binomial experiments: The case of two stations . Commun. Statist , A5 : 197 – 223 .
   Google Scholar