Evaluation, or Just Data Collection? An Exploration of the Evaluation Practice of Selected UK Environmental Educators

REFERENCES

• American Evaluation Association (AEA). (2004). Guiding principles for evaluators. Retrieved from http://www.eval.org/p/cm/ld/fid=51
   Google Scholar
• Ballantyne, R., Packer, J., & Everett, M. (2005). Measuring environmental education program impacts and learning in the field: Using an action research cycle to develop a tool for use with young students. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 21, 23–38.
   Google Scholar
• Bamberger, M., Rugh, J., Church, M., & Fort, L. (2004). Shoestring evaluation: Designing impact evaluations under budget, time and data constraints. American Journal of Evaluation, 25, 5–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carleton-Hug, A., & Hug, J.W. (2010). Challenges and opportunities for evaluating environmental education programs. Evaluation and Program Planning, 33, 159–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christie, C.A. (2003). What guides evaluation? A study of how evaluation practice maps onto evaluation theory. New Directions for Evaluation, 97, 7–36.
   Google Scholar
• Easton, P.A. (1997). Sharpening our tools. Improving evaluation in adult and nonformal education. Hamburg, Germany: UNESCO Institute for Education and German Foundation for International Development, UIE Studies 4.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, J., & Gregory, T. (2008). Accountability and learning. Developing monitoring and evaluation in the third sector. London, England: Charities Evaluation Service.
   Google Scholar
• Fien, J., Scott, W., & Tilbury, D. (2001). Education and conservation. Lessons from an evaluation. Environmental Education Research, 7, 379–395.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, L.M. (2009). Environmental education professional development needs and priorities study. Tuscon, AZ: Research, Evaluation and Development Services.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, L.M., & Easton, J. (2010). Building environmental educators’ evaluation capacity through distance education. Evaluation and Program Planning, 33,172–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, J.C. (2010). Serving the public good. Evaluation and Program Planning, 33, 197–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, G.T., & Mark, M.M. (2003). Toward an agenda for research on evaluation. New Directions in Evaluation, 97, 69–80.
   Google Scholar
• House, E.R. (2005). Qualitative evaluation and changing social policy. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research ( 3rd ed., Vol. 46, pp. 1069–1081). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, D. (1996). Great ideas revisited. Training & Development, 50(1), 54–60.
   Google Scholar
• Kleiman, D.G., Reading, R.P., Miller, B.J., Clark, T.W., Scott, C.J., Robinson, J., … Felleman, F. (2000). Improving the evaluation of conservation programs. Conservation Biology, 14, 356–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monroe, M.C. (2010). Challenges for environmental education evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 33, 194–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monroe, M.C., Fleming, M.L., Bowman, R.A., Zimmer, J.F.. Marcinkowski, T., Washburn, J., & Mitchell, N.J. (2005). Evaluators as educators: Articulating program theory and building evaluation capacity. New Directions for Evaluation, 108, 57–71.
   Google Scholar
• Norland, E. (2005). The nuances of being “non”: Evaluating nonformal education programs and settings. New Directions for Evaluation, 108, 5–12.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Research Councils UK (RCUK). (2005). Evaluation: Practical guidelines. Swindon, UK: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Rickinson, M. (2001). Learners and learning in environmental education: A critical review of the evidence. Environmental Education Research, 7, 207–320
   Google Scholar
• Rickinson, M., Dillon, J., Teamey, K., Morris, M., Young, M., Choi, M., Sanders, D., & Benefield, P. (2004). A review of research on outdoor learning. London, England: National Foundation for Educational Research and Kings College.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G. (1982). Deciphering sociological research. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan Education.
   Google Scholar
• Shadish, W.R., Cook, T.D., & Leviton, L.C. (1991). Foundations of program evaluation: Theories of practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N.L. (1993). Improving evaluation theory through the empirical study of evaluation practice. American Journal of Evaluation, 14, 237–242.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, B.J., & Couture, J-C. (2009). Introduction. In K.D. Gariepy, B.J. Spencer, & J-C Couture (Eds.), Educational accountability: Professional voices from the field (p. xxi). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Stokking, H., Van Aert, L., Meijberg, W., & Kaskens, A. (1999). Evaluating environmental education. Gland, Switzerland: WCN Commission on Education and Communication.
   Google Scholar
• West, S.E. (2014). Understanding participant and practitioner outcomes of environmental education. Environmental Education Research. doi: 10.1080/13504622.2013.879695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehall, A.K., Hill, L.G., & Koehler, C.R. (2012). A comparison of participant and practitioner beliefs about evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 33, 208–220doi: 10.1177/1098214011423803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zint, M.T. (2012) Advancing environmental education program evaluation: Insights from a review of behavioural outcome evaluations. In R. Stephenson, M. Brody, J. Dillon, & A. Wals (Eds.), International handbook of research in environmental education (pp. 298–309). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zint, M.T., Covitt, B.A., & Dowd, P.F. (2011). Insights from an evaluability assessment of the U.S. Forest Service More Kids in the Woods initiative. The Journal of Environmental Education, 42, 255–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zint, M.T., Dowd, P.F., & Covitt, B.A. (2011). Enhancing environmental educators’ evaluation competencies: Insights from an examination of the effectiveness of the My Environmental Education Evaluation Resource Assistant (MEERA) website. Environmental Education Research, 17, 471–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar