Children's environmental identity and the elementary science classroom

References

• Akkerman, S. F., & Van Eijck, M. (2013). Re-theorising the student dialogically across and between boundaries of multiple communities. British Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 60–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2010). “Doing” science versus “being” a scientist: Examining 10/11-year-old schoolchildren's constructions of science through the lens of identity. Science Education, 94(4), 617–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barron, B. (2006). Interest and self-sustained learning as catalysts of development: A learning ecology perspective. Human Development, 49, 193–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu, S. J., & Calabrese-Barton, A. (2007). Developing a sustained interest in science among urban minority youth. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(3), 466–489. doi:10.1002/tea.20143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blatt, E. N. (2013). Exploring environmental identity and behavioral change in an environmental science course. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 8(2), 467–488.
   Google Scholar
• Bruni, C., Chance, R. & Schultz, P. W. (2012). Measuring values-based environmental concerns in children: An environmental motives scale. The Journal of Environmental Education, 43(1), 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruni, C., & Schultz, P. W. (2010). Implicit beliefs about self and nature: Evidence from an IAT game. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 95–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burriss, K., & Burriss, L. (2011). Outdoor play and learning: Policy and practice. International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 6(8), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Calabrese-Barton, A. (1998). Teaching science with homeless children: Pedagogy, representation, and identity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(4), 379–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabrese-Barton, A., & Yang, K. (2000). The culture of power and science education: Learning from Miguel. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(8), 871–889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrier, S. J., Tugurian, L. P. & Thomson, M. M. (2013). Elementary science indoors and out: Teachers, time, and testing. Research in Science Education, 43(5), 2059–2083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervinka, R., Röderer, K., & Hefler, E. (2012). Are nature lovers happy? On various indicators of well-being and connectedness with nature. Journal of Health Psychology, 17(3), 379–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chawla, L. (2001). Significant life experiences revisited once again: Response to vol. 5(4) Five critical commentaries on significant life experience research in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 7(4), 451–461.
   Google Scholar
• Chawla, L., & Cushing, D. (2007). Education for strategic environmental behavior. Environmental Education Research, 13(4), 437–452.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, J., & Monroe, M. (2012). Connection to nature: Children's affective attitude toward nature. Environment and Behavior, 44(1), 31–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayton, S. (2003). Environmental identity: conceptual and operational definition. In S. Clayton, & S. Opotow (Eds.), Identity and the natural environment: The psychological significance of nature (pp. 45–65). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clayton, S. (2012). Environment and identity. Handbook of environmental and conservation psychology (pp. 164–180). New York, NY: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Clayton, S., & Opotow, S. (Eds.). (2003). Identity and the natural environment: The psychological significance of nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cobern, W. W. (2000). Everyday thoughts about nature: A worldview investigation of important concepts students use to make sense of nature with specific attention to science (Vol. 9). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Cobern, W., Gibson, A., & Underwood, S. (1999). Conceptualizations of nature: An interpretive study of 16 ninth graders' everyday thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(5), 541–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyle, K. J. (2009). Time out: Using the outdoors to enhance classroom performance. Reston, VA: National Wildlife Federation.
   Google Scholar
• DeGuir-Gunby, J. T., Marshall, P. L., & McCulloch, A. W. (2011). Developing and using a codebook for the analysis of interview data: An example from a professional development research project. Field Methods, 23(2), 136–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon, J., Rickinson, M., Teamey, K., Morris, M., Choi, M. Y., Sanders, D., & Benefield, P. (2006). The value of outdoor learning: Evidence from research in the UK and elsewhere. School Science Review, 87(320), 107–111.
   Google Scholar
• Dyment, J. E. (2005). Green school grounds as sites for outdoor learning: Barriers and opportunities. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 14(1), 28–45.
   Google Scholar
• Eberbach, C., & Crowley, K. (2009). From everyday to scientific observation: How children learn to observe the biologist's world. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson, E. H. (1968). Identity, youth, and crisis. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Ernst, J., & Theimer, S. (2011). Evaluating the effects of environmental education programming on connectedness to nature. Environmental Education Research, 17(5), 577–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erstad, O., & Sefton-Green, J. (Eds.). (2013). Identity, community, and learning lives in the digital age. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frantz, C., & Mayer, F. S. (2009). The emergency of climate change: Why are we failing to take action? Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 9(1), 205–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frantz, C. M., & Mayer, F. S. (2014). The importance of connection to nature in assessing environmental education programs. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 41, 85–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, A. (2002). Mutualism: A different agenda for environmental and science education. International Journal of Science Education, 24(11), 1201–1215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2012). Fostering a sense of wonder in the science classroom. Research in Science Education, 42(5), 985–1005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, A., Dopko, R., Passmore, H., & Buro, K. (2011). Nature connectedness: Associations with well-being and mindfulness. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(2), 166–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull, G., & Schultz, K. (2001). Literacy and learning out of school: A review of theory and research. Review of Educational Research, 71(4), 575–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito, M., Gutiérrez, K., Livingstone, S., Penuel, B., Rhodes, J., Salen, K., & Watkins, S. C. (2013). Connected learning: An agenda for research and design. Irvine, CA: Digital Media and Learning Research Hub.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2008). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kals, E., & Ittner, H. (2003). Children's environmental identity, indicators and behavioral impacts (pp. 135–157), Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (2002). Adolescents and the natural environment: A time out. In P. H. Kahn & S. R. Kellert (Eds.), Children and nature. Psychological, sociocultural, and evolutionary investigations (pp. 227–257). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kellert, S. R. (2002). Experiencing nature: Affective, cognitive, and evaluative development in children. Children and nature: Psychological, sociocultural, and evolutionary investigations (pp. 117–151). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kohlstedt, S. G. (2010). Teaching children science: Hands-on nature study in North America, 1890–1930. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kossack, A., & Bogner, F. (2012). How does a one-day environmental education programme support individual connectedness with nature? Journal of Biological Education, 46(3), 180–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumpulainen, K., Krokfors, L., Lipponen, L., Tissari, V., Hilppö, J., & Rajala, A. (2010). Learning bridges: Toward participatory learning environments. Helsinki, Finland: CICERO Learning, University of Helsinki. Retrieved from https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/15631
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J. W., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liefländer, A. K., Fröhlich, G., Bogner, F. X., & Schultz, P. W. (2013). Promoting connectedness with nature through environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 19(3), 370–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindemann-Matthies, P. (2005). Loveable mammals and lifeless plants: How children's interest in common local organisms can be enhanced through observation of nature. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6), 655–677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malone, K. (2008). Every experience matters: An evidence-based research report on the role of learning outside the classroom for children's whole development from birth to eighteen years. Report commissioned by Farming and Countryside Education for UK Department Children, School and Families, Wollongong, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, F. S., & Frantz, C. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals' feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(4), 503–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, F. S., Frantz, C., Bruehlman-Senecal, E., & Dolliver, K. (2009). Why is nature beneficial? The role of connectedness to nature. Environment and Behavior, 41(5), 607–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, M., Kals, E., & Pansa, R. (2009). Adolescents' emotional affinity toward nature: A cross-societal study. Journal of Developmental Processes, 4(1), 59–69.
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nisbet, E., Zelenski, J., & Murphy, S. (2009). The nature relatedness scale: Linking individuals' connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 41(5), 715–740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, J. A., Suggate, J., Robottom, I., & Hart, P. (1999). Significant life experiences and formative influences on the development of adults' environmental awareness in the UK, Australia and Canada. Environmental Education Research, 5(2), 181–200.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, P. (2001). Identity and environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 7(1), 67–88.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, H. E. (2010). Measuring love and care for nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 455–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajala, A., Kumpulainen, K., Hilppö, J., Paananen, M., & Lipponen, L. (2016). Connecting learning across school and out-of-school contexts. In O. Erstad, K. Kumpulainen, Å. Mäkitalo, K. C. Schrøder, P. Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt, & T. Jóhannsdóttir (Eds.), Learning across contexts in the knowledge society (pp. 15–35). The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2003). On assimilating identities to the self: A self-determination theory perspective on internalization and integrity within cultures. In M. R. Leary & M. G. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 253–272). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, C. (2003). The emerging field of conservation psychology. Human Ecology Review, 10(2), 137–149.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, P. W. (2002). Inclusion with nature: The psychology of human-nature relations. In P. Schmuck & W. P. Schultz (Eds.), Psychology of sustainable development (pp. 61–78). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Sobel, D. (2002). Children's special places: Exploring the role of forts, dens, and bush houses in middle childhood. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stets, J., & Biga, C. (2003). Bringing identity theory into environmental sociology. Sociological Theory, 21(4), 398–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tam, K. P. (2013). Concepts and measures related to connection to nature: Similarities and differences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 64–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, S., & Fleming, N. (2004). Examining the evidence: Science achievement in Australian schools in TIMSS 2002 (TIMSS Australian Monograph no. 6). Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, N., & Lekies, K. (2006). Nature and the life course: Pathways from childhood nature experiences to adult environmentalism. Children, Youth and Environments, 16(1), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Willig, C. (2001). Introducing qualitative research in psychology: Adventures in theory and method. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar