891
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Comparing determinants of perceived and actual recycling skills: The role of motivational, behavioral and dispositional factors

&

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.
  • Andersson, M., & von Borgstede, C. (2010). Differentiation of determinants of low-cost and high-cost recycling. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 402–408.
  • Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 14–25.
  • Bandura, A. (1977). “Self-Efficacy”: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.
  • Baxter, P., & Norman, G. (2011). Self-assessment or self-deception? A lack of association between nursing students' self-assessment and performance. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 67, 2406–2413.
  • Best, H., & Kneip, T. (2011). The impact of attitudes and behavioral costs on environmental behavior: A natural experiment on household waste recycling. Social Science Research, 40, 917–930.
  • Bollen, K. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Carrus, G., Bonnes, M., Fornara, F., Passafaro, P., & Tronu, G. (2009). Planned behavior and “local” norms: An analysis of the place-based aspects of normative ecological behavior. Cognitive Processing, 10, 198–200.
  • Choi, J. A., Koo, M., Choi, I., & Auh, S. (2008). Need for cognitive closure and information search strategy. Psychology & Marketing, 25, 1027–1042.
  • Diekmann, A., & Preisendörfer, P. (2003). Green and greenback: The behavioural effects of environmental attitudes in low-cost and high-cost situations. Rationality and Society, 15, 441–472.
  • Ehrlinger, J., & Dunning, D. (2003). How chronic self-views influence (and potentially mislead) estimates of performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 5–17.
  • Fay, A. J., Jordan, A. H., & Ehrlinger, J. (2012). How social norms promote misleading social feedback and inaccurate self-assessment. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6, 206–216.
  • Fornara, F., Carrus, G., Passafaro, P., & Bonnes, M. (2011). Distinguishing the sources of normative influence on proenvironmental behaviors: The role of local norms in household waste recycling. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 5, 623–635.
  • Gordon, M. (1991). A review of the validity and accuracy of self-assessments in health professions training. Academic Medicine, 66, 762–769.
  • Hargittai, E., & Shafer, S. (2006). Differences in actual and perceived online skills: The role of gender. Social Science Quarterly, 87, 432–448.
  • Hodges, B., Regehr, G., & Martin, D. (2001). Difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence: Novice physicians who are unskilled and unaware of it. Academic Medicine, 76, S87–S89.
  • Kaiser, F. G., & Fuhrer, U. (2003). Ecological behavior's dependency on different forms of knowledge. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 52, 598–613.
  • Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1121–1134.
  • Kruglanski, A. W. (2004). The psychology of closed-mindedness. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  • Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 408–498.
  • Livi, S., Kruglanski, A. W., Pierro, A., Mannetti, L., & Kenny, D. A. (2015). Epistemic motivation and perpetuation of group culture: Effects of need for cognitive closure on trans- generational norm transmission. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 129, 105–112.
  • Livi, S., Pierro, A., Rullo, M., & Kruglanski, A. (2015). Motivational underpinnings of intergenerational transmission: The role of need for cognitive closure on salience of perceived norms. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46(10), 1356–1360.
  • Mannetti, L., Pierro, A., & Livi, S. (2004). Recycling: Planned and self-expressive behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(2), 227–236.
  • Mayseless, O., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1987). What makes you so sure? Effects of epistemic motivations on judgmental confidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, 162–183.
  • Passafaro, P., Bacciu, A., Caggianelli, I., Castaldi, V., Fucci, E., Ritondale, D., & Trabalzini, E. (2016). Measuring individual skills in household waste recycling: Implications for citizens' education and communication in six urban contexts. Applied Environmental Education and Communication, 15, 234–246. doi:10.1080/1533015X.2016.1181016
  • Pierro, A., Sheveland, A., Livi, S., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2015). Person-group fit on the need for cognitive closure as a predictor of job performance, and the mediating role of group identification. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 19(2), 77.
  • Ramsey, C. E., & Rickson, R. E. (1976). Environmental knowledge and attitudes. The Journal of Environmental Education, 8, 10–18.
  • Rickinson, M. (2001). Learners and learning in environmental education: A critical review of the evidence. Environmental Education Research, 7, 207–320.
  • Roets, A., Kruglanski, A. W., Kossowska, M., Pierro, A., & Hong, Y. Y. (2015). The motivated gatekeeper of our minds: New directions in need for closure theory and research. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 52, 221–283.
  • Seacat, J. D., & Northrup, D. (2010). An information-motivation-behavioral skills assessment of curbside recycling behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 393–401.
  • Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behavior: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 309–317.
  • Sundström, A. (2011). The validity of self-reported driver competence: Relations between measures of perceived driver competence and actual driving skill. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 14, 155–163.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.