891
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Organize or die: Farm school pedagogy and the political ecology of the agroecological transition in rural Haiti

References

  • Adams, W. M. (2009). Green development: Environment and sustainability in a developing world (3rd ed.). London, England: Routledge.
  • Alaimo, S. (2010). Bodily natures: Science, environment, and the material self. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
  • Altieri, M. A., & Toledo, V. M. (2011). The agroecological revolution in Latin America: Rescuing nature, ensuring food sovereignty and empowering peasants. Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(3), 587–612.
  • Barton, A. C. (2001). Science education in urban settings: Seeking new ways of praxis through critical ethnography. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 899–917.
  • Bessire, L., & Bond, D. (2014). Ontological anthropology and the deferral of critique. American Ethnologist, 41(3), 440–456.
  • Braun, B., Whatmore, S. J., & Stengers, I. (2010). Political matter: Technoscience, democracy, and public life. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Dei, G. S. (2012). Indigenous anti-colonial knowledge as “heritage knowledge” for promoting Black/African education in diasporic contexts. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1(1), 102–119.
  • De la Cadena, M. (2010). Indigenous cosmopolitics in the Andes: Conceptual reflections beyond “Politics.” Cultural Anthropology, 25(2), 334–370.
  • De Molina, M. G. (2013). Agroecology and politics. How to get sustainability? About the necessity for a political agroecology. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 37(1), 45–59.
  • Desmarais, A. (2008). Peasant resistance to neoliberalism: La via campesina and food sovereignty. Human Geography, 1(1), 1–7.
  • Desmarais, A. A. (2007). La via campesina: Globalization and the power of peasants. Black Point, Canada: Fernwood.
  • Engel-Di Mauro, S., & Carroll, K. K. (2014). An African-centred approach to land education. Environmental Education Research, 20(1), 70–81.
  • Fien, J. (1993). Education for the environment: Critical curriculum theorising and environmental education. Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press.
  • Freire, P. (1973). Education for critical consciousness. New York, NY: Continuum.
  • Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum.
  • Gaztambide-Fernández, R. A. (2012). Decolonization and the pedagogy of solidarity. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1(1), 41–67.
  • Glass, R. D. (2001). On Paulo Freire's philosophy of praxis and the foundations of liberation education. Educational Researcher, 30(2), 15–25.
  • Greenwood, D. A. (2013). A critical theory of place-conscious education. In R. B. Stevenson, M. Brody, J. Dillon, & A. E. J. Wals (Eds.), International Handbook on Environmental Education Research (pp. 93–100). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Grosz, E. A. (1994). Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
  • Gruenewald, D. A. (2003). The best of both worlds: A critical pedagogy of place. Educational Researcher, 32(4), 3–12.
  • Harding, S. G. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge?: Thinking from women's lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Harding, S. (2009). Postcolonial and feminist philosophies of science and technology: Convergences and dissonances. Postcolonial Studies, 12(4), 401–421.
  • Hart, G. (2006). Denaturalizing dispossession: Critical ethnography in the age of resurgent imperialism. Antipode, 38(5), 977–1004.
  • Hart, P. (2008). Ontological/epistemological pluralism within complex contested EE/ESD landscapes: Beyond politics and mirrors. In E. Gonzalez-Gaudiano & M. A. Peters (Eds.), Environmental education: Identity, politics and citizenship (pp. 25–38). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
  • Harvey, D. (1996). Justice, nature and the geography of difference. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Herbert, S. (2000). For ethnography. Progress in Human Geography, 24(4), 550–568.
  • Holt-Giménez, E. (2006). Movimiento de campesino a campesino: Linking sustainable agriculture and social change. Backgrounder, 12(1), 1–4.
  • Howe, K. (1993). Haitian creole as the official language in education and the media. In F. Byrne & J. A. Holm (Eds.), Atlantic meets Pacific: A global view of pidginization and creolization (pp. 291–298). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamin Publishing.
  • Hursh, D., Henderson, J., & Greenwood, D. (2015). Environmental education in a neoliberal climate. Environmental Education Research, 21(3), 299–318.
  • Irlbacher-Fox, S. (2014). Traditional knowledge, co-existence and co-resistance. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 3(3), 145–158.
  • Issa, D. (2007). Praxis of empowerment: Mística and mobilization in Brazil's Landless Rural Workers' Movement. Latin American Perspectives, 34(2), 124–138.
  • Kahn, R. (2010). Critical pedagogy, ecoliteracy, & planetary crisis: The ecopedagogy movement. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  • Kopnina, H. (2014). Future scenarios and environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 45(4), 217–231.
  • Lieblein, G., Østergaard, E., & Francis, C. (2004). Becoming an agroecologist through action education. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 2(3), 147–153.
  • Lotz-Sisitka, H., Fien, J., Ketlhoilwe, M. (2013). Traditions and new niches. In M. Brody & R. B. Stevenson (Eds.), International handbook of research in environmental education (pp. 194–205). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Martinez-Torres, M. E., & Rosset, P. M. (2014). Diálogo de saberes in la vía campesina: Food sovereignty and agroecology. Journal of Peasant Studies, 41(6), 979–997.
  • McClintock, N. (2004). Regenerative agriculture for Haiti's central plateau: A sustainable foundation for food and nutrition security. Paris, France: Zanmi Lasante.
  • McCune, N., Reardon, J., & Rosset, P. (2014). Agroecological formación in rural social movements. Radical Teacher, 98, 31–37.
  • McKenzie, M. (2012). Education for y'all: Global neoliberalism and the case for a politics of scale in sustainability education policy. Policy Futures in Education, 10(2), 165.
  • McNee, M. K. (2002). Performances and pedagogies of landlessness in theater and the plastic arts. The sights and voices of dispossession: The Fight for the land and the emerging culture of the MST. Retrieved from http://www.landless-voices.org/vieira/
  • Meek, D. (2015a). Learning as territoriality: The political ecology of education in the Brazilian Landless Workers' Movement. Journal of Peasant Studies, 42(6), 1179–1200.
  • Meek, D. (2015b). The cultural politics of the agroecological transition. Agriculture and Human Values, 33, 1–16.
  • Meek, D. (2015c). Towards a political ecology of education: The educational politics of scale in southern Pará, Brazil. Environmental Education Research, 21(3), 447–459.
  • Mintz, S. W. (1984). From plantations to peasantries in the Caribbean. Washington, DC: Latin American Program, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.
  • MPP. (1998). Mouvman Peyizan Papay (MPP): Bilan 25 an 1973–1998. Port-au-Prince, Haiti: L'Imprimeur II.
  • Pamphile, L. D. (1985). America's policy-making in Haitian education, 1915–1934. The Journal of Negro Education, 54(1), 99–108.
  • Pavlova, M. (2011). Environmental education and/or education for sustainable development: What role for technology education? London, England: Goldsmiths University of London. Retrieved from http://www98.griffith.edu.au/dspace/browse?value=Pavlova%2C+Margarita+B.&type=author
  • Payne, P. (1995). Ontology and the critical discourse of environmental education. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 11, 83–105.
  • Payne, P. (1997). Embodiment and environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 3(2), 133–153.
  • Payne, P. (1999a). The significance of experience in SLE research. Environmental Education Research, 5(4), 365–381.
  • Payne, P. (1999b). Postmodern challenges and modern horizons: Education “for being for the environment.” Environmental Education Research, 5(1), 5–34.
  • Payne, P. (2001). Identity and environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 7(1), 67–88.
  • Phillips, K. D., & Roberts, D. (2011). Cultivating schools for rural development: Labor, learning, and the challenge of food sovereignty in Tanzania. In S. A. Robert & M. B. Weaver-Hightower (Eds.), School food politics: The complex ecology of hunger and feeding in schools around the world. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  • Robottom, I. M. (1991). Technocratic environmental education: A critique and some alternatives. Journal of Experiential Education, 14(1), 20–26.
  • Robottom, I. M., & Hart, E. P. (1993). Research in environmental education: Engaging the debate. Geelong, Australia: Deakin University.
  • Rosset, P. M., Machin Sosa, B., Roque Jaime, A. M., & Ávila Lozano, D. R. (2011). The campesino-to-campesino agroecology movement of ANAP in Cuba: Social process methodology in the construction of sustainable peasant agriculture and food sovereignty. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(1), 161–191.
  • Rosset, P. M., & Martínez-Torres, M. E. (2012). Rural social movements and agroecology: Context, theory, and process. Ecology and Society, 17(3), 17.
  • Shamsie, Y. (2012). Haiti's post-earthquake transformation: What of agriculture and rural development? Latin American Politics and Society, 54(2), 133–152.
  • Simpson, L. B. (2014). Land as pedagogy: Nishnaabeg intelligence and rebellious transformation. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 3(3), 1–25.
  • Smith, J. M. (2001). When the hands are many: Community organization and social change in rural Haiti. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Smith, N. (2008). Uneven development: Nature, capital, and the production of space (3rd ed.). Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
  • Trouillot, M.-R. (1990). Haiti, state against nation: The origins and legacy of Duvalierism. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.
  • Tuck, E., McKenzie, M., & McCoy, K. (2014). Land education: Indigenous, post-colonial, and decolonizing perspectives on place and environmental education research. Environmental Education Research, 20(1), 1–23.
  • Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2012). Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1(1), 1–40.
  • Warner, K. D. (2008). Agroecology as participatory science: Emerging alternatives to technology transfer extension practice. Science, Technology & Human Values, 33(6), 754–777.
  • Wezel, A., Bellon, S., Doré, T., Francis, C., Vallod, D., & David, C. (2011). Agroecology as a science, a movement and a practice. In Sustainable Agriculture (Vol. 2, pp. 27–43). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Wildcat, M., McDonald, M., Irlbacher-Fox, S., & Coulthard, G. (2014). Learning from the land: Indigenous land based pedagogy and decolonization. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 3(3), I–XV.
  • Woodhouse, J. L., & Knapp, C. E. (2000). Place-based curriculum and instruction: Outdoor and environmental education approaches. ERIC Digest. In ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools. Charleston, WV: ERIC. Retrieved from https://www.ericdigests.org/2001-3/place.htm

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.