Integrating multiple perspectives on the human-nature relationship: A reply to Fletcher 2017

References

• Argyrou, V. (2005). The logic of environmentalism: Anthropology, ecology, and postcoloniality. New York: Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• Ashmore, R. D., Deaux, K., & McLaughlin-Volpe, T. (2004). An organizing framework for collective identity: Articulation and significance of multidimensionality. Psychological Bulletin, 130(1), 80–114. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.1.80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashwell, A. N. (2010). Identity and belonging: urban nature and adolescent development in the City of Cape Town. PhD dissertation. University of Cape Town, Cape Town.
   Google Scholar
• Bekoff, M. (2014). Rewilding Our Hearts: Building Pathways of Compassion and Coexistence. Novato: New World Library.
   Google Scholar
• Bragg, E. (1996). Towards ecological self: deep ecology meets constructionist self- theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16(2), 93–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bragg, R., Wood, C., Barton, J., & Pretty, J. (2013). Measuring connection to nature in children aged 8 -12: A robust methodology for the RSPB A short report for RSPB.
   Google Scholar
• Bratman, G., Daily, G., Levy, B., & Gross, J. (2015). The benefits of nature experience: improved affect and cognition. Landsc Urban Plan, 138, 41–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castree, N & Head, L. (2008). Culture, nature and landscape in the Australian region. Geoforum, 39(3), 1225–1257. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.10.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleary, A., Fielding, K. S., Bell, S. L., Murray, Z., & Roiko, A. (2017). Exploring potential mechanisms involved in the relationship between eudaimonic well-being and nature connection. Landscape and Urban Planning, 158, 119–128. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronon, W. (1996). Forward to the paperback edition. In W. Cronon, (Ed.), Uncommon ground: Rethinking the human place in nature (pp. 19–22). New York: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Dickinson, E. (2013). The misdiagnosis: Rethinking “Nature-deficit Disorder.” Environmental Communication, 7(3), 315–335. doi:10.1080/17524032.2013.802704
   Google Scholar
• Esbjörn-Hargens, S., & Zimmerman, M. E. (2009). Integral Ecology: Uniting multiple perspectives on the natural world. Boston & London: Integral Books (Shambhala Publications).
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, R. (2017). Connection with nature is an oxymoron: A political ecology of “nature-deficit disorder.” The Journal of Environmental Education, 48(4), 226–233. doi:10.1080/00958964.2016.1139534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frantz, C. M. P., & Mayer, F. S. (2014). The importance of connection to nature in assessing environmental education programs. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 41, 85–89. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenway, R. (2011). Can a bigger map save us? A commentary on Esbjörn-Hargens and Michael Zimmerman’s Integral ecology: Uniting multiple perspectives on the natural world. Ecopsychology, 3(2), 159–163. doi:10.1089/eco.2010.0045
   Google Scholar
• Gruenewald, D. A. (2003). The best of both worlds: A critical pedagogy of place. Educational Researcher, 32(4), 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Gruenewald, D. A. (2005). Accountability and collaboration: Institutional barriers and strategic pathways for place-based education. Ethics, Place & Environment, 8(3), 261–283.
   Google Scholar
• Hartig, T., Mitchell, R., de Vries, S., & Frumkin, H. (2014). Nature and health. Annual Review of Public Health, 35(1), 207–228. doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ives, C., Giusti, M., Fischer, J., Abson, D., Klaniecki, K., Dorninger, C., … von Wehrden, H. (2017). Human–nature connection: a multidisciplinary review. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26-27, 106–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kals, E., Schumacher, D., & Montada, L. (1999). Emotional affinity toward nature as a motivational basis to protect nature. Environment and Behavior, 31(2), 178–202. doi:10.1177/00139169921972056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people behave environmentally and what are the barriers to pro. Environmental Behaviour. Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260. doi:10.1080/1350462022014540
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2004). Politics of nature: How to bring the sciences into democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mattson, M. (2009). Neglected interiors: A critique of political ecology, with reference to the work of Ken Wilber. South African Journal of Environmental Education, 26, 221–231.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, F. S., & Frantz, C. M. P. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(4), 503–515. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon, A., & Karthik, M. (2017). Beyond human exceptionalism: Political ecology and the non-human world. Geoforum, 79, 90–92. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.12.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2009). The nature relatedness scale. Environment and Behavior, 41(5), 715–740. doi:10.1177/0013916508318748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, P. G. (2016). What next? Post-critical materialisms in environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 47(2), 169–178. doi:10.1080/00958964.2015.1127201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Restall, B., & Conrad, E. (2015). A literature review of connectedness to nature and its potential for environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 159, 264–278. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.05.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, P. W. (2011). Conservation means behavior. Conservation Biology, doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01766.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sewall, L. (1999). Sight and Sensibility: The Ecopsychology of Perception. New York: Tarcher/Putnam. 25(6), 1080–1083.
   Google Scholar
• Soga, M., & Gaston, K. (2016). Extinction of experience: the loss of human–nature interactions. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14(2), 94–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinoza, B. (2001). Ethics. (W. H. White, Trans.). Wordsworth: Hertfordshire
   Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, K., & Kasturirangan, R. (2016). Political ecology, development, and human exceptionalism. Geoforum, 75, 125–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tam, K. P. (2013). Concepts and measures related to connection to nature: Similarities and differences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 64–78. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vining, J., Merrick, M. S., & Price, E. A. (2008). The distinction between humans and nature: Human perceptions of connectedness to nature and elements of the natural and unnatural. Human Ecology Review, 15(1), 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilber, K. (1995). Sex, ecology, spirituality: The spirit of evolution. Boston: Shambhala.
   Google Scholar
• Wilber, K. (2000). Integral Psychology: Consciousness, Spirit, Psychology, Therapy. London: Shambhala.
   Google Scholar
• Zylstra, M. J. (2014). Exploring meaningful nature experience, connectedness with nature, and the revitalization of transformative education for sustaibability. PhD dissertation, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch. http://scholar.sun.ac.za/handle/10019.1/86290
   Google Scholar
• Zylstra, M. J., Knight, A. T., Esler, K. J., & Le Grange, L. L. L. (2014). Connectedness as a core conservation concern: An interdisciplinary review of theory and a call for practice. Springer Science Reviews, 2(1–2), 119–143. doi:10.1007/s40362-014-0021-3
   Google Scholar