Is this what good pedagogy looks like? Review essay of Diverse pedagogies of place: Educating students in and for local and global environments, edited by Peter Renshaw and Ron Tooth

References

• Anagnostopoulos, D., Lingard, B., & Sellar, S. (2016). Argumentation in educational policy disputes: Competing visions of quality and equity. Theory into Practice, 55(4), 342–351. doi:10.1080/00405841.2016.1208071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (n.d). Australian curriculum. Retrieved from https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2012). Australian teacher performance and development framework. Carlton South: Education Services Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2009). Good education in an age of measurement: On the need to reconnect with the question of purpose in education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 33–46. doi:10.1007/s11092-008-9064-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2010). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. London: Paradigm.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2015). What is education for? On good education, teacher judgement, and educational professionalism. European Journal of Education, 50(1), 75–87. doi:10.1111/ejed.12109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2017). Education, measurement and the professions: Reclaiming a space for democratic professionality in education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 4(49), 315–330. doi:10.1080/00131857.2015.1048665
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2015). The role of beliefs in teacher agency. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 624–640. doi:10.1080/13540602.2015.1044325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christie, B. A., Miller, K. K., Cooke, R., & White, J. G. (2013). Environmental sustainability in higher education: How do academics teach? Environmental Education Research, 19(3), 385–414. doi:10.1080/13504622.2012.698598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coe, R., Aloisi, C., Higgins, S., & Major, L. E. (2014). What makes great teaching? Review of the underpinning research (Project Report). London: Sutton Trust. Retrieved from http://dro.dur.ac.uk/13747/
   Google Scholar
• Crocco, M. S., & Costigan, A. T. (2007). The narrowing of curriculum and pedagogy in the age of accountability: Urban educators speak out. Urban Education, 42(6), 512–535. doi:10.1177/0042085907304964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Education. (2019). Every student succeeding – state schools strategy (2019-2023). Retrieved from https://education.qld.gov.au/initiatives-and-strategies/strategies-and-programs/state-schools-strategy/
   Google Scholar
• Dickinson, E. (2016). Ecocultural conversations: Bridging the human-nature divide through connective communication practices. Southern Communication Journal, 81(1), 32–48. doi:10.1080/1041794X.2015.1065289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditchburn, G. (2012). A national Australian curriculum: In whose interests? Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 32(3), 259–269. doi:10.1080/02188791.2012.711243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Education Endowment Foundation. (2019). The big picture. Retrieved from https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/
   Google Scholar
• Evidence for Learning. (2019). Helping great practice become common practice in education. Retrieved from https://evidenceforlearning.org.au/
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, D. A. (2013). A critical theory of place-conscious education. In R. B. Stevenson, M. Brody, J. Dillon & A. E. J. Wals (Eds.), International handbook of research on environmental education (pp. 93–100). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Groundwater-Smith, S., Ewing, R., & Le Cornu, R. (2015). Teaching challenges and dilemmas (5th ed.). Melbourne: Cengage Learning Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Gruenewald, D. A. (2003). The best of both worlds: A critical pedagogy of place. Educational Researcher, 32(4), 3–12. doi:10.3102/0013189X032004003
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analysis relating to achievement. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Loughran, J. (2006). Developing a pedagogy of teacher education: Understanding teaching and learning about teaching. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mannion, G., Fenwick, A., & Lynch, J. (2013). Place-responsive pedagogy: Learning from teachers’ experiences of excursions in nature. Environmental Education Research, 19(6), 792–809. doi:10.1080/13504622.2012.749980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marzano, R. J. (2017). The new art and science of teaching. Bloomington: Solution Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning to think like an adult. Core concepts of transformation theory. In J. Mezirow & Associates (Eds.), Learning as transformation. Critical perspectives on a theory in progress (pp. 3–34). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Mezirow, J. (2009). Transformative learning theory. In J. Mezirow & E. W. Taylor (Eds.), Transformative learning in practice (pp. 18–32). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs. (2008). The Melbourne declaration. Retrieved from https://apo.org.au/node/83104
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, T. (2002). Can the mosquito speak? In T. Mitchell (Ed.), Rule of experts: Egypt, techno-politics, modernity (pp. 19–53). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2017, November 8). Simplistic advice for teachers on how to teach won’t work. The Conversation. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/simplistic-advice-for-teachers-on-how-to-teach-wont-work-86706
   Google Scholar
• Queensland Government, Department of Education. (2019). P-12 curriculum, assessment and reporting framework. Retrieved from https://education.qld.gov.au/curriculum/school-curriculum/p-12
   Google Scholar
• Queensland Government, Department of Education. (2018). Outdoor and environmental education centres. Retrieved from https://education.qld.gov.au/schools-educators/other-education/OEEC
   Google Scholar
• Rickinson, M. (2001). Learners and learning in environmental education: A critical review of the evidence. Environmental Education Research, 7(3), 207–320. doi:10.1080/13504620120065230
   Google Scholar
• Scott, C. L. (2015). The futures of learning 3: What kind of pedagogies for the 21st century? (ERF Working Papers Series, No. 15). Paris: UNESCO Education Research and Foresight.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G. A., & Sobel, D. (2010). Place- and community-based education in schools. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Somerville, M. (2010). A place pedagogy for ‘global contemporaneity. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 42(3), 326–334. doi:10.1111/j.1469-5812.2008.00423.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterling, S. (2010-11). Transformative learning and sustainability: Sketching the conceptual ground. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 5(11), 17–33.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, R. B., Brody, M., Dillon, J., & Wals, A. E. J. (Eds.). (2013). International handbook of research on environmental education. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (n.d.). Effective and appropriate pedagogy. Retrieved from https://learningportal.iiep.unesco.org/en/issue-briefs/improve-learning/teachers-and-pedagogy/effective-and-appropriate-pedagogy
   Google Scholar
• Van Manen, M. (1994). Pedagogy, virtue, and narrative identity in teaching. Curriculum Inquiry, 24(2), 135–170. doi:10.1080/03626784.1994.11076157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wattchow, B., & Brown, M. (2011). A pedagogy of place: Outdoor education for a changing world. Melbourne: Monash University Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Yates, L. (2018). The curriculum conversation in Australia: Review essay of the Australian Curriculum: Promises, problems and possibilities. Curriculum Perspectives, 38(2), 137–144. doi:10.1007/s41297-018-0057-7
   Google Scholar