Down-to-earth ecological literacy through human and nonhuman encounters in fieldwork

References

• Barthel, S., Belton, S., Raymond, C. M., & Giusti, M. (2018). Fostering children’s connection to nature through authentic situations: The Case of Saving Salamanders at School. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 928. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00928
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, A. (1997). Natural history from a learner’s perspective. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 2(1), 132–144.
   Google Scholar
• Bonnett, M. (2007). Environmental education and the issue of nature. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 39(6), 707–721. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270701447149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, G. M., & Roth, W.-M. (2007). The practice of field ecology: Insights for science education. Research in Science Education, 37(2), 171–187. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9021-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capra, F. (1997). The Web of Life: A New Scientific Understanding of Living Systems. Anchor books.
   Google Scholar
• Carlone, H. B., Benavides, A., Huffling, L. D., Matthews, C. E., Journell, W., & Tomasek, T. (2016). Field ecology: A modest, but imaginable, contestation of neoliberal science education. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 23(3), 199–211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2016.1194433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlone, H. B., Huffling, L. D., Tomasek, T., Hegedus, T. A., Matthews, C. E., Allen, M. H., & Ash, M. C. (2015). Unthinkeble’ selves: Identity boundary work in a summer field ecology enrichment program for diverse youth. International Journal of Science Education, 37(10), 1524–1546. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1033776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, R. (1962). Silent Spring. Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Dampc, A., & Luczkiewicz, M. (2013). Rhododendron tomentosum (Ledum palustre): A review of traditional use based on current research. Fitoterapia, 85, 130–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Despret, V. (2004). The Body We Care For: Figures of Anthropo-zoo-genesis. Body & Society, 10(2-3), 111–134. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X04042938
   Google Scholar
• Despret, V. (2013). From secret agents to interagency. History and Theory, 52(4), 29–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.10686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Despret, V. (2016). What would animals say if we asked the right questions? University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon, J., Rickinson, M., Teamey, K., Morris, M., Choi, M. Y., Sanders, D., & Benefield, P. (2006). The value of outdoor learning: Evidence from research in the UK and elsewhere. School Science Review, 87(320), 107–110.
   Google Scholar
• Furtak, E. M., & Stroupe, D. (2020). A deficit in shared practice: Reflections on Latour’s “down to earth.” Science Education, 104(1), 100–107. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gannon, S. (2017). Saving squawk? Animal and human entanglement at the edge of the lagoon. Environmental Education Research, 23(1), 91–110. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2015.1101752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleason, T. (2019). Towards a terrestrial education: A commentary on Bruno Latour’s down to earth. Environmental Education Research, 25(6), 977–986. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2019.1649369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunnarsson, K., & Bodén, L. (2021). Introduktion till postkvalitativ metodologi. Stockholm University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Häggström, M. (2020). Aesthetical experiences in direct nature meetings. A phenomenological study on experiences of forest, plants and education [dissertation]. Gothenburg University.
   Google Scholar
• Hammarsten, M., Askerlund, P., Almers, E., Avery, H., & Samuelsson, T. (2019). Developing ecological literacy in a forest garden: Children’s perspectives. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 19(3), 227–241. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2018.1517371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. (2008). When species meet. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the chthulucene. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hardahl, L. K., Wickman, P.-O., & Caiman, C. (2019). The body and the production of phenomena in the science laboratory. Science & Education, 28(8), 865–895. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00063-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harman, G. (2009). Prince of networks: Bruno Latour and metaphysics. re. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, C. W. (1989). Husserl’s phenomenology and the foundations of natural science. Ohio University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hasse, C. (2020). Posthumanist learning: What robots and cyborgs teach us about being ultra-social. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobson, B., & Wickman, P.-O. (2008). The roles of aesthetic experience in elementary school science. Research in Science Education, 38(1), 45–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9039-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopnina, H. (2017). Beyond multispecies ethnography: Engaging with violence and animal rights in anthropology. Critique of Anthropology, 37(3), 333–357. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X17723973
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2004). Politics of nature: How to bring the sciences into democracy. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2018). Down to earth: Politics in the new climatic regime. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lloro-Bidart, T. (2018). A feminist posthumanist multispecies ethnography for educational studies. Educational Studies, 54(3), 253–270. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2017.1413370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, J., & Mannion, G. (2021). Place-responsive pedagogies in the anthropocene: Attuning with the more-than-human. Environmental Education Research, 27(6), 864–878. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1867710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magntorn, O. (2007). Reading nature: Developing ecological literacy through teaching [dissertation]. Linköping University.
   Google Scholar
• Malone, K. (2016). Reconsidering children’s encounters with nature and place using posthumanism. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 32(1), 42–56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2015.48
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannion, G., Fenwick, A., & Lynch, J. (2013). Place-responsive pedagogy: Learning from teachers’ experiences of excursions in nature. Environmental Education Research, 19(6), 792–809. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2012.749980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McBride, B. B., Brewer, C. A., Berkowitz, A. R., & Borrie, W. T. (2013). Environmental literacy, ecological literacy, ecoliteracy: What do we mean and how did we get here? Ecosphere, 4(5), 1–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1890/ES13-00075.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, N. (2015). Conversations on plant sensing: Notes from the field. NatureCulture, 3, 35–66.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, L. A., Hall, B., & Tanita, K. (2013). Animals, plants, people, and things: A review of multispecies ethnography. Environment and Society, 4(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3167/ares.2013.040102
   Google Scholar
• Orr, W. D. (1992). Ecological Literacy: Education and the transition to a postmodern world. State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Østergaard, E., Dahlin, B., & Hugo, A. (2008). Doing phenomenology in science education: A research review. Studies in Science Education, 44(2), 93–121. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260802264081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacini-Ketchabaw, V., Taylor, A., & Blaise, M. (2016). Decentering the human in multispecies ethnographies. In C. Taylor & C. Hughes (Eds.), Posthuman research practices (pp. 149–167). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, P. G. (2020). “Amnesia of the moment” in environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 51(2), 113–143. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2020.1726263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, C. (2017). History and Animal Agencies. In L. Kalof (Ed.), The oxford handbook of animal studies. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, H. (2015). Education policy making for social change: A posthumanist intervention. In N. Snaza & J. A. Weaver (Eds.), Posthumanism and educational research (pp. 56–74). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, A. (2005). Asian eels and global warming: A posthumanist perspective on society and the environment. Ethics & the Environment, 10(2), 29–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2979/ETE.2005.10.2.29
   Google Scholar
• Roth, C. E. (1968). Curriculum Overview for Developing Environmentally Literate Citizens. Liberty Council of Schools, Conservation Education Center.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M. (2004). Emergence of graphing practices in scientific research. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 4(3–4), 595–627. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/1568537042484940
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M. (2008). Knowing, participative thinking. Emoting. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 15(1), 2–7.
   Google Scholar
• Rousell, D. (2021). Cosmopolitical encounters in environmental education: Becoming-ecological in the intertidal zones of Bundjalung national park. The Journal of Environmental Education, 52(2), 133–148. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2020.1863313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandell, K., & Öhman, J. (2010). Educational potentials of encounters with nature: Reflections from a Swedish outdoor perspective. Environmental Education Research, 16(1), 113–132. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620903504065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandell, K., & Sörlin, S. (2008). Friluftshistoria–från ‘härdande friluftslif’ till ekoturism och miljöpedagogik: Teman i de svenska friluftslivets historia. Carlsons bokförlag.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, G. W., Boyd, M., Scott, L., & Colquhoun, D. (2015). Barriers to biological fieldwork: What really prevents teaching out of doors? Journal of Biological Education, 49(2), 165–178. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2014.914556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snaza, N. (2013). Bewildering education. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 10(1), 38–54. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15505170.2013.783889
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Research Council (2017). Good Research Practice. Swedish Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• The Ethics Review Act (SFS 2003:460). (2003). Utbildningsdepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, A., & Pacini-Ketchabaw, V. (2015). Learning with children, ants, and worms in the Anthropocene: Towards a common world pedagogy of multispecies vulnerability. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 23(4), 507–529. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2015.1039050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, G. (2011). Field birding and digital objects: Immaterial technologies and their implications for one practice of coming to know the more-than-human. Environmental Education Research, 17(6), 789–799. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2011.618623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver, J. A., & Snaza, N. (2017). Against methodocentrism in educational research. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(11), 1055–1065. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2016.1140015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weldemariam, K. (2020). Learning with vital materialities: Weather assemblage pedagogies in early childhood education. Environmental Education Research, 26(7), 935–949. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1761300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winks, L. (2018). Discomfort in the field—The performance of nonhuman nature in fieldwork in South Devon. The Journal of Environmental Education, 49(5), 390–399. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2017.1417219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar