Using mixed reality (XR) immersive learning to enhance environmental education

References

• Adhikari, J., Mathrani, A., & Scogings, C. (2021). Analysis of technology-mediated pedagogies: Experiences from a BYOD initiative in New Zealand [Paper presentation] [Paper presentation]. IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Computer Science and Data Engineering (CSDE), Brisbane, Australia. December 8–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSDE53843.2021.9718393
   Google Scholar
• Aguayo, C. (2014). [The use of education for sustainability websites for community education in Chile]. [Doctoral thesis, The University of Waikato]. The University of Waikato Research Commons. https://researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz/handle/10289/8640
   Google Scholar
• Aguayo, C., Cochrane, T., & Narayan, V. (2017). Key themes in mobile learning: Prospects for learner-generated learning through AR and VR. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(6), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguayo, C., Eames, C., & Cochrane, T. (2020). A framework for mixed reality free-choice, self-determined learning. Research in Learning Technology, 28(0), 2347. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v28.2347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amiel, T., & Reeves, T. C. (2008). Design-based research and educational technology: Rethinking technology and the research agenda. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11(4), 29–40. http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.11.4.29
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballantyne, R., & Packer, J. (2011). Using tourism free-choice learning experiences to promote environmentally sustainable behaviour: The role of post-visit ‘action resources. Environmental Education Research, 17(2), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2010.530645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BLAKE. (2022). BLAKE NZ-VR. https://www.blakenz.org/programmes/blake-nz-vr/
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Chawla, L. (2020). Childhood nature connection and constructive hope: A review of research on connecting with nature and coping with environmental loss. People and Nature, 2(3), 619–642. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10128
   Google Scholar
• Corres, A., & Ruiz-Mallén, I. (this issue). Digital technologies and the COVID-19 pandemic: Opportunities and challenges for environmental educators in Barcelona. The Journal of Environmental Education.
   Google Scholar
• Cowling, M., & Birt, J. (2020). Mixed reality multimodal learning analytics. In M. A. Peters & R. Heraud (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Educational Innovation (pp. 1–7). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2262-4_149-1
   Google Scholar
• Davies, R. C. (2021). Mixing realities: The new partnership between human and machine. In M. A. Peters & R. Heraud (Eds), Encyclopedia of educational innovation (pp. 1–8). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2262-4_155-1
   Google Scholar
• De Freitas, S., & Neumann, T. (2009). The use of “exploratory learning” for supporting immersive learning in virtual environments. Computers & Education, 52(2), 343–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Freitas, S., Rebolledo-Mendez, G., Liarokapis, F., Magoulas, G., & Poulovassilis, A. (2010). Learning as immersive experiences: Using the four-dimensional framework for designing and evaluating immersive learning experiences in a virtual world. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01024.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dengel, A., & Mägdefrau, J. (2019). Presence is the key to understanding immersive learning. In et al. Immersive Learning Research Network. iLRN 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science., 1044, 185–198 Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23089-0_14
   Google Scholar
• Ducasse, J. (2020). Augmented reality for outdoor environmental education. In V. Geroimenko (Ed.), Augmented reality in education (pp. 329–352). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42156-4_17
   Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., & Mitchell, R. (2009). Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(1), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-008-9119-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eames, C., & Aguayo, C. (2019). Designing mobile learning with education outside the classroom to enhance marine ecological literacy. Teaching and Learning Research Initiative (pp. 1–20). TLRI. http://www.tlri.org.nz/tlri-research/research-completed/cross-sector/using-mobile-learning-free-choice-educational-settings
   Google Scholar
• Eames, C., & Aguayo, C. (2020). Education outside the classroom: Reinforcing learning from the visit using mixed reality. Set: Research Information for Teachers, 2(2), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.18296/set.0173
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Orienta-Konsultit.
   Google Scholar
• Freina, L., & Ott, M. (2015). A literature review on immersive virtual reality in education: State of the art and perspectives. In Proceedings of eLearning and Software for Education (eLSE), 1(133), 1—8. https://www.itd.cnr.it/download/eLSE%202015%20Freina%20Ott%20Paper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Girod, M., & Wong, D. (2002). An aesthetic (Deweyan) perspective on science learning: Case studies of three fourth ­graders. The Elementary School Journal, 102(3), 199–224. https://doi.org/10.1086/499700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennessy, S., Mavrikis, M., Girvan, C., Price, S., & Winters, N. (2019). BJET Editorial for the 50th Anniversary Volume in 2019: Looking Back, Reaching Forward. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrington, J., Reeves, T. C., & Oliver, R. (2007). Immersive learning technologies: Realism and online authentic learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 19(1), 80–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03033421
   Google Scholar
• Hu, W. Y., & Mo, C. (2017). The study of SROI of the Cheng-Long Wetlands International Environmental Art Project and Setouchi Triennale Art Festival [Paper presentation]. 2017 International Conference on Applied System Innovation (ICASI), May In (pp. 1683–1685). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASI.2017.7988260
   Google Scholar
• Jennett, C., Cox, A. L., Cairns, P., Dhoparee, S., Epps, A., Tijs, T., & Walton, A. (2008). Measuring and defining the experience of immersion in games. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66(9), 641–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, D., Siang See, Z., Billinghurst, M., Goodman, L., & Fealy, S. (2019, November). Extended reality for midwifery ­learning: MR VR demonstration [Paper presentation].The 17th International Conference on Virtual-Reality Continuum and Its Applications in Industry, In (pp. 1–2). https://doi.org/10.1145/3359997.3365739
   Google Scholar
• Jowsey, S., & Aguayo, C. (2017). O-tū-kapua (‘what clouds see’): A mixed reality experience bridging art, science, technology in meaningful ways. Teachers and Curriculum, 17(2), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.15663/tandc.v17i2.166
   Google Scholar
• Kumpulainen, K., Wong, C-C., Byman, J., Renlund, J., & Vadeboncoeur, J. A. et al. (this issue). Fostering children’s ecological imagination with augmented storying. The Journal of Environmental Education.
   Google Scholar
• Kuo, M., Barnes, M., & Jordan, C. (2019). Do experiences with nature promote learning? Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 305–309. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leadbetter, J. (2005). Activity theory as a conceptual framework and analytical tool within the practice of educational psychology. Educational and Child Psychology, 22(1), 18–28.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, S. N. (2020). Mixed reality and embodied cognition. In M. A. Peters & R. Heraud (Eds.), Encyclopedia of educational innovation (pp. 1–5). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2262-4_152-1
   Google Scholar
• Lee, K. M. (2004). Presence, explicated. Communication Theory, (1050-3293), 14(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, V. J., & Ardoin, N. M. (this issue). Connecting technologies and nature: Impact and opportunities for digital media use in the context of at-home family environmental learning. The Journal of Environmental Education.
   Google Scholar
• Lindgren, R., Tscholl, M., Wang, S., & Johnson, E. (2016). Enhancing learning and engagement through embodied interaction within a mixed reality simulation. Computers & Education, 95, 174–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, D., Dede, C., Huang, R., & Richards, J. (Eds.) (2017). Virtual, Augmented, and Mixed Realities in Education. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, S., & Liu, Y. (2015). Integrating augmented reality technology to enhance children’s learning in marine education. Environmental Education Research, 21(4), 525–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2014.911247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas, M. J., & Hughes, J. M. (2020). Virtual, augmented and mixed reality in K-12 education: A review of the literature. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 29(2), 231–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1737210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, S., Furness, T., Yuan, Y., Iorio, J., & Wang, Z. (2018). All reality: Virtual, augmented, mixed (x), mediated (x, y), and multimediated reality. arXiv preprint, arXiv:1804.08386 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1804.08386
   Google Scholar
• Milgram, P., & Kishino, F. (1994). A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information and Systems, 77(12), 1321–1329.
   Google Scholar
• Nakata, Y., Tabiraki, K., & Nakata, T. (2019). Development of head direction measuring system using ultrasound for environmental education [Paper presentation]. Proc. SPIE 11049, International Workshop on Advanced Image Technology (IWAIT)., https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2522028
   Google Scholar
• Pachler, N., Bachmair, B., & Cook, J. (2010). Mobile learning: Structures, agency, practices. Springer. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4419-0585-7
   Google Scholar
• Paterson, S. K., Le Tissier, M., Whyte, H., Robinson, L. B., Thielking, K., Ingram, M., & McCord, J. (2020). Examining the potential of art-science collaborations in the anthropocene: A case study of catching a wave. Frontiers in Marine Science, 7, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00340
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renshaw, P., Jackson, K., Mortlock, H., & Tooth, R. (this issue). Enchantment and digital technologies: Cultivating children’s enchantment with the more-than-human through video-walks in local places. The Journal of Environmental Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ritter, K. A., III, Stone, H. N., & Chambers, T. L. (2019). Empowering through knowledge: Exploring place-based environmental education in Louisiana classrooms through virtual reality. Computers in Education Journal, 10(1), 1–7. https://coed.asee.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Empowering-Through-Knowledge-Exploring-Place-based-Environmental-Education-in-Louisiana-Classrooms-Through-Virtual-Reality.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Scully, D., Lehane, P., & Scully, C. (2021). ‘It is no longer scary’: Digital learning before and during the Covid-19 ­pandemic in Irish secondary schools. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(1), 159–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1854844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sleigh, C., & Craske, S. (2017). Art and science in the UK: A brief history and critical reflection. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 42(4), 313–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2017.1381223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. (2018). [Kō Rimurimu ‘To Be Covered in Seaweed’: Sensory Knowing, Holistic Understanding, and Meaningful Encounters Within a Marine Science Centre]. [Master’s thesis, Auckland University of Technology]. Tuwhera. http://hdl.handle.net/10292/11734
   Google Scholar
• Southgate, E., Smith, S. P., Cividino, C., Saxby, S., Kilham, J., Eather, G., Scevak, J., Summerville, D., Buchanan, R., & Bergin, C. (2019). Embedding immersive virtual reality in classrooms: Ethical, organisational and educational lessons in bridging research and practice. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 19, 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2018.10.002
   Google Scholar
• Speicher, M., Hall, B., & Nebeling, M. (2019). What is mixed reality? [Paper presentation]. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Proceedings (CHI 2019), May 4–9)., (pp. 1–5), CHI. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300767
   Google Scholar
• Taheri, A., & Aguayo, C. (2021, December). Embodied Immersive Design for Experience-Based Learning and Self-Illumination [Paper presentation]. LINK 3rd Conference in Practice-Oriented Research in Art & Design, In, 2(1), 365–366. School of Art and Design, AUT. https://doi.org/10.24135/link2021.v2i1.72
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, G. L., & Disinger, J. F. (2010). The potential role of virtual reality in environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 28(3), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1997.9942828
   Google Scholar
• Tudor, A., Minocha, S., Collins, M., & Tilling, S. (2018). Mobile virtual reality for environmental education. Journal of Virtual Studies, 9(2), 25–36. http://oro.open.ac.uk/52588/
   Google Scholar
• Tytler, R., Prain, V., & Hannigan, S. (2022). Expanding the languages of science and how they are learnt. Research in Science Education, 52(1), 379–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09952-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Videla, R., Aguayo, C., & Veloz, T. (2021). From STEM to STEAM: An enactive and ecological continuum. Frontiers in Education, 6, 709560. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.709560
   Google Scholar
• Wheaton, M., Ardoin, N. M., Hunt, C., Schuh, J. S., Kresse, M., Menke, C., & Durham, W. (2015). Using web and mobile technology to motivate pro-environmental action after a nature-based tourism experience. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 24(4), 594–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2015.1081600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar