4,668
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Understanding Austrian middle school students’ connectedness with nature

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Ardoin, N. M., Bowers, A. W., & Gaillard, E. (2020). Environmental education outcomes for conservation: A systematic review. Biological Conservation, 241, 108224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108224
  • Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 596–612. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596
  • Balmford, A., Clegg, L., Coulson, T., & Taylor, J. (2002). (2367). Why conservationists should Heed Pokémon. Science (New York, N.Y.), 295(5564), 2367–2367. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.295.5564.2367b
  • Balmford, A., & Cowling, R. M. (2006). Fusion or failure? The future of conservation biology. Conservation Biology. 20, 695. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00434.x
  • Braun, T., & Dierkes, P. (2017). Connecting students to nature - how intensity of nature experience and student age influence the success of outdoor education programs. Environmental Education Research, 23(7), 937–949. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1214866
  • Bruni, C. M., & Schultz, P. W. (2010). Implicit beliefs about self and nature: Evidence from an IAT game. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.10.004
  • Bruni, C. M., Winter, P. L., Schultz, P. W., Omoto, A. M., & Tabanico, J. J. (2017). Getting to know nature: evaluating the effects of the Get to Know Program on children’s connectedness with nature. Environmental Education Research, 23(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2015.1074659
  • Cagle, N. L. (2018). Changes in experiences with nature through the lives of environmentally committed university faculty. Environmental Education Research, 24(6), 889–898. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1342116
  • Chawla, L. (2020). Childhood nature connection and constructive hope: A review of research on connecting with nature and coping with environmental loss. People and Nature, 2(3), 619–642. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10128
  • Chawla, L., & Derr, V. (2012). The development of conservation behaviors in childhood and youth.
  • Cheng, J. C. H., & Monroe, M. C. (2012). Connection to nature: Children’s affective attitude toward nature. Environment and Behavior, 44(1), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916510385082
  • Cincera, J., Valesova, B., Krepelkova, S., Simonova, P., & Kroufek, R. (2019). Place-based education from three perspectives. Environmental Education Research, 25(10), 1510–1523. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2019.1651826
  • Clayton, S. (2003). Environmental identity: A conceptual and an operational definition. In S. Clayton & S. Opotow (Eds.), Identity and the natural environment: The psychological significance of nature, 45–65. MIT Press.
  • Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104
  • Dettmann-Easler, D., & Pease, J. L. (1999). Evaluating the effectiveness of residential environmental education programs in fostering positive attitudes toward wildlife. The Journal of Environmental Education, 31(1), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958969909598630
  • Duerden, M. D., & Witt, P. A. (2010). The impact of direct and indirect experiences on the development of environmental knowledge, attitudes, and behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 379–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.03.007
  • Dutcher, D. D., Finley, J. C., Luloff, A. E., & Johnson, J. B. (2007). Connectivity with nature as a measure of environmental values. Environment and Behavior, 39(4), 474–493. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916506298794
  • Ernst, J., & Theimer, S. (2011). Evaluating the effects of environmental education programming on connectedness to nature. Environmental Education Research, 17(5), 577–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2011.565119
  • Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage Publications Ltd.
  • Fränkel, S., Sellmann-Risse, D., & Basten, M. (2019). Fourth graders’ connectedness to nature – Does cultural background matter? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 66, 101347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101347
  • Genovart, M., Tavecchia, G., Enseñat, J., & Laiolo, P. (2013). Holding up a mirror to the society: Children recognize exotic species much more than local ones. Biological Conservation, 159, 484–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.10.028
  • Gifford, R., & Sussman, R. (2012). Environmental attitudes. In S. D. Clayton (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology (pp. 65–80). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199733026.013.0004
  • Jordan, M. (2009). Nature and self—An ambivalent attachment? Ecopsychology, 1(1), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2008.0003
  • Kaiser, F., Roczen, N., & Bogner, F. (2008). Competence formation in environmental education: Advancing ecology-specific rather than general abilities. Umweltpsychologie, 12 (2), 56–70. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-9249
  • Kals, E., Schumacher, D., & Montada, L. (1999). Emotional affinity toward nature as a motivational basis to protect nature. Environment and Behavior, 31(2), 178–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139169921972056
  • Kantomaa, M., Tammelin, T., Näyhä, S., & Taanila, A. (2007). Adolescents’ physical activity in relation to family income and parents’ education. Preventive Medicine, 44(5), 410–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.01.008
  • Kareiva, P. (2008). Ominous trends in nature recreation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 2758. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0800474105
  • Kellert, S. R., & Wilson, E. O. (1993). The biophilia hypothesis (Vol. 4). Island Press.
  • Kesebir, S., & Kesebir, P. (2017). A growing disconnection from nature is evident in cultural products. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(2), 258–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616662473
  • Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401
  • Kossack, A., & Bogner, F. X. (2012). How does a one-day environmental education programme support individual connectedness with nature? Journal of Biological Education, 46(3), 180–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2011.634016
  • Kuckartz, U., & Rädiker, S. (2019). Analyzing qualitative data with MAXQDA. Springer.
  • Kuss, D. J., & Griffiths, M. D. (2017). Social networking sites and addiction: Ten lessons learned. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(3), 311. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14030311
  • Larson, L., Green, G., & Castleberry, S. (2011). Construction and validation of an instrument to measure environmental orientations in a diverse group of children. Environment and Behavior, 43(1), 72–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916509345212
  • Larson, L. R., Szczytko, R., Bowers, E. P., Stephens, L. E., Stevenson, K. T., & Floyd, M. F. (2019). Outdoor time, screen time, and connection to nature: Troubling trends among rural youth? Environment and Behavior, 51(8), 966–991. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916518806686
  • Liefländer, A. K., & Bogner, F. (2014). The effects of children’s age and sex on acquiring pro-environmental attitudes through environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 45(2), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2013.875511
  • Liefländer, A. K., & Bogner, F. X. (2018). Educational impact on the relationship of environmental knowledge and attitudes. Environmental Education Research, 24(4), 611–624. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1188265
  • Liefländer, A. K., Fröhlich, G., Bogner, F. X., & Schultz, P. W. (2013). Promoting connectedness with nature through environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 19(3), 370–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2012.697545
  • Lindemann-Matthies, P., & Bose, E. (2008). How many species are there? Public understanding and awareness of biodiversity in Switzerland. Human Ecology, 36(5), 731–742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-008-9194-1
  • Louv, R. (2006). Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder (6th ed.) Algonqun Books of Chapel Hill.
  • Mayer, F. S., & Frantz, C. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(4), 503–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001
  • Mayer, F. S., Frantz, C. M., Bruehlman-Senecal, E., & Dolliver, K. (2009). Why is nature beneficial?: The role of connectedness to nature. Environment and Behavior, 41(5), 607–643. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916508319745
  • Mayring, P. (2010). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken (11., aktualisierte und überarb. Aufl. ed.). Beltz. http://www.content-select.com/index.php?id=bib_view&ean=9783407291424 https://ubdata.univie.ac.at/AC08813808
  • Michaels, S., Shouse, A. W., Schweingruber, H. A., & Council, N. R. (2007). Ready, set, science!: Putting research to work in K-8 science classrooms. National Academies Press.
  • Michaelson, V., King, N., Janssen, I., Lawal, S., & Pickett, W. (2020). Electronic screen technology use and connection to nature in Canadian adolescents: A mixed methods study. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 111(4), 502–514. https://doi.org/10.17269/s41997-019-00289-y
  • Neumayer, E. (2003). Weak versus strong sustainability: Exploring the limits of two opposing paradigms. In Weak Versus Strong Sustainability: Exploring the Limits of Two Opposing Paradigms. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781007082
  • Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2009). The nature relatedness scale: Linking individuals’ connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 41(5), 715–740. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916508318748
  • Oberwimmer, K., Vogtenhuber, S., Lassnigg, L., & Schreiner, C. (2019). Nationaler Bildungsbericht Österreich 2018. Das Schulsystem im Spiegel von Daten und Indikatoren. Leykam.
  • Otto, S., Evans, G., Moon, M., & Kaiser, F. (2019). The development of children’s environmental attitude and behavior. Global Environmental Change, 58, 101947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101947
  • Otto, S., & Pensini, P. (2017). Nature-based environmental education of children: Environmental knowledge and connectedness to nature, together, are related to ecological behaviour. Global Environmental Change, 47, 88–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.09.009
  • Pergams, O., & Zaradic, P. (2007). Videophilia: Implications for childhood development and conservation. Journal of Developmental Processes, 2, 130–144.
  • Pisa, O. (2019). Results (Volume I): What students know and can do. OECD Publishing.
  • Ponting, C. P. C. (2007). A new green history of the world: The environment and the collapse of great civilizations. Penguin Books.
  • Pyle, R. M. (1993). The thunder tree: Lessons from an urban wildland (Vol. 337). Houghton Mifflin.
  • Richardson, M., Dobson, J., Abson, D. J., Lumber, R., Hunt, A., Young, R., & Moorhouse, B. (2020). Applying the pathways to nature connectedness at a societal scale: a leverage points perspective. Ecosystems and People, 16(1), 387–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2020.1844296
  • Roczen, N., Kaiser, F., Bogner, F., & Wilson, M. (2014). A competence model for environmental education. Environment and Behavior, 46(8), 972–992. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916513492416
  • Salazar, G., Kunkle, K., & Monroe, M. (2020). Practitioner guide to assessing connection to nature. North American Association for Environmental Education.
  • Schleicher, A. (2019). PISA 2018: Insights and Interpretations. OECD Publishing.
  • Schultz, P. W. (2002). Inclusion with nature: The psychology of human-nature relations. In P. Schmuck & P.W. Schultz (Eds.), Psychology of sustainable development (pp. 61–78). Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0995-0_4
  • Schultz, P. W., Shriver, C., Tabanico, J. J., & Khazian, A. M. (2004). Implicit connections with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00022-7
  • Schultz, P. W., & Tabanico, J. (2007). Self, identity, and the natural environment: Exploring implicit connections with nature. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(6), 1219–1247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00210.x
  • Smith, G. A. (2002). Place-based education: Learning to be where we are. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(8), 584–594. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170208300806
  • Sobel, D. (2004). Place-based education: Connecting classroom and community. Nature and Listening, 4(1), 1–7.
  • Soga, M., & Gaston, K. (2016). Extinction of experience: The loss of human-nature interactions. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14(2), 94–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1225
  • Soga, M., & Gaston, K. J. (2021). Towards a unified understanding of human–nature interactions. Nature Sustainability, 5(5), 374–383. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00818-z
  • Tandon, P. S., Zhou, C., Sallis, J. F., Cain, K. L., Frank, L. D., & Saelens, B. E. (2012). Home environment relationships with children’s physical activity, sedentary time, and screen time by socioeconomic status. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 9(1), 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-9-88
  • Tanner, T. (1980). Significant life experiences: A new research area in environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 11(4), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1980.9941386
  • Tseng, Y.-C., & Wang, S.-M. (2020). Understanding Taiwanese adolescents’ connections with nature: Rethinking conventional definitions and scales for environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 26(1), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2019.1668354
  • UNESCO. (2015). Global action programme on education for sustainable development information folder.
  • United Nations Population Division. (2019). U. N. N. York.
  • Vienna City Statistical Yearbook. (2020). M. d. S. Wien.
  • Vining, J., Merrick, M. S., & Price, E. A. (2008). The distinction between humans and nature: Human perceptions of connectedness to nature and elements of the natural and unnatural.
  • Wells, N., & Lekies, K. (2006). Nature and the life course: Pathways from childhood nature experiences to adult environmentalism. Children, Youth and Environments, 16(1), 1–24.
  • Wilson, E. O., Katcher, A., Kellert, S. R., McCarthy, C., McVay, S., & Wilkins, G. (1995). The biophilia hypothesis.
  • Zelenski, J. M., & Nisbet, E. K. (2014). Happiness and feeling connected: The distinct role of nature relatedness. Environment and Behavior, 46(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916512451901
  • Zylstra, M. J., Knight, A. T., Esler, K. J., & Le Grange, L. L. L. (2014). Connectedness as a core conservation concern: An interdisciplinary review of theory and a call for practice. Springer Science Reviews, 2(1-2), 119–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40362-014-0021-3