Far-right narratives of climate change acceptance and their role in addressing climate skepticism

References

• Abbott, H. P. (2002). The Cambridge introduction to narrative. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Adlong, W., & Dietsch, E. (2015). Environmental education and the health professions: framing climate change as a health issue. Environmental Education Research, 21(5), 687–709. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2014.930727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badullovich, N. (2022). ‘It is a bloody big and responsible job’: Perspectives on climate change communication from Australia-focused practitioners. Climate Action, 1(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44168-022-00021-6
   Google Scholar
• Barthes, R. (1975). An introduction to the structural analysis of narrative. New Literary History, 6(2), 237–272. https://doi.org/10.2307/468419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertolotti, M., Catellani, P., & Nelson, T. (2021). Framing messages on the economic impact of climate change policies: effects on climate believers and climate skeptics. Environmental Communication, 15(6), 715–730. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2021.1890175
   Google Scholar
• Bloomfield, E. (2019). Communication strategies for engaging climate skeptics. Religion and the environment. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boykoff, M. (2019). Creative (climate) communications. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brockriede, W. (1972). Arguers as lovers. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 5(1), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, K., & Mondon, A. (2021). Populism, the media, and the mainstreaming of the far right: The Guardian’s coverage of populism as a case study. Politics, 41(3), 279–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cislak, A., Cichocka, A., Wojcik, A. D., & Milfont, T. L. (2021). Words not deeds: National narcissism, national identification, and support for greenwashing versus genuine proenvironmental campaigns. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 74, 101576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, R. (2007). Nature’s “crisis disciplines”: Does environmental communication have an ethical duty? Environmental Communication, 1(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524030701333948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daggett, C. (2020). The melodrama of climate change denial. Green European Journal. Retrieved December June 11, 2021, from https://www.greeneuropeanjournal.eu/the-melodrama-of-climate-change-denial/
   Google Scholar
• Diprose, G., Thomas, A., & Bond, S. (2016). ‘It’s who we are’: Eco-nationalism and place in contesting deep-sea oil in Aotearoa New Zealand. Kōtuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online, 11(2), 159–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/1177083X.2015.1134594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Benoist, A., & Champetier, C. (1999). The French New Right in the year 2000. Retrieved June 25, 2017, from http://home.alphalink.com.au/∼radnat/debenoist/alain9.html
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S., & Lo, A. Y. (2015). Reason and rhetoric in climate communication. Environmental Politics, 24(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2014.961273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faye, G. (2012). Convergence of catastrophes. Arktos.
   Google Scholar
• Flusberg, S., Matlock, T., & Thibodeau, P. (2018). War metaphors in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 33(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2018.1407992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forchtner, B. (forthcoming). Thunberg, not iceberg: Visual melodrama in German far-right climate change communication. In I. K. Allen, K. Ekberg, S. Holgersen and A. Malm (Eds.), Political Ecologies of the far Right. Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forchtner, B. (2019a). Climate change and the far right. WIREs Climate Change, 10(5), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.604
   Google Scholar
• Forchtner, B. (2019b). Far-right articulations of the natural environments: An introduction. In B. Forchtner (Ed.), The far right and the environment: politics, discourse and communication (pp. 1–17). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Forchtner, B. (2023). Studying the far right’s natural environments: Toward a visual turn. In B. Forchtner (Ed). Visualizing far-right environments. Communication and the politics of nature. Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forchtner, B., & Kølvraa, C. (2015). The nature of nationalism: Populist radical right parties on countryside and climate. Nature and Culture, 10(2), 199–224. https://doi.org/10.3167/nc.2015.100204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forchtner, B., & Lubarda, B. (2023). Scepticisms and beyond? A comprehensive portrait of climate change communication by the far right in the European Parliament. Environmental Politics, 32(1), 43–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2022.2048556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forchtner, B., Jorge, M. E., & Eder, K. (2020). Towards a revised theory of collective learning processes: Argumentation, narrative and the making of the social bond. European Journal of Social Theory, 23(2), 200–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431018814348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greimas, A. J. (1966/1983). Structural semantics. An attempt at a method. University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gainous, J., & Merry, M. (2022). Climate change as a national security Issue: Examining framing effects across party. American Politics Research, 50(2), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X211053213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, A. (2019). Environment, media and communication. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, A., and Cox, R. (Eds.). (2022). The Routledge handbook of environment and communication. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, R., Fesenfeld, L., & Bernauer, T. (2020). Political populism, responsiveness, and public support for climate mitigation. Climate Policy, 20(3), 373–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1736490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsella, W. J., Bsumek, P. K., Walker, G. B., Kinsella, W. J., Check, T., Peterson, T. R., & Schwarze, S. (2008). Narratives, rhetorical genres, and environmental conflict: Responses to Schwarze’s “environmental melodrama”. Environmental Communication, 2(1), 78–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524030801980242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazić, A., & Žeželj, I. (2021). A systematic review of narrative interventions: Lessons for countering anti-vaccination conspiracy theories and misinformation. Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England), 30(6), 644–670. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625211011881
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockwood, M. (2018). Right-wing populism and the climate change agenda: Exploring the linkages. Environmental Politics, 27(4), 712–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1458411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubarda, B. (2019). Far-right agricultural alternatives to right-wing populism in Hungary: The “real” caretakers of the blood and soil. Culture della Sostenibilità, 24(1), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Lubarda, B. (2020). Beyond ecofascism? Far-right ecologism (FRE) as a framework for future inquiries. Environmental Values, 29(6), 713–732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubarda, B. (2021). Far-right grassroots environmental activism in poland and the blurry lines of ‘acceptable’ environmentalisms. In E. Kovacs (Ed.), Politics and the environment in Eastern Europe (pp. 121–139). Open Book Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lubarda, B. (2023). Far-right ecologism: environmental politics and the far right in Hungary and Poland. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McCright, A. M., Charters, M., Dentzman, K., & Dietz, T. (2016). Examining the effectiveness of climate change frames in the face of a climate change denial counter‐frame. Topics in Cognitive Science, 8(1), 76–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGreavy, B., Druschke, C. G., Sprain, L., Thompson, J. L., & Lindenfeld, L. A. (2016). Environmental communication pedagogy for sustainability: Developing core capacities to engage with complex problems. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 15(3), 261–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533015X.2016.1181018
   Google Scholar
• Milstein, T., Pileggi, M., & Morgan, E. (2017). Environmental communication pedagogy and practice. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mölzer, A. (2019). Im Kampf um die Zukunftsthemen, Zuerst! 8–9, 39.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, A., & Roberts, S. (2021). The rise of ecofascism: Climate change and the far right. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Nabi, R. L., Gustafson, A., & Jensen, R. (2018). Framing climate change: Exploring the role of emotion in generating advocacy behavior. Science Communication, 40(4), 442–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547018776019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, S., & Nicholson-Cole, S. (2009). “Fear won’t do it”: Promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Science Communication, 30(3), 355–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547008329201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, J. (1999). Nature and nationalism: Right-wing ecology and the politics of identity in contemporary Germany. Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Ovid, D., & Mafeta Phaka, F. (2022). Idwi, Xenopus laevis, and African clawed frog: Teaching counternarratives of invasive species in postcolonial ecology. The Journal of Environmental Education, 53(2), 69–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2022.2032564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pikkarainen, E. (2017). Educational semiotics, Greimas, and theory of action. In Encyclopedia of educational philosophy and theory (pp. 675–680). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Polish Autonomous Nationalists (Autonom. Pl). (2009). Mały ekologiczny aktywizm. Available at http://www.autonom.pl/maly-ekologiczny-aktywizm/ Accessed 10 September 2023
   Google Scholar
• Postone, M. (1980). Anti-Semitism and National Socialism: Notes on the German reaction to “Holocaust. New German Critique, 19(19), 97–115. https://doi.org/10.2307/487974
   Google Scholar
• Raile, E. D., Shanahan, E. A., Ready, R. C., McEvoy, J., Izurieta, C., Reinhold, A. M., Poole, G. C., Bergmann, N. T., & King, H. (2022). Narrative risk communication as a Lingua Franca for environmental hazard preparation. Environmental Communication, 16(1), 108–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2021.1966818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ringmar, E. (1996). Identity, interest, and action: A cultural explanation of Sweden’s intervention in the Thirty Tears War. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schäfer, M. S. (2012). Online communication on climate change and climate politics: A literature review. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 3(6), 527–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaller, S., & Carius, A. (2019). Convenient truths: Mapping climate agendas of right-wing populist parties in Europe. Adelphi.
   Google Scholar
• Somers, M. (1994). The narrative constitution of identity. Theory and Society, 23(5), 605–649. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternhell, Z., Sznaider, M., & Asheri, M. (1994). The birth of fascist ideology. From cultural rebellion to political revolution. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suldovsky, B. (2017). The information Deficit Model and climate change communication. Climate Science. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.301
   Google Scholar
• Toolan, M. J. (1988). Narrative. A critical linguistic introduction. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Rensburg, W. (2015). Climate change skepticism: A conceptual re-evaluation. SAGE Open, 5(2), 215824401557972. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015579723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitmarsh, L., & Lorenzoni, I. (2010). Perceptions, behavior and communication of climate change. WIREs Climate Change, 1(2), 158–161. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.7
   Google Scholar
• Whitmarsh, L., & Corner, A. (2017). Tools for a new climate conversation: A mixed-methods study of language for public engagement across the political spectrum. Global Environmental Change, 42, 122–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolsko, C., Ariceaga, H., & Seiden, J. (2016). Red, white, and blue enough to be green: Effects of moral framing on climate change attitudes and conservation behaviors. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 65, 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zia, A., & Todd, A. M. (2010). Evaluating the effects of ideology on public understanding of climate change science: How to improve communication across ideological divides? Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England), 19(6), 743–761. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662509357871
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar