The Role of Dismissal in the American Criminal Court: Court Theories Revisited

REFERENCES

• Alfini, JamesJ. (ed.). (1981). Misdemeanor Courts: Policy Concerns and Research Perspectives. U.S. Department of Justice. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• American Bar Association. (1992). ABA Standards for Criminal Justice: Prosecution Function . (approved in 1992), available online at www.abanet.org.
   Google Scholar
• ———. (1997). ABA Standards for Criminal Justice: Pleas of Guilty . (approved in 1997), available online at www.abanet.org.
   Google Scholar
• Beccaria, Cessare. (1963)[1764]. On Crimes and Punishments. Indianapolis: The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bettman, Alfred. (1931). “A Statistical Analysis of the Disposition of Criminal Cases in Various Cities and Rural Areas of the United States.” In National Commission on Law Observance and Enforcement, Report on Prosecution (#4). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Bettman, Alfred, and F. Burns. (1922). “Prosecution.” In Criminal Justice in Cleveland, edited by Roscoe Pound and Felix Frankfurter, . 83–225. Cleveland: The Cleveland Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Blumstein, Alfred, and Alex.R. Piquero. (2007). “Restore Rationality to Sentencing Policy.” Criminology and Public Policy 6(4):679–687.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley-Engen, Mindy S., Rodney Engen, Chris Shields, Kelly Damphousse, and Brent Smith. (2012). “The Time Penalty: Examining the Relationship between Time to Conviction and Trial vs. Plea Disparities in Sentencing.” Justice Quarterly 29(6):829–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brosi, KathleenB. (1979). A Cross City Comparison of Felony Case Processing. . U.S. Department of Justice. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2006). U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs. Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics 2004. . Available online at http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/cfjs0402.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Church, ThomasW., Alan Carlson, Jo-Lynn Lee, and Teresa Tan. (1978). Justice Delayed: The Pace of Litigation in Urban Trial Courts. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.
   Google Scholar
• Church, ThomasW. (1982). Examining Local Legal Culture: Practitioner Attitudes in Four Criminal Courts. . U.S. Department of Justice. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, PhilipJ. (1980). “Research in Criminal Deterrence: Laying the Groundwork for the Second Decade.” Crime and Justice: A Review of Research 2:211–68.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, RobertO. (1969). Sentencing: The Decision as to Type, Length, and Conditions of Sentence. Boston: Little Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenstein, James, and Herbert Jacob. (1991) [. 1977]. Felony Justice: An Organizational Analysis of Criminal Courts. Lahnam, New York, & London: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, MaynardL., and JackP. Gibbs. (1978). “Objective and Perceptual Properties of Legal Punishment and the Deterrence Doctrine.” Social Problems 25(3):253–64.
   Google Scholar
• Farrington, DavidP., and Roger Tarling (eds.). (1985). Prediction in Criminology. Albany: State University of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Feeley, MalcolmM. (1979). The Process is the Punishment: Handling Cases in a Lower Criminal Court. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Feeley, MalcolmM. (1983). Court Reform on Trial: Why Simple Solutions Fail. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Feeney, Floyd, Forest Dill, and Adrianne Weir. (1983) Arrest Without Conviction: How Often They Occur and Why. . U.S. Department of Justice. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrick, Tom Jr. (2005). “No Dismissing a Sorry Statistic.” Philadelphia Inquirer, . 5 May, B01.
   Google Scholar
• Forst, Brian, Judith Lucianovic, and SarahJ. Cox. (1978). What Happens after Arrest? . U.S. Department of Justice. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Geerken, MichaelR., and WalterR. Gove. (1975). “Deterrence: Some Theoretical Considerations.” Law & Society Review 9(3):497–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldfarb, Ronald. (1967). Ransom: A Critique of the American Bail System. New York: Dover Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, Joseph. (1960). “Police Discretion Not to Invoke the Criminal Process: Low Visibility Decisions in the Administration of Justice.” Yale Law Journal 69(4):543–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldkamp, JohnS., Michael Gottfredson, Peter Jones, and Doris Weiland. (1995). Personal Liberty and Community Safety: Pretrial Release in the Criminal Court. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gottfredson, DonM., and Michael Tonry, eds. (1987). “Prediction and Classification: Criminal Justice Decision Making.” Crime & Justice: A Review of Research, Volume 9.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, Peter, Sorrel Wildhorn, Eugene Poggio, MichaelJ. Strumwasser, and Peter De Leon. (1976). Prosecution of Adult Felony Defendants: A Policy Perspective. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Jacob, Herbert. (1983). “Courts as Organizations.” In Empirical Theories about Courts, edited by K. Boyum and L. Mather, . 191–215. New York: Longman Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, BrianD., and Stephanie DiPietro. (2012). “The Power of Diversion: Intermediate Sanctions and Sentencing Disparity under Presumptive Guidelines.” Criminology 50(3):811–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, BrianD., JefferyT. Ulmer, and JohnH. Kramer. (2008). The Social Context of Guidelines Circumvention: The Case of Federal District Courts. Criminology 46(3):737–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, Nancy. (2013). “Three Directions for Future Research into Sentencing Discretion.” Justice Quarterly 30(2):223–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, NancyJ., DavidA. Soule, Sara Steen, RobertR. Weidner. (2005). “When Process Affects Punishment: Differences in Sentences after Guilty Plea, Bench Trial, and Jury Trial in Five Guidelines States.” Columbia Law Review 105(4):959–1009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaFave, WayneR. (1965). Arrest: The Decision to Take the Suspect into Custody. Boston: Little Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Jeffrey, Grattet, Ryken, and Joan Petersilia. (2010). “Back-End Sentencing and Reimprisonment: Individual, Organizational, and Community Predictors of Parole Sanctioning Decisions.” Criminology 48(3):759–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoy, Candace. (2005). “Plea Bargaining as Coercion: The Trial Penalty and Plea Bargaining Reform.” Criminal Law Quarterly 50:67–107.
   Google Scholar
• McCoy, Craig, Nancy Phillips, and Dylan Purcell. (2009). “Special Investigation: Crisis in the Courts. Justice: Delayed, Dismissed, Denied.” Philadelphia Inquirer, . Dec. 13, A01, A16–20.
   Google Scholar
• McCoy, Craig, Nancy Phillips, and Dylan Purcell. (2010). “Philadelphia to Ease Marijuana Penalty.” Philadelphia Inquirer, . April 5, A01.
   Google Scholar
• McIntyre, DonaldM. Jr. (1967). Law Enforcement in the Metropolis. Chicago: American Bar Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Franc. (1969). Prosecution: The Decision to Charge a Suspect with a Crime. Boston: Little Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Moley, Raymond. (1926). “Foreword to The Missouri Crime Survey.” In The Missouri Association for Criminal Justice. The Missouri Crime Survey. New York: Macmillan Company.
   Google Scholar
• Moley, Raymond. (1929). Politics and Criminal Prosecution. New York: Minton, Balch & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Nagin, DanielS. (1998). “Criminal Deterrence Research at the Outset of the Twenty-First Century.” Crime and Justice: A Review of Research 23:1–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nardulli, PeterF. (1978). The Courtroom Elite: An Organizational Perspective on Criminal Justice. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
   Google Scholar
• Nardulli, PeterF., Flemming, RoyB., and James Eisenstein. (1988). The Tenor of Justice: Felony Courts and the Guilty Plea Process. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for State Court. (2010). Examining the Works of the State Courts. . Available online at: www.ncsconline.org.
   Google Scholar
• National Commission on Law Observance and Enforcement (Wickersham Commission). (1931). Report on Criminal Procedure. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, DonaldJ. (1966). Conviction: The Determination of Guilt or Innocence without Trial. Boston: Little Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Packer, Herbert. (1968). The Limits of the Criminal Sanction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peabody, Bruce. (2004). “Congressional Constitutional Interpretation and the Courts: A Preliminary Inquiry into Legislative Attitudes, 1959–2001.” Law and Social Inquiry 29(10):127–75.
   Google Scholar
• Pound, Roscoe, and Felix Frankfurter (eds.). (1922). Criminal Justice in Cleveland. Cleveland: The Cleveland Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• President's Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice. (1967). The Challenge of Crime in a Free Society. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, JohnP. (1981). “Adjudication and Sentencing in a Misdemeanor Court: The Outcome is the Punishment.” In Misdemeanor Courts: Policy Concerns and Research Perspectives, edited by J.J. Alfini, . 93–136. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Shermer, LaurenO’Neill, and Brian Johnson. (2010). “Criminal Prosecutions: Examining Prosecutorial Discretion and Charge Reductions in U.S. Federal District Courts.” Justice Quarterly 27(3):394–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stemen, Don, and AndresF. Rengifo. (2011). “Policies and Imprisonment: The Impact of Structured Sentencing and Determinate Sentencing on State Incarceration Rates, 1978–2004.” Justice Quarterly 28(1):174–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, ReginaldH., and HerbertB. Ehrmann. (1922). “The Criminal Courts.” In Criminal Justice in Cleveland, edited by Roscoe Pound and Felix Frankfurter. , 227–372. Cleveland: The Cleveland Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics Online. . Available at: http://www.albany.edu/sourcebook
   Google Scholar
• Stafford, MarkC., and Mark Warr. (1993). A Reconceptualization of General and Specific Deterrence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 30(2):123–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, John.R. (2013). Symbol and Substance: Effects of California's Three Strikes Law on Felony Sentencing. Law & Society Review 47(1): 37–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanfani, Joseph, Thomas Fitzgerald, and Rose Ciotta. (2005). “Phila. Dismisses Half of Felony Cases.” Philadelphia Inquirer, . 15 May, A01.
   Google Scholar
• Ulmer, JefferyT., and MindyS. Bradley. (2006). “Variation in Trial Penalties among Serious Violent Offenses.” Criminology 44(3):631–670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vera Institute of Justice. (1977). Felony Arrests: Their Prosecution and Disposition in New York City's Courts.. New York: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Vîlcică, E.Rely. (2012). “Nature and Consequences of Dismissals: Implications for Public Safety and Crime Prevention in Criminal Courts in America.” Journal of Criminal Justice 40(2):103–16.
   Google Scholar
• Von Hentig, Hans. (1938). “The Limits of Deterrence.” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 29(4):555–561.
   Google Scholar
• Von Hirsch, Andrew. (2005). Proportionate Sentencing: Exploring the Principles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, Samuel. (1980). Popular Justice: A History of American Criminal Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• . ———. (1992). “Origins of the Contemporary Criminal Justice Paradigm: The American Bar Foundation Survey, 1953–1969.” Justice Quarterly 9(1):47–76.
   Google Scholar
• . ———. (1993). Taming the System: The Control of Discretion in Criminal Justice 1950–1990. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, KirkW., and Richard Hawkins. (1986). “Perceptual Research on General Deterrence: A Critical Review.” Law & Society Review 20(4):545–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooldrege, John. (2010). “Judges’ Unequal Contributions to Extralegal Disparities in Imprisonment.” Criminology 48(2):539–68.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Yan, ChristopherD. Maxwell, and MichaelS. Vaughn. (2009). “The Impact of State Sentencing Policies on the U.S. Prison Population.” Journal of Criminal Justice 37(2):190–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar