159
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Succession, Opportunism, and Rebellion on State Supreme Courts: Decisions to Run for Chief Justice

, &

References

  • Abraham, Henry J. 1999. Justices, Presidents, and Senators: A History of the U.S. Supreme Court Appointments from Washington to Clinton. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Abramson, Paul R., John H. Aldrich, and David W. Rohde. 1987. “Progressive Ambition among United States Senators: 1972-1988.” The Journal of Politics 49 (1):3–35. doi: 10.2307/2131132.
  • Barrow, Deborah J., Zuk Gary, and Gerald S. Gryski. 1996. The Federal Judiciary and Institutional Change. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Bonica, A., and Woodruff, M. J. 2015. “A Common-Space Measure of State Supreme Court Ideology.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organizations 31 (3):472–498.
  • Bonneau, Chris W. 2005. “Electoral Verdicts: Incumbent Defeats in State Supreme Court Elections.” American Politics Research 33 (6):818–41. doi: 10.1177/1532673X04273414.
  • Bonneau, Chris W. 2006. “Vacancies on the Bench: Open-Seat Elections for State Supreme Courts.”Justice System Journal 31:143–59.
  • Bonneau, Chris W., and Melinda Gann Hall. 2003. “Predicting Challengers in State Supreme Court Elections: Context and the Politics of Institutional Design.” Political Research Quarterly 56 (3):337–49. doi: 10.2307/3219793.
  • Bonneau, Chris W., and Melinda Gann Hall. 2009. In Defense of Judicial Elections. New York: Routlege.
  • Brace, Paul, and Melinda Gann Hall. 1990. “Neo-Institutionalism and Dissent in State Supreme Courts.” The Journal of Politics 52 (1):54–70. doi: 10.2307/2131419.
  • Brace, Paul, and Brent D. Boyea. 2008. “State Public Opinion, the Death Penalty, and the Practice of Electing Judges.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (2):360–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00317.x.
  • Bratton, Kathleen A., and Rorie L. Spill. 2004. “Moving up the Judicial Ladder: The Nomination of State Supreme Court Justices to the Federal Courts.” American Politics Research 32 (2):198–218. doi: 10.1177/1532673X03259200.
  • Buchanan, David, and Richard Badham. 1999. “Politics and Organizational Change: The Lived Experience.” Human Relations 52 (5):609–29. doi: 10.1177/001872679905200503.
  • Cameron, Charles M., Albert D. Cover, and Jeffrey A. Segal. 1990. “Senate Voting on Supreme Court Nominees: A Neoinstitutional Model.” American Political Science Review 84 (2):525–34.
  • Cann, Damon, and Teena Wilhelm. 2011. “Case Visibility and the Electoral Connection in State Supreme Courts.” American Politics Research 39 (3):557–81. doi: 10.1177/1532673X10385778.
  • Case, Thomas L., Robert J. Vandenberg, and Paul H. Meridith. 1990. “Internal and External Change Agents.” Leadership & Organization Development Journal 11:4–15. doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000001147.
  • Clark, Tom. 2005. “A Note on the Moore Cases and Judicial Administration.” Justice System Journal 26:355–61.
  • Curry, Todd A., and Mark S. Hurwitz. 2016. “Institutional Effects on the Careers of State Supreme Court Justices.” American Review of Politics 35 (1):44–64. doi: 10.15763/issn.2374-7781.2016.35.44-64.
  • Danelski, David J. 1989. “The Influence of the Chief Justice in the Decisional Process of the Supreme Court.” In American Court Systems: Readings in Judicial Process and Behavior, edited by Sheldon Goldman, 2nd ed. New York: Longman.
  • Fernandez, Sergio, and Hal G. Rainey. 2006. “Managing Successful Organizational Change in the Public Sector.” Public Administration Review 66 (2):168–76. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00570.x.
  • Fleer, Jack D. 1994. North Carolina Government and Politics. Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press.
  • Fox, R. L. and Lawless, J. L. 2005. “To Run or Not to Run for Office: Explaining Nascent Political Ambition.” American Journal of Political Science 49:642–659.
  • Giles, Michael W., Virginia A. Hettinger, and Todd C. Peppers. 2001. “Picking Federal Judges: A Note on Policy and Partisan Selection Agendas.” Political Research Quarterly 54 (3):623–41. doi: 10.2307/449273.
  • Goelzhauser, Greg. 2016. Choosing State Supreme Court Justices: Merit Selection and The Consequences of Institutional Reform. Temple: Temple University Press.
  • Hall, Matthew E. K., and Jason H. Windett. 2016. “Discouraging Dissent: The Chief Judge’s Influence in State Supreme Courts.” American Politics Research 44 (4):682–709. doi: 10.1177/1532673X16640743.
  • Hall, Melinda Gann. 1987. “Constituent Influence in State Supreme Courts: Conceptual Notes and a Case Study.” The Journal of Politics 49 (4):1117–24. doi: 10.2307/2130788.
  • Hall, Melinda Gann. 1989. “Opinion Assignment Procedures and Conference Practices in State Supreme Courts.” Judicature 73:209–14.
  • Hall, Melinda Gann. 2001. “State Supreme Courts in American Democracy: Probing the Myths of Judicial Reform.” American Political Science Review 95 (2):315–30. doi: 10.1017/S0003055401002234.
  • Hall, Melinda Gann. 2011. “Attack Advertising and the Incumbency Advantage in State Supreme Courts.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Seattle, Washington.
  • Hall, Melinda Gann, and Chris W. Bonneau. 2006. “Does Quality Matter? Challengers in State Supreme Court Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (1):20–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00167.x.
  • Hughes, David A. 2019. “Judicial Institutions and the Political Economy of Retirements.” Political Behavior forthcoming.
  • Hughes, David A., Teena Wilhelm, and Richard L. Vining. Jr. 2015. “Deliberation Rules and Opinion Assignment Procedures in State Supreme Courts: A Replication.” Justice System Journal 36 (4):395–410. doi: 10.1080/0098261X.2014.983283.
  • Jacobson, Gary C. 1989. “Strategic Politicians and the Dynamics of U.S. House Elections, 1946-1986.” American Political Science Review 83 (3):773–93. doi: 10.2307/1962060.
  • Jacobson, Gary C. 1987. “The Marginals Never Vanished: Incumbency and Competition in Elections to the U.S. House of Representatives, 1952-1982.” American Journal of Political Science 31 (1):126–41. doi: 10.2307/2111327.
  • Jacobson, Gary C., and Samuel Kernell. 1983. Strategy and Choice in Congressional Elections. 2nd ed. Binghamton, NY: Vail-Ballou.
  • Jensen, Jennifer M., and Wendy L. Martinek. 2009. “The Effects of Race and Gender on the Judicial Ambitions of State Trial Court Judges.” Political Research Quarterly 62 (2):379–92. doi: 10.1177/1065912908319574.
  • Kanter, Rosabeth Moss. 1983. The Change Masters: Innovations for Productivity in the American Corporation. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship.
  • King, Gary, Michael Tomz, and Jason Wittenberg. 2000. “Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (2):347–55. doi: 10.2307/2669316.
  • Langer, Laura, Jody McMullen, Nicholas P. Ray, and, and Daniel D. Stratton. 2003. “Recruitment of Chief Justices on State Supreme Courts: A Choice between Institutional and Personal Goals.” Journal of Politics 65:656–75.
  • Langer, Laura, and Teena Wilhelm. 2005. “The Ideology of State Supreme Court Chief Justices.” Judicature 89:78–86.
  • Langer, Laura, Teena Wilhelm, and Gabriel Sanchez. 2009. “To Shirk or Not to Shirk from the Chief Justice: Associate Justices and Opinion Behavior.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA.
  • Magnuson, Eric. 2008. “Reflections on my (Brief) Time as Chief Justice.” The hennepin lawyer. Hennepin county. Minnesota: Timberlake Publishing.
  • Meyer, Bernard S. 1999. Judicial Retirement Laws of the Fifty States and the District of Columbia. New York: Fordham University Press.
  • Nixon, David C. 2003. “Policy-Making by Different Means: The Chief Justice’s Attempts to Shape Policy through the Judicial Conference of the United States.” Rationality & Society 15:345–60.
  • Norton, Edward C., Hua Wang, and Chunrong Ai. 2004. “Computing Interaction Effects and Standard Errors in Logit and Probit Models.” The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata 4 (2):154–67. doi: 10.1177/1536867X0400400206.
  • Ostberg, C. L., Matthew E. Wetstein, and Craig R. Ducat. 2004. “Leaders, Followers, and Outsiders: Task and Social Leadership on the Canadian Supreme Court in the Early 'Nineties.” Polity 36 (3):505–28. doi: 10.1086/POLv36n3ms3235388.
  • Rohde, David. W. 1979. “Risk-Bearing and Progressive Ambition: The Case of Members of the U.S. House.” American Journal of Political Science 23 (1):1–26. doi: 10.2307/2110769.
  • Schauer, Frederick. 2000. “Incentives, Reputation, and the Inglorious Determinants of Judicial Behavior.” University of Cincinnati Law Review 68:615–36.
  • Schlesinger, Joseph A. 1966. Ambition and Politics: Political Careers in the United States. Chicago: Rand McNally and Company.
  • Schotland, Roy A. 1998. “Comment.” Law and Contemporary Problems 61 (3):149–55. doi: 10.2307/1192421.
  • Sheldon, Charles H., and Linda S. Maule. 1998. Choosing Justice: The Recruitment of State and Federal Judges. Pullman: Washington State University Press.
  • Streb, Matthew, J. Frederick. and Brian 2009. “Conditions for Competition in Low-Information Judicial Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 62 (3):523–37. doi: 10.1177/1065912908321698.
  • Tobin, Robert W. 1999. Creating the Judicial Branch: The Unfinished Reform. Williamsburg, Virginia: National Center for State Courts.
  • White, David. 2006. “Parker Says He’s Willing to Defy High Court.” Birmingham News May 26, :1C.
  • Wilhelm, Teena, Richard Vining, Ethan Boldt, and Bryan Black. Forthcoming. “Judicial Reform in the American States: The Chief Justice as Political Advocate.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly.
  • Williams, Margaret S. 2008. “Ambition, Gender, and the Judiciary.” Political Research Quarterly 61 (1):68–78. doi: 10.1177/1065912907304497.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.