Advanced search
Publication Cover
Justice System Journal Volume 40, 2019 - Issue 4
Journal homepage
159
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The Effectiveness of the ABA’s Efforts to Increase Defendant Notice of Collateral Consequences: A Survey of South Carolina Defense Attorneys

Peter LeasureDepartment of Criminology and Criminal Justice, York College of Pennsylvania, York, Pennsylvania; Correspondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-9393-9882
ORCID Icon,
John BurrowDepartment of Criminology and Criminal Justice, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina;
,
Hunter M. BoehmeDepartment of Criminology and Criminal Justice, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina; ORCID Iconhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-3231-0428
ORCID Icon &
Gary ZhangIndependent Researcher, Long Beach, CaliforniaORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0600-5051
ORCID Icon
Pages 302-318 | Published online: 14 Sep 2019

References

  • Abrams, David S., and Albert H. Yoon. 2007. “The Luck of the Draw: Using Random Case Assignment to Investigate Attorney Ability.” The University of Chicago Law Review 74 (4):1145–77. doi: 10.2307/20141859.
  • American Bar Association. 2004. ABA Standards for Criminal Justice: Collateral Sanctions and Discretionary Disqualification of Convicted Persons. Washington, DC: American Bar Association.
  • American Bar Association. 2004. “Criminal Justice Standards for the Defense Function.” American Bar Association. https://www.americanbar.org/groups/criminal_justice/standards/DefenseFunctionFourthEdition.html.
  • American Bar Association. 2016. “Criminal Justice Standards on Mental Health.” American Bar Association. https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publications/criminal_justice_standards/mental_health_standards_2016.authcheckdam.pdf
  • American Bar Association. 2018. Criminal Justice Section Programs and Events. https://www.americanbar.org/groups/criminal_justice/events_cle/.
  • American Bar Association. 1999. Criminal Justice Standard 14-3.2. (f) Responsibilities of Defense Counsel.
  • Amicus Brief for Texas v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. 2018. Submitted by the National Employment Law Project. https://s27147.pcdn.co/wp-content/uploads/Amicus-Brief-Texas-v-EEOC-Fifth-Circuit-Appeal.pdf.
  • Armstrong, David, Ann Gosling, John Weinman, and Theresa Marteau. 1997. “The Place of Inter-Rater Reliability in Qualitative Research: An Empirical Study.” Sociology 31 (3):597–606. doi: 10.1177/0038038597031003015.
  • Arn, Lauren A. 1974. “A Progress Report.” American Criminal Law Review 12:477.
  • Austen, Ben. 2018. “In Philadelphia, a Progressive D.A. Tests the Power — and Learns the Limits — of His Office.” New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/30/magazine/larry-krasner-philadelphia-district-attorney-progressive.html.
  • Babbie, E. 2010. The Practice of Social Research. Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.
  • Bibas, Stephanos. 2011. “Regulating the Plea-Bargaining Market: From Caveat Emptor to Consumer Protection.” California Law Review 99:1117, 1119.
  • Chin, Gabriel J. 2011. “Making Padilla Practical: Defense Counsel and Collateral Consequences at Guilty Plea.” Howard Law Journal 54 (3):675–90.
  • Council of State Governments Justice Center. 2018. Council of State Governments Justice Center. https://niccc.csgjusticecenter.org/description/.
  • Couper, Mick P. 2000. “Web Surveys: A Review of Issues and Approaches.” Public Opinion Quarterly 64 (4):464–94.
  • Dillman, Don A. 2000. Mail and Internet Surveys, the Tailored Design Method. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Etikan, Ilker, Sulaiman Abubakar Musa, and Rukayya Sunusi Alkassim. 2016. “Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling.” American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics 5 (1):1–4. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11.
  • Ewald, Alec C., and Marnie Smith. 2008. “Collateral Consequences of Criminal Convictions in American Courts: The View from the State Bench.” Justice System Journal 29 (2):145–65.
  • Fereday, Jennifer, and Eimear Muir-Cochrane. 2006. “Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5 (1):80–92. doi: 10.1177/160940690600500107.
  • Fricker, Ronald D., and Matthias Schonlau. 2002. “Advantages and Disadvantages of Internet Research Surveys: Evidence from the Literature.” Field Methods 14 (4):347–67. doi: 10.1177/152582202237725.
  • Glaser, Barney. 1978. Theoretical Sensitivity. Mill Valley: Sociology Press.
  • Goulette, Natalie W., Angela K. Reitler, James Frank, Whitney Flesher, and Lawrence F. Travis III. 2014. “Criminal Justice Practitioners’ Perceptions of Collateral Consequences of Criminal Conviction on Offenders.” Criminal Justice Review 39 (3):290–304. doi: 10.1177/0734016814526752.
  • Gunnison, Elaine, and Jacqueline B. Helfgott. 2013. Offender Reentry: Beyond Crime and Punishment. Boulder: Lynne Rinner Publishers.
  • Harris, Fiona, Anne Marie MacKintosh, Simon Anderson, Gerard Hastings, Ron Borland, Geoffrey T. Fong, David Hammond, and K. Michael Cummings. 2006. “Effects of the 2003 Advertising/Promotion Ban in the United Kingdom on Awareness of Tobacco Marketing: Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey.” Tobacco Control 15 (suppl_3):iii26–iii33. doi: 10.1136/tc.2005.013110.
  • Harris, Catherine T., Ralph Peeples, and Thomas B. Metzloff. 2008. “Does Being a Repeat Player Make a Difference? The Impact of Attorney Experience and Case-Picking on the Outcome of Medical Malpractice Lawsuits.” Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics 8 (2):1–30.
  • Hoddinott, Susan N., and Martin J. Bass. 1986. “The Dillman Total Design Survey Method.” Canadian Family Physician 32:2366.
  • Houlden, Pauline, and Steven Balkin. 1985. “Quality and Cost Comparisons of Private Bar Indigent Defense Systems: Contract vs. ordered Assigned Counsel.” Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 76:176.
  • Ishak, Noriah Mohd., and Abu Yazid Abu Bakar. 2012. “Qualitative Data Management and Analysis Using NVivo: An Approach Used to Examine Leadership Qualities among Student Leaders.” Education Research Journal 2 (3):94–103.
  • Iyengar, Radha. 2007. “An Analysis of the Performance of Federal Indigent Defense Counsel.” https://www.ils.ny.gov/files/Iyengar%202007.pdf.
  • Jain, Eisha. 2015. “Prosecuting Collateral Consequences.” The Georgetown Law Journal 104:1197.
  • Jameson, William J. 1974. “The Beginning: Background and Development Standards of the ABA Standards for Criminal Justice.” American Criminal Law Review 12.
  • Kendall, Judy. 1999. “Axial Coding and Grounded Theory.” Western Journal of Nursing Research 21 (6):743–57. doi: 10.1177/01939459922044162.
  • Krefting, Laura. 1991. “Rigor in Qualitative Research: The Assessment of Trustworthiness.” American Journal of Occupational Therapy 45 (3):214–22. doi: 10.5014/ajot.45.3.214.
  • Lee, Cynthia G., Brian J. Ostrom, and Matthew Kleiman. 2014. “The Measure of Good Lawyering: Evaluating Holistic Defense in Practice.” Albany Law Review 78:1215.
  • Lewis and Clark Law School. 2018. Criminal Law and Justice Program. https://law.lclark.edu/programs/criminal_law/.
  • Levin, Benjamin. 2017. “Criminal Employment Law.” Cardozo Law Review 39:2265.
  • Love, Margaret Colgate. 2011a. “Collateral Consequences after Padilla v. Kentucky: From Punishment to Regulation.” Saint Louis University Public Law Review 30 (87):87–128.
  • Love, Margaret Colgate. 2011b. “Evolving Standards of Reasonableness: The ABA Standards and the Right to Counsel in Plea Negotiations.” Fordham Urban Law Journal 39 (147).
  • Love, Margaret Colgate, and Gabriel J. Chin. 2003. “Old Wine in a New Skin: The ABA Standards on Collateral Sanctions and Discretionary Disqualification of Convicted Persons.” Federal Sentencing Reporter 16 (232).
  • Love, Margaret Colgate, Jenny Roberts, and Cecelia M. Klinegele. 2013. Collateral Consequences of Criminal Convictions: Law, Policy and Practice. Eagan: Thompson West Publishing.
  • Loyola Law School L.A. 2018. Collateral Consequences of Conviction Justice Project. https://www.lls.edu/academics/centers/centerforjuvenilelawpolicy/theclinics/collateralconsequencesofconvictionjusticeproject/.
  • Marcus, Martin. 2009. “The Making of the ABA Criminal Justice Standards: Forty Years of Excellence.” Criminal Justice 23 (4):1–6.
  • McCarty, Maggie, Gene Falk, Randy Alison Aussenberg, and David H. Carpenter. 2016. “Drug testing and crime-related restrictions in TANF, SNAP, and housing assistance.” Congressional Research Service. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42394.pdf.
  • Murray, Brian M. 2014. “Beyond the Right to Counsel: Increasing Notice of Collateral Consequences.” University of Richmond Law Review 49 (1139).
  • National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws. 2010. “Uniform Collateral Consequences of Conviction Act.” National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws.
  • National Employment Law Project. 2017. “The 2012 EEOC Guidance on the Consideration of Arrest & Conviction Records in Employment Decisions.” https://www.nelp.org/publication/2012-eeoc-guidance-consideration-arrest-conviction-records-employment-decisions/.
  • Patton, Michael Q. 1990. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. 2nd ed. Newbury Park: Wiley Periodicals.
  • Petersilia, Joan. 2003. When Prisoners Come Home: Parole and Prisoner Reentry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Pinard, Michael. 2003. “Broadening the Holistic Mindset: Incorporating Collateral Consequences and Reentry into Criminal Defense Lawyering.” Fordham Urban Law Journal 31:1067.
  • Re, Richard M., and Christopher M. Re. 2012. “Voting and Vice: Criminal Disenfranchisement and the Reconstruction Amendments.” Yale Law Journal 121:1584.
  • Reja, Urša, Katja Lozar Manfreda, Valentina Hlebec, and Vasja Vehovar. 2003. “Open-Ended vs. close-Ended Questions in Web Questionnaires.” Developments in Applied Statistics 19 (1):160–17.
  • Rosenberg, Joanna. 2013. “A Game Changer; the Impact of Padilla v. Kentucky on the Collateral Consequences Rule and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims.” Fordham Law Review 82:1407.
  • Saldaña, J. 2015. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Smith, Alisa, Sean Maddan, Diane D. Price, and Colette Tvedt. 2017. Rush to Judgment: How South Carolina’s Summary Courts Fail to Protect Constitutional Rights. Washington, DC: National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.
  • Smyth, McGregor. 2004. “Holistic Is Not a Bad Word: A Criminal Defense Attorney’s Guide to Using Invisible Punishments as Advocacy Strategy.” University of Toledo Law Review 36:479.
  • Smyth, McGregor. 2010. “From Collateral to Integral: The Seismic Evolution of Padilla v. Kentucky and Its Impact on Penalties beyond Deportation.” Howard Law Journal 54:795.
  • Smyth, McGregor. 2011. “Collateral No More: The Practical Imperative for Holistic Defense in a Post-Padilla World: Or, How to Achieve Consistently Better Results for Clients.” Saint Louis University Public Law Review 31:139.
  • South Carolina Appleseed Legal Justice Center. 2013. Collateral Consequences of Criminal Convictions: Dismantling Barriers to Opportunity. Columbia: South Carolina Appleseed Legal Justice Center.
  • South Carolina Commission on Indigent Defense. 2019. https://sccid.sc.gov/about-us/overview.
  • StataCorp. 2015. Stata Statistical Software: Release 14. College Station: StataCorp LP.
  • Strauss, Anselm, and Juliet Corbin. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedure and Techniques. Newbury Park: Sage.
  • Suri, Harsh. 2011. “Purposeful Sampling in Qualitative Research Synthesis.” Qualitative Research Journal 11 (2):63–75.
  • The American Law Institute. 2014. Model Penal Code: Sentencing Tentative Draft No. 3. Philadelphia: The American Law Institute.
  • Thompson, Darrel. 2019. “No More Double Punishments Lifting the Ban on SNAP and TANF for People with Prior Felony Drug Convictions.” CLASP. https://www.clasp.org/sites/default/files/publications/2019/04/2019.03.15%20No%20More%20Double%20Punishments.pdf.
  • Travis, Jeremy. 2005. But They All Come Back: Facing the Challenges of Prisoner Reentry. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
  • Travis, Jeremy, Bruce Western, and F. Stevens Redburn. 2014. “The Growth of Incarceration in United States: Exploring Causes and Consequences.” https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1026&context=jj_pubs.
  • Uggen, Christopher, Sarah Shannon, and Jeff Manza. 2010. State-Level Estimates of Felon Disenfranchisement in the United States. Washington, DC: The Sentencing Project.
  • Umbach, Paul D. 2004. “Web Surveys: Best Practices.” New Directions for Institutional Research 2004 (121):23–38.
  • Uggen, Christopher, Mike Vuolo, Sarah Lageson, Ebony Ruhland, and Hilary Whitham. 2014. “The Edge of Stigma: An Experimental Audit of the Effects of Low‐Level Criminal Records on Employment.” Criminology 52 (4):627–54.
  • U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Enforcement Guidance. 2012. Consideration of Arrest and Conviction Records in Employment Decisions under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/arrest_conviction.cfm.
  • Van Selm, Martine, and Nicholas W. Jankowski. 2006. “Conducting Online Surveys.” Quality and Quantity 40 (3):435–56. doi: 10.1007/s11135-005-8081-8.
  • Wright, Kevin B. 2005. “Researching Internet-Based Populations: Advantages and Disadvantages of Online Survey Research.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 10 (3). doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00259.x.

Cases and Statutes

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.