Strategic Sensationalism: Why Justices Use Emotional Appeals in Supreme Court Opinions

References

• Baum, Lawrence. 2009. Judges and Their Audiences: a Perspective on Judicial Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Black, Ryan C., Maron W. Sorenson, and Timothy R. Johnson. 2013. “Toward an Actor-Based Measure of Supreme Court Case Salience Information-Seeking and Engagement during Oral Arguments.” Political Research Quarterly 66 (4):804–18. doi: 10.1177/1065912912469729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, Ryan C., Matthew EK. Hall, Ryan J. Owens, and Eve M. Ringsmuth. 2016. “The Role of Emotional Language in Briefs before the US Supreme Court.” Journal of Law and Courts 4 (2):377–407. doi: 10.1086/685660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, Ryan C., and Ryan J. Owens. 2012. “Consider the Source (and the Message) Supreme Court Justices and Strategic Audits of Lower Court Decisions.” Political Research Quarterly 65 (2):385–95. doi: 10.1177/1065912910395324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, Ryan C., and Ryan J. Owens. 2016. “Courting the President: How Circuit Court Judges Alter Their Behavior for Promotion to the Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 60 (1):30–43. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, Ryan C., Ryan J. Owens, Justin Wedeking, and Patrick C. Wohlfarth. 2016. U.S. Supreme Court Opinions and Their Audiences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, Margaret M., and Peter J. Lang. 2010. “Affective Norms for English Words (ANEW): Stimuli, Instruction Manual, and Affective Ratings.” Technical report Technical report C-2, Gainesville, Fl. The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Bryan, Amanda C., and Christopher D. Kromphardt. 2016. “Public Opinion, Public Support, and Counter-Attitudinal Voting on the U.S. Supreme Court.” Justice System Journal 37 (4):298–317. doi: 10.1080/0098261X.2016.1179608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryan, Amanda C., and Eve M. Ringsmuth. 2016. “Jeremiad or Weapon of Words?: The Power of Emotive Language in Supreme Court Dissents.” Journal of Law and Courts 4 (1):159–85. doi: 10.1086/684788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvin, Bryan, Paul M. Collins, Jr., and Matthew Eshbaugh-Soha. 2011. “On the Relationship between Public Opinion and Decision Making in the U.S. Courts of Appeals.” Political Research Quarterly 64 (4):736–48. doi: 10.1177/1065912910376387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, Keith, Michael A. Livermore, and Daniel Rockmore. 2015. “A Quantitative Analysis of Writing Style on the US Supreme Court.” Washington University Law Review 93: 1461
   Google Scholar
• Casillas, Christopher J., Peter K. Enns, and Patrick C. Wohlfarth. 2011. “How Public Opinion Constrains the US Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (1):74–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00485.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, Tom S., Jeffrey R. Lax, and Douglas Rice. 2015. “Measuring the Political Salience of Supreme Court Cases.” Journal of Law and Courts 3 (1):37–65. doi: 10.1086/679111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayton, Cornell W., and Howard Gillman. 1999. Supreme Court Decision-Making: New Institutionalist Approaches. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, Todd A., and Christopher A. Cooper. 2012. “Case Salience and Media Coverage of Supreme Court Decisions toward a New Measure.” Political Research Quarterly 65 (2):396–407. doi: 10.1177/1065912911398047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corley, Pamela C. 2008. “The Supreme Court and Opinion Content: The Influence of Parties’ Briefs.” Political Research Quarterly 61 (3):468–78. doi: 10.1177/1065912907306474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corley, Pamela C. 2010. Concurring Opinion Writing on the U.S. Supreme Court. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corley, Pamela C., Paul M. Collins, Jr, and Bryan Calvin. 2011. “Lower Court Influence on US Supreme Court Opinion Content.” The Journal of Politics 73 (1):31–44. doi: 10.1017/S0022381610000848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, Frank. 2005. “Appellate Court Adherence to Precedent.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 2 (2):369–405. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2005.00054.x.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, Frank B., and Emerson H. Tiller. 1998. “Judicial Partisanship and Obedience to Legal Doctrine: Whistleblowing on the Federal Courts of Appeals.” The Yale Law Journal 107 (7):2155–76. doi: 10.2307/797418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, Frank B., and James W. Pennebaker. 2014. “The Language of the Roberts Court.” Michigan State Law Review2014(4):853.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Richard. 2011. Justices and Journalists: the US Supreme Court and the Media. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, Lee, and Andrew D. Martin. 2010. “Does Public Opinion Influence the Supreme Court? Possibly Yes (but We’re Not Sure Why).” University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 13:263
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, Lee, and Jack Knight. 1997. The Choices Justices Make. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, Lee, and Jack Knight. 1999. “Mapping out the Strategic Terrain: The Informational Role of Amici Curiae.” Supreme Court Decision-Making: New Institutionalist Approaches 215:225–8.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, Lee, and Jeffrey A. Segal. 2000. “Measuring Issue Salience.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (1):66–83. doi: 10.2307/2669293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, Lee, and Tonja Jacobi. 2010. “The Strategic Analysis of Judicial Decisions.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 6 (1):341–58. doi: 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102209-152921.
   Google Scholar
• Frantzich, Stephen E. 2015. Conversations of Democracy: Linking Citizens to American Government. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Garoupa, Nuno, and Tom Ginsburg. 2008. “Judicial Audiences and Reputation: Perspectives from Comparative Law.” Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 47:451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruhl, John. 1980. “The Supreme Court’s Impact on the Law of Libel: Compliance by Lower Federal Courts.” The Western Political Quarterly 33 (4):502–19. doi: 10.2307/448068.
   Google Scholar
• Grundy, Harry. 2000. “Television and Legislatures: The American Experience.” Canadian Parliamentary Review 23:34–6.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Matthew E.K. 2010. The Nature of Supreme Court Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Matthew E.K. 2014. “The Semiconstrained Court: Public Opinion, the Separation of Powers, and the U.S. Supreme Court’s Fear of Nonimplementation.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (2):352–66. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hume, Robert J. 2006. “The Use of Rhetorical Sources by the US Supreme Court.” Law & Society Review 40 (4):817–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2006.00282.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hume, Robert J. 2009. How Courts Impact Federal Administrative Behavior. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hume, Robert J. 2019. “Disagreeable Rhetoric, Shaming, and the Strategy of Dissenting on the US Supreme Court.” Justice System Journal 40 (1):1–18. doi: 10.1080/0098261X.2019.1598901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, Timothy R., Ryan C. Black, and Eve M. Ringsmuth. 2008. “Hear Me Roar: What Provokes Supreme Court Justices to Dissent from the Bench.” Minnesota Law Review 93: 1560–1581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kastellec, Jonathan P. 2016. “Empirically Evaluating the Countermajoritarian Difficulty: Public Opinion, State Policy, and Judicial Review before Roe v. Wade.” Journal of Law and Courts 4 (1):1. doi: 10.1086/683466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krewson, Christopher N. 2019. “Save this Honorable Court: Shaping Public Perceptions of the Supreme Court off the Bench.” Political Research Quarterly 72 (3):686–699 doi: 10.1177/1065912918801563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krewson, Christopher, and Ryan Owens. 2017. “History of Supreme Court Research.” In Handbook of Judicial Behavior, edited by. Robert Howard and Kirk Randazzo. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leval, Pierre N. 2006. “Judging under the Constitution: Dicta about Dicta.” New York University Law Review 81 (4):139–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luse, Jennifer K., Geoffrey McGovern, Wendy L. Martinek, Sara C. Benesh. 2009. “Such Inferior Courts…” Compliance by Circuits with Jurisprudential Regimes.” American Politics Research 37 (1):75–106. doi: 10.1177/1532673X08320233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maltzman, Forrest, James F. Spriggs, and Paul J. Wahlbeck. 2000. Crafting Law on the Supreme Court: the Collegial Game. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, Andrew D., and Kevin M. Quinn. 2002. “Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the US Supreme Court, 1953–1999.” Political Analysis 10 (2):134–53. doi: 10.1093/pan/10.2.134.
   Google Scholar
• McCubbins, Mathew D., and Thomas Schwartz. 1984. “Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols versus Fire Alarms.” American Journal of Political Science 28 (1):165–79. doi: 10.2307/2110792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mixon, Franklin, and Kamal P. Upadhyaya. 2003. Legislative Television as Political Advertising: a Public Choice Approach. Bloomington, IN: iUniverse.
   Google Scholar
• Mixon, Franklin G., M. Troy Jr, Gibson, and Kamal P. Upadhyaya. 2003. “Has Legislative Television Changed Legislator Behavior?: C-SPAN2 and the Frequency of Senate Filibustering.” Public Choice 115 (1–2):139–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondak, Jeffery. 2018. “From Bad to Worse: Political Judgments and Dispositional Variation in the Negativity Bias.”
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, Walter F. 1964. Elements of Judicial Strategy. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Owens, Ryan J., and Justin P. Wedeking. 2011. “Justices and Legal Clarity: Analyzing the Complexity of US Supreme Court Opinions.” Law & Society Review 45 (4):1027–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00464.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens, Ryan J., Justin Wedeking, and Patrick C. Wohlfarth. 2013. “How the Supreme Court Alters Opinion Language to Evade Congressional Review.” Journal of Law and Courts 1 (1):35–59. doi: 10.1086/668482.
   Google Scholar
• Owens, Ryan J., and Patrick C. Wohlfarth. 2017. “Public Mood, Previous Electoral Experience, and Responsiveness among Federal Circuit Court Judges.” American Politics Research 45 (6):1003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohde, David W., and Harold J. Spaeth. 1976. Supreme Court Decision Making New York: WH Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, Gerald N. 2008. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring about Social Change? Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, Meghan J. 2016. “Justice Scalia’s Bottom-up Approach to Shaping the Law.” William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal 25: 297.
   Google Scholar
• Schattschneider, Elmer E. 1960. The Semi-sovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Scheufele, Dietram A., and David Tewksbury. 2007. “Framing, Agenda Setting, and Priming: The Evolution of Three Media Effects Models.” Journal of Communication 57 (1):9–20. doi: 10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00326.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segal, Jeffrey A., and Harold J. Spaeth. 1993. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Segal, Jeffrey A., and Harold J. Spaeth. 1996. “The Influence of Stare Decisis on the Votes of United States Supreme Court Justices.” American Journal of Political Science 40 (4):971–1003. doi: 10.2307/2111738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segal, Jeffrey A., and Harold J. Spaeth. 2002. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Songer, Donald R. 1987. “The Impact of the Supreme Court on Trends in Economic Policy Making in the United States Courts of Appeals.” The Journal of Politics 49 (3):830–41. doi: 10.2307/2131281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Songer, Donald R., Jeffrey A. Segal, and Charles M. Cameron. 1994. “The Hierarchy of Justice: Testing a Principal-Agent Model of Supreme Court-Circuit Court Interactions.” American Journal of Political Science 38 (3):673–96. doi: 10.2307/2111602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Songer, Donald R., and Reginald S. Sheehan. 1990. “Supreme Court Impact on Compliance and Outcomes: Miranda and New York Times in the United States Courts of Appeals.” The Western Political Quarterly 43 (2):297–316. doi: 10.2307/448368.
   Google Scholar
• Spaeth, Harold J., Lee Epstein, Andrew D. Martin, Jeffrey A. Segal, Theodore J. Ruger, and Sara C. Benesh. 2016. The Supreme Court Database. 2016 Supreme Court Database, Version 2015 Release 02.
   Google Scholar
• Wedeking, Justin, and Michael A. Zilis. 2017. “Disagreeable Rhetoric and the Prospect of Public Opposition: Opinion Moderation on the US Supreme Court.” Political Research Quarterly 71 (2): 380–394. 1065912917738578. doi: 10.1177/1065912917738578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, Lori, and Stuart Soroka. 2012. “Affective News: The Automated Coding of Sentiment in Political Texts.” Political Communication 29 (2):205–31. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2012.671234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar