Federal Appeals Court Responses to Supreme Court Precedent

References

• Alvarez, R. Michael, and Jonathan Nagler. 1998. “When Politics and Models Collide: Estimating Models of Multiparty Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (1):55–96. doi: 10.2307/2991747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, Lawrence. 2006. Judges and Their Audiences: A Perspective on Judicial Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benesh, Sara C., and Malia Reddick. 2002. “Overruled: An Event History Analysis of Lower Court Reaction to Supreme Court Alteration of Precedent.” The Journal of Politics 64 (2):534–50. doi: 10.1111/1468-2508.00138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, Ryan C., and James F. Spriggs. 2013. “The Citation and Depreciation of US Supreme Court Precedent.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 10 (2):325–58. doi: 10.1111/jels.12012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowie, Jennifer Barnes, and Donald R. Songer. 2009. “Assessing the Applicability of Strategic Theory to Explain Decision Making on the Courts of Appeals.” Political Research Quarterly 62 (2):393–407. doi: 10.1177/1065912908319253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, Christina L., and James F. Spriggs. 2009. “An Examination of Strategic Anticipation of Appellate Court Preferences by Federal District Court Judges.” Wash. UJL & Pol’y 29 (1):37–82.
   Google Scholar
• Bueno de Mesquita, Ethan, and Matthew Stephenson. 2002. “Informative Precedent and Intrajudicial Communication.” American Political Science Review 96 (4):755–66. doi: 10.1017/S0003055402000436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, Charles M., Jeffrey A. Segal, and Donald Songer. 2000. “Strategic Auditing in a Political Hierarchy: An Informational Model of the Supreme Court’s Certiorari Decisions.” American Political Science Review 94 (1):101–16. doi: 10.2307/2586383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, Tom S., Jeffrey R. Lax, and Douglas Rice. 2015. “Measuring the Political Salience of Supreme Court Cases.” Journal of Law and Courts 3 (1):37–65. doi: 10.1086/679111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corley, Pamela C. 2009. “Uncertain Precedent: Circuit Court Responses to Supreme Court Plurality Opinions.” American Politics Research 37 (1):30–49. doi: 10.1177/1532673X08319951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, Lee, and Jack Knight. 1997. The Choices Justices Make. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, Lee, Andrew D. Martin, Jeffrey A. Segal, and Chad Westerland. 2007. “The Judicial Common Space.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 23 (2):303–25. doi: 10.1093/jleo/ewm024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, Lee, and Jeffrey A. Segal. 2000. “Measuring Issue Salience.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (1):66–83. doi: 10.2307/2669293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, Lee, and Jeffrey A. Segal. 2006. “Trumping the First Amendment.” Wash. UJL & Pol’y 21:81.
   Google Scholar
• Fix, Michael P., and Benjamin J. Kassow. 2020. US Supreme Court Doctrine in the State High Courts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fix, Michael P., Justin T. Kingsland, and Matthew D. Montgomery. 2017. “The Complexities of State Court Compliance with US Supreme Court Precedent.” Justice System Journal 38 (2):149–63. doi: 10.1080/0098261X.2016.1274245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruhl, John. 1980. “The Supreme Court’s Impact on the Law of Libel: Compliance by Lower Federal Courts.” Western Political Quarterly 33 (4):502–19. doi: 10.1177/106591298003300405.
   Google Scholar
• Hansford, Thomas G., and James F. Spriggs. 2006. The Politics of Precedent on the US Supreme Court. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hansford, Thomas G., James F. Spriggs, and Anthony A. Stenger. 2013. “The Information Dynamics of Vertical Stare Decisis.” The Journal of Politics 75 (4):894–906. doi: 10.1017/S0022381613000686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hettinger, Virginia A., Stefanie A. Lindquist, and Wendy L. Martinek. 2004. “Comparing Attitudinal and Strategic Accounts of Dissenting Behavior on the US Courts of Appeals.” American Journal of Political Science 48 (1):123–37. doi: 10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00060.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hettinger, Virginia A., Stefanie A. Lindquist, and Wendy L. Martinek. 2007. Judging on a Collegial Court: Influences on Federal Appellate Decision Making. Charlottesville, Virginia: University of Virginia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hinkle, Rachael K. 2015. “Legal Constraint in the US Courts of Appeals.” The Journal of Politics 77 (3):721–35. doi: 10.1086/681059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinkle, Rachael K. 2017. “Panel Effects and Opinion Crafting in the US Courts of Appeals.” Journal of Law and Courts 5 (2):313–36. doi: 10.1086/692731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinkle, Rachael K., and Michael J. Nelson. 2018. “The Intergroup Foundations of Policy Influence.” Political Research Quarterly 71 (4):729–42. doi: 10.1177/1065912918761008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, Charles A. 1979. “Lower Court Reactions to Supreme Court Decisions: A Quantitative Examination.” American Journal of Political Science 23 (4):792–804. doi: 10.2307/2110807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassow, Benjamin, Donald R. Songer, and Michael P. Fix. 2012. “The Influence of Precedent on State Supreme Courts.” Political Research Quarterly 65 (2):372–84. doi: 10.1177/1065912910391477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kastellec, Jonathan P. 2007. “Panel Composition and Judicial Compliance on the U.S. Courts of Appeals.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 23 (2):421–41. doi: 10.1093/jleo/ewm026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kastellec, Jonathan P. 2011. “Hierarchical and Collegial Politics on the US Courts of Appeals.” The Journal of Politics 73 (2):345–61. doi: 10.1017/S0022381611000314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, David E. 2002. Making Law in the United States Courts of Appeals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, David E., and Robert J. Hume. 2003. “Fear of Reversal as an Explanation of Lower Court Compliance.” Law & Society Review 37 (3):579–81. doi: 10.1111/1540-5893.3703004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kropko, Jonathan. 2007. “Choosing between Multinomial Logit and Multinomial Probit Models for Analysis of Unordered Choice Data.” PhD diss., The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Masood, Ali S., Benjamin J. Kassow, and Donald R. Songer. 2017. “Supreme Court Precedent in a Judicial Hierarchy.” American Politics Research 45 (3):403–34. doi: 10.1177/1532673X16684572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masood, Ali S., Benjamin J. Kassow, and Donald R. Songer. 2019. “The Aggregate Dynamics of Lower Court Responses to the US Supreme Court.” Journal of Law and Courts 7 (2):159–86. doi: 10.1086/703067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, Matthew D., Michael P. Fix, and Justin T. Kingsland. 2021. “Rigid Rules and Slippery Standards: How the Nature of US Supreme Court Precedents Influences Subsequent State Court Treatments.” Social Science Quarterly 102 (6):2894–906. doi: 10.1111/ssqu.13082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randazzo, Kirk A. 2008. “Strategic Anticipation and the Hierarchy of Justice in US District Courts.” American Politics Research 36 (5):669–93. doi: 10.1177/1532673X08317286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, Mark J., and Herbert M. Kritzer. 2002. “Jurisprudential Regimes in Supreme Court Decision Making.” American Political Science Review 96 (2):305–20. doi: 10.1017/S0003055402000187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segal, Jeffrey A., and Harold J. Spaeth. 2002. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Songer, Donald R., and Susan Haire. 1992. “Integrating Alternative Approaches to the Study of Judicial Voting: Obscenity Cases in the U.S. Courts of Appeals.” American Journal of Political Science 36 (4):963–82. doi: 10.2307/2111356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Songer, Donald R., Jeffrey A. Segal, and Charles M. Cameron. 1994. “The Hierarchy of Justice: Testing a Principal-Agent Model of Supreme Court-Circuit Court Interactions.” American Journal of Political Science 38 (3):673–96. doi: 10.2307/2111602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Songer, Donald R., and Reginald S. Sheehan. 1990. “Supreme Court Impact on Compliance and Outcomes: Miranda and New York Times in the United States Courts of Appeals.” Western Political Quarterly 43 (2):297–316. doi: 10.1177/106591299004300206.
   Google Scholar
• Spriggs, James F., and Thomas G. Hansford. 2000. “Measuring Legal Change: The Reliability and Validity of Shepard’s Citations.” Political Research Quarterly 53 (2):327–41. doi: 10.1177/106591290005300206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spriggs, James F., and Thomas G. Hansford. 2001. “Explaining the Overruling of US Supreme Court Precedent.” The Journal of Politics 63 (4):1091–111. doi: 10.1111/0022-3816.00102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerland, Chad, Jeffrey A. Segal, Lee Epstein, Charles M. Cameron, and Scott Comparato. 2010. “Strategic Defiance and Compliance in the US Courts of Appeals.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (4):891–905. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00465.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar