108
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The Supreme Spectacle: An Analysis of Public Attendance at the Supreme Court

References

  • Baird, V. A., and A. Gangl. 2006. “Shattering the Myth of Legality: The Impact of the Media’s Framing of Supreme Court Procedures on Perceptions of Fairness.” Political Psychology 27(4): 597–614. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00518.x.
  • Berkson, L. C. (1978). The Supreme Court and its publics: The communication of policy decisions. Great Source Education Group.
  • Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98 (2000)
  • Caldeira, G. A. 1987. “Public Opinion and The U.S. Supreme Court: FDR’s Court-Packing Plan.” American Political Science Review 81(4): 1139–1153. doi: 10.2307/1962582.
  • Caldeira, G. A., and J.L. Gibson. 1992. “The Etiology of Public Support for the Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 36(4): 635–664. doi: 10.2307/2111585.
  • Clark, T. S., Lax, J. R., & Rice, D. (2015). Measuring the political salience of Supreme Court cases. Journal of Law and Courts, 3(1), 37–65.
  • Clawson, R. A., and E. N. Waltenburg. 2003. “Support for A Supreme Court Affirmative Action Decision: A Story in Black and White.” American Politics Research 31(3): 251–279. doi: 10.1177/1532673X03251197.
  • “Courtroom Access.” 2020. SCOTUSblog. https://www.scotusblog.com/category/special-features/courtroom-access-2020/
  • Davis, R. 1994. Decisions and Images: The Supreme Court and the Press. Pearson College Div.
  • Davis, R. 2011. Justices and Journalists: The U.S. Supreme Court and the Media Cambridge University Press.
  • Epstein, L., and J. A. Segal. 2000. “Measuring Issue Salience.” American Journal of Political Science 44(1): 66–83. doi: 10.2307/2669293.
  • Franklin, C. H., & Kosaki, L. C. (1989). Republican schoolmaster: The US Supreme Court, public opinion, and abortion. American Political Science Review, 83(3), 751–771.
  • Gibson, J. L., and G. A. Caldeira. 1992. “Blacks and the United States Supreme Court: Models of Diffuse Support.” The Journal of Politics 54(4): 1120–1145. doi: 10.2307/2132111.
  • Gibson, J. L., and G. A. Caldeira. 2009. “Knowing the Supreme Court? A Reconsideration of Public Ignorance of the High Court.” The Journal of Politics 71(2): 429–441. doi: 10.1017/S0022381609090379.
  • Gibson, J. L., and G. A. Caldeira. 2011. “Has Legal Realism Damaged the Legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court?” Law and Society Review 45(1): 195–219. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00432.x.
  • Gibson, J. L., Caldeira, G. A., and L. Spence. 2003. “The Supreme Court and the US Presidential Election of 2000: Wounds, Self-Inflicted or Otherwise?” British Journal of Political Science 33(4): 535–556.
  • Haider-Markel, D. P., Allen, M. D., and M. Johansen. 2006. “Understanding Variations in Media Coverage of U.S. Supreme Court Decisions: Comparing Media Outlets in Their Coverage of Lawrence v. Texas.” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 11(2): 64–85. doi: 10.1177/1081180X05286065.
  • Hitt, M. P., and K. Searles. 2018. “Media Coverage and Public Approval of the U.S. Supreme Court.” Political Communication 35(4): 566–586. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2018.1467517.
  • Hoekstra, V. J. 2000. “The Supreme Court and Local Public Opinion.” American Political Science Review 94(1): 89–100. doi: 10.2307/2586382.
  • Howe, A. 2020. “Courtroom Access: The Nuts and bolts of courtroom seating – and the lines for public access.” SCOTUSblog. https://www.scotusblog.com/2020/04/courtroom-access-the-nuts-and-bolts-of-courtroom-seating-and-the-lines-to-gain-access-to-the-courtroom/
  • Jaros, D., and R. Roper. 1980. “The U.S. Supreme Court: Myth, Diffuse Support, Specific Support, and Legitimacy.” American Politics Quarterly 8(1): 85–105. doi: 10.1177/1532673X8000800105.
  • Johnson, T., and E. Socker. 2012. “Actions, Factions, and Interactions: Newsworthy Influences on Supreme Court Coverage.” Social Science Quarterly 93(2): 434–463. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2012.00842.x.
  • LaRowe, N., and V. Hoekstra. “On and Off the Supreme Court Beat: Differences in Newspaper Coverage of the Supreme Court and the Implications for Public Support.” Chapter. In Covering the United States Supreme Court in the Digital Age, edited by Richard Davis, 126–52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
  • Linos, K., and K. Twist. 2016. “The Supreme Court, the Media, and Public Opinion: Comparing Experimental and Observational Methods.” The Journal of Legal Studies 45(2): 223–254. doi: 10.1086/687365.
  • Nicholson, S. P., and R. M. Howard. 2003. “Framing Support for the Supreme Court in the Aftermath of Bush v. Gore.” The Journal of Politics 65(3): 676–695. doi: 10.1111/1468-2508.00207.
  • Slotnick, E. E., and J. A. Segal. 1999. Television news and the Supreme Court: All the news that’s fit to air? New York, USA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Spaeth, H., Epstein, L., Martin, A. D., Segal, J. A., Ruger, T. J., and S. C. Benesh. 2020. “Supreme Court Database, Version 2020 Release 01.” http://Supremecourtdatabase.org
  • Spill, R. L., and Z. M. Oxley. 2003. “Philosopher Kings or Political Actors-How the Media Portray the Supreme Court.” Judicature 87(1): 22–29.
  • Vining, R. L., and P. Marcin. 2014. An Economic Theory of Supreme Court News. Political Communication 31(1): 94–111. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2012.747189.
  • Vining, R. L., and T. Wilhelm. 2010. Explaining High-Profile Coverage of State Supreme Court Decisions. Social Science Quarterly 91(3): 703–723 doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2010.00715.x.
  • Zilis, M.A. 2015. The Limits of Legitimacy: Dissenting Opinions, Media Coverage, and Public Responses to Supreme Court Decisions. University of Michigan Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.