50
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Snooze or Snub? How the Public Reacts to Judicial Attendance at the State of the Union

ORCID Icon &

References

  • Armaly, M. T. 2018. “Extra-Judicial Actor Induced Change in Supreme Court Legitimacy.” Political Research Quarterly 71 (3):600–13. doi: 10.1177/1065912917750278.
  • Baird, V. A., and A. Gangl. 2006. “Shattering the Myth of Legality: The Impact of the Media's Framing of Supreme Court Procedures on Perceptions of Fairness.” Political Psychology 27 (4):597–614. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00518.x.
  • Buhrmester, M., T. Kwang, and S. D. Gosling. 2016. “Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, yet High-Quality Data?” Perspectives on Psychological Science 6 (1):3–5.
  • Bullock, J. G. 2011. “Elite Influence on Public Opinion in an Informed Electorate.” American Political Science Review 105 (3):496–515. doi: 10.1017/S0003055411000165.
  • Caldeira, G. A., and J. L. Gibson. 1992. “The Etiology of Public Support for the Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 36 (3):635–64. doi: 10.2307/2111585.
  • Canes-Wrone, B. 2001. “The President's Legislative Influence from Public Appeals.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (2):313–29. doi: 10.2307/2669343.
  • Canes-Wrone, B., and De Marchi, S. 2002. “Presidential Approval and Legislative Success.” The Journal of Politics 64 (2):491–509. doi: 10.1111/1468-2508.00136.
  • Canon, B. C., and M. Giles. 1972. “Recurring Litigants: Federal Agencies before the Supreme Court.” Western Political Quarterly 25 (2):183–91. doi: 10.1177/106591297202500203.
  • Christenson, D. P., and D. L. Kriner. 2019. “Does Public Opinion Constrain Presidential Unilateralism?” American Political Science Review 113 (4):1071–7. doi: 10.1017/S0003055419000327.
  • Christenson, D. P., and D. M. Glick. 2015. “Chief Justice Roberts's Health Care Decision Disrobed: The Microfoundations of the Supreme Court's Legitimacy.” American Journal of Political Science, 59 (2):403–18.
  • Clark, T. S. 2009. “The Separation of Powers, Court Curbing, and Judicial Legitimacy.” American Journal of Political Science 53 (4):971–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00411.x.
  • Clark, T. S., and J. P. Kastellec. 2015. “Source Cues and Public Support for the Supreme Court.” American Politics Research 43 (3):504–35. doi: 10.1177/1532673X14560809.
  • Clawson, R. A., and E. N. Waltenburg. 2003. “Support for a Supreme Court Affirmative Action Decision: A Story in Black and White.” American Politics Research 31 (3):251–79. doi: 10.1177/1532673X03251197.
  • Clifford, S., R. M. Jewell, and P. D. Waggoner. 2015. “Are Samples Drawn from Mechanical Turk Valid for Research on Political Ideology?” Research & Politics 2 (4):205316801562207. doi: 10.1177/2053168015622072.
  • Druckman, J. N., and A. Lupia. 2000. “Preference Formation.” Annual Review of Political Science 3 (1):1–24. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.1.
  • Druckman, J. N., E. Peterson, and R. Slothuus. 2013. “How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation.” American Political Science Review 107 (1):57–79. doi: 10.1017/S0003055412000500.
  • Easton, D. 1965. A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: Wiley
  • Epstein, L., and E. A. Posner. 2016. “Supreme Court Justices’ Loyalty to the President.” The Journal of Legal Studies 45 (2):401–36. doi: 10.1086/688395.
  • Eshbaugh‐Soha, M., and Collins Jr, P. M. 2015. “Presidential Rhetoric and Supreme Court Decisions.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 45 (4):633–52. doi: 10.1111/psq.12222.
  • Gibson, J. L., and G. A. Caldeira. 2009. Citizens, Courts, and Confirmations: Positivity Theory and the Judgments of the American People. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Gibson, J. L., and G. A. Caldeira. 2011. “Has Legal Realism Damaged the Legitimacy of the US Supreme Court?” Law & Society Review 45 (1):195–219. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00432.x.
  • Haglin, K., S. Jordan, A. H. Merrill, and J. D. Ura. 2021. “Ideology and Specific Support for the Supreme Court.” Political Research Quarterly 74 (4):955–969.
  • Hitt, M. P., and K. Searles. 2018. “Media Coverage and Public Approval of the US Supreme Court.” Political Communication 35 (4):566–86. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2018.1467517.
  • Hoekstra, V. J. 1995. “The Supreme Court and Opinion Change: An Experimental Study of the Court's Ability to Change Opinion.” American Politics Quarterly 23 (1):109–29. doi: 10.1177/1532673X9502300106.
  • Hudson, W. E. 2020. American Democracy in Peril. Los Angeles: CQ Press.
  • Kahan, D. M. 2015. “The Politically Motivated Reasoning Paradigm.” Emerging Trends in Social & Behavioral Sciences 1–16.
  • Krewson, C. N. 2019. “Save This Honorable Court: Shaping Public Perceptions of the Supreme Court off the Bench.” Political Research Quarterly 72 (3):686–99. doi: 10.1177/1065912918801563.
  • Kritzer, H. M. 2001. “The Impact of Bush v. Gore on Public Perceptions and Knowledge of Supreme Court.” Judicature 85:32.
  • Kromphardt, C. D., and M. F. Salamone. 2021. ““Unpresidented!” or: What Happens When the President Attacks the Federal Judiciary on Twitter.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 18 (1):84–100.
  • Levay, K. E., J. Freese, and J. N. Druckman. 2016. “The Demographic and Political Composition of Mechanical Turk Samples.” SAGE Open 6 (1):215824401663643. doi: 10.1177/2158244016636433.
  • Light, J. S. 1999. “When Computers Were Women.” Technology and Culture 40 (3):455–83. doi: 10.1353/tech.1999.0128.
  • Linos, K., and K. Twist. 2016. “The Supreme Court, the Media, and Public Opinion: Comparing Experimental and Observational Methods.” The Journal of Legal Studies 45 (2):223–54. doi: 10.1086/687365.
  • Lupia, A. 1992. “Busy Voters, Agenda Control, and the Power of Information.” American Political Science Review 86 (2):390–403. doi: 10.2307/1964228.
  • Lupia, A. 1994. “Shortcuts versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections.” American Political Science Review 88 (1):63–76. doi: 10.2307/2944882.
  • Lupia, A., M. D. McCubbins, and L. Arthur. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Massie, T. D., T. G. Hansford, and D. R. Songer. 2004. “The Timing of Presidential Nominations to the Lower Federal Courts.” Political Research Quarterly 57 (1):145–54. doi: 10.1177/106591290405700112.
  • Meernik, J., and J. Ignagni. 1997. “Judicial Review and Coordinate Construction of the Constitution.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (2):447–67. doi: 10.2307/2111772.
  • Moe, T. M. 1985. “The Politicized Presidency.” The New Direction in American Politics 235 (238):244–63.
  • Montgomery, M. D., N. C. Rogol, and J. T. Kingsland. 2019. “Presidential Rhetoric and US Supreme Court Rulings: The Effect of Going Public on Citizen Evaluations of Institutions and Policy.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 49 (4):870–97. doi: 10.1111/psq.12596.
  • Mullinix, K. J., T. J. Leeper, J. N. Druckman, and J. Freese. 2015. “The Generalizability of Survey Experiments.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 2 (2):109–38. doi: 10.1017/XPS.2015.19.
  • Nelson, M. J., and A. Uribe-McGuire. 2017. “Opportunity and Overrides: The Effect of Institutional Public Support on Congressional Overrides of Supreme Court Decisions.” Political Research Quarterly 70 (3):632–43. doi: 10.1177/1065912917709353.
  • Nelson, M. J., and J. L. Gibson. 2019. “How Does Hyperpoliticized Rhetoric Affect the US Supreme Court’s Legitimacy?” The Journal of Politics 81 (4):1512–6. doi: 10.1086/704701.
  • Nicholson, S. P., and T. G. Hansford. 2014. “Partisans in Robes: Party Cues and Public Acceptance of Supreme Court Decisions.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (3):620–36. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12091.
  • Paulsen, M. S. 1994. “Is Lloyd Bentsen Unconstitutional?” Stanford Law Review 46 (4):907–18. doi: 10.2307/1229096.
  • Peppers, T. C., and M. W. Giles. 2012. “Of Plotted Plants and Political Images: The Supreme Court and the State of the Union Address.” Kan. JL & Pub. Pol'y 22:49.
  • Popkin, S. L. 1994. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Sala, B. R., and J. F. Spriggs. 2004. “Designing Tests of the Supreme Court and the Separation of Powers.” Political Research Quarterly 57 (2):197–208. doi: 10.1177/106591290405700202.
  • Segal, J. A., and H. J. Spaeth. 2002. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Spill, R. L., and Z. M. Oxley. 2003. “Philosopher Kings or Political Actors-How the Media Portray the Supreme Court.” Judicature 87:22.
  • Tilley, J., and S. B. Hobolt. 2011. “Is the Government to Blame? An Experimental Test of How Partisanship Shapes Perceptions of Performance and Responsibility.” The Journal of Politics 73 (2):316–30. doi: 10.1017/S0022381611000168.
  • Tyler, T. R. 2006. Why People Obey the Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Ura, J. D., and P. C. Wohlfarth. 2010. ““An Appeal to the People”: Public Opinion and Congressional Support for the Supreme Court.” The Journal of Politics 72 (4):939–56. doi: 10.1017/S0022381610000459.
  • Whittington, K. E. 1999. Constitutional Construction: Divided Powers and Constitutional Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Williams, R. J., and J. F. Smith. 2018. “Keeping Up Appearances: Non-policy Court Responses to Public Opinion.” Justice System Journal 39 (1):54–74. doi: 10.1080/0098261X.2017.1355763.
  • Zaller, J. R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.